Cited by 37Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The production of surface carbon depletions among globular cluster giants by interior mixing

Open access
Smith, G. H., Tout, C. A.·1992·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Published measurements of the carbon abundances of giants in several metal-poor globular clusters have indicated that [C/H] decreases progressively from the base to the tip of the giant branch by a total of 1.0 dex or more. Standard stellar models indicate that throughout much of giant branch evolution the convective envelope of a cluster star is not expected to be in contact with regions near the nuclear-burning shell wherein the |$\text C\to\text N$| process of hydrogen burning is taking place. The observations indicate, therefore, that transport of material must take place between the base of the convective envelope and the hydrogen-burning shell throughout much of the giant branch phase of evolution. A carbon abundance gradient of |$d[\text {C\H}]/dM_V \approx 0.25 \enspace \text {dex} \enspace \text {mag}^{-1}$| is observed on the giant branch of the cluster M92 by Carbon et al. We find that this gradient can be accounted for if circulation currents having speeds |$\sim 10^{-2}\enspace \text {cm}\enspace \text s^{-1}$| within the M92 giants are cycling material from the convective envelope down into the proximity of the hydrogen-burning shell, where it is processed and subsequently returned to the envelope. Giant branch mixing may be capable of producing significant modifications from the initial C and N abundance distribution of cluster stars. In order to account for the existence of CN-strong stars on the upper giant branches of globular clusters, it may be necessary to infer that the atmospheres of such stars have undergone substantial |$\text O \to \text N$| processing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/256.3.449

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smith & Tout (1992) showed that simplified models could reproduce the decrease of [C/Fe] seen along the RGB of globular clusters, provided an appropriate choice was made for the depth and rate of mixing.

    “Smith & Tout (1992) showed that such simplified models could reproduce the decrease of [ C/Fe ] seen along the RGB of GCs, provided an appropriate choice was made for the depth and rate of mixing.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, G. H., & Tout, C. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1992-06-01
Volume
256
Issue
3
Pages
449-456
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2040407894
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
globular clusters, giant branch, carbon depletion, metal-poor stars, M92, convective envelope, hydrogen-burning shell, carbon-nitrogen cycle, circulation currents, stellar nucleosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review