The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the mechanisms of gamma radiation in the Crab Nebula
Open accessAbstract
Different mechanisms responsible for production of the broad-band non-thermal radiation of the Crab Nebula are discussed. It is shown that the synchrotron radiation, calculated in the framework of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model to describe the spatial distribution of the nebular magnetic field and relativistic electrons, is in good agreement with the observed fluxes from radio frequencies to medium-energy γ-rays, E≤ 1 GeV. The γ-rays observed at higher energies require another radiation mechanism. The inverse Compton (IC) scattering of the relativistic electrons on the synchrotron, ‘dust’ far-IR, and 2.7-K microwave background radiation, is the most effective mechanism for the production of very high energy γ-rays, with E > 100 GeV. The detailed study of the IC radiation spectra shows that although the absolute fluxes of the IC γ-rays are sensitive to the average magnetic field in the nebula, the shape of the IC γ-ray spectrum is rather stable to the basic parameters of the nebula. We discuss also the possible role of bremsstrahlung of the relativistic electrons in the Crab Nebula. Although the mean gas density in the nebula, ####g, is insufficient to expect a significant contribution from bremsstrahlung to the flux of high-energy γ-rays, the effective gas density neff for interactions of relativistic particles with the ambient gas could be much higher than ####g, if the relativistic particles were partially captured in the dense filaments in the Crab Nebula. In this case the bremsstrahlung could play a principal role in the formation of the radiation spectrum of the Crab in the energy region 1–100 GeV. So far there is no information on the acceleration of relativistic protons in the Crab. The upper limits of π0-decay γ-ray fluxes, based on consideration of the energy balance between the magnetic field and relativistic particles in the nebula, show that noticeable contribution of these γ-rays may be expected only at energies above 10 TeV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Crab Nebula: An Astrophysical Chimera
Hester, J. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110608 · Cited by 391
A strong astrophysical constraint on the violation of special relativity by quantum gravity
Jacobson, T., Liberati, S., & Mattingly, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01882 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Atoyan, A. M., & Aharonian, F. A.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-01-11
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 525-541
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2078622240
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the mechanisms of gamma radiation in the Crab Nebula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/278.2.525
- The paper
- Atoyan, A. M., & Aharonian, F. A. (1996). On the mechanisms of gamma radiation in the Crab Nebula. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/278.2.525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.