The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Galaxy morphology to I=25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field
Open accessAbstract
The morphological properties of galaxies in the range 21 < I < 25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field are investigated using a quantitative classification system based on measurements of the central concentration and asymmetry of galaxian light. The class distribution of objects in the Hubble Deep Field is strongly skewed towards highly asymmetric objects, relative to distributions from both the HST Medium Deep Survey at I<22 mag and an artificially redshifted sample of local galaxies. The steeply rising number count-magnitude relation for irregular/peculiar/merging systems at I < 22 mag reported by Glazebrook et al. continues to at least I = 25 mag. Although these peculiar systems are predominantly blue at optical wavelengths, a significant fraction also exhibit red U–B colours, which may indicate that they are at high redshift. Beyond Glazebrook et al.'s magnitude limit, the spiral counts appear to rise more steeply than high-normalization no-evolution predictions, whereas those of elliptical/S0 galaxies only slightly exceed such predictions and may turn over beyond I ∼ 24 mag. These results are compared with those from previous investigations of faint galaxy morphology with HST, and the possible implications are briefly discussed. The large fraction of peculiar/irregular/merging systems in the Hubble Deep Field suggests that by I ∼ 25 mag the conventional Hubble system no longer provides an adequate description of the morphological characteristics of a high fraction of field galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories
Conselice, C. J. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/375001 · Cited by 875
THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5
Lotz, J. M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T. J., Croton, D., Primack, J. R., Somerville, R. S., & Stewart, K. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/103 · Cited by 450
Athanassoula, E., Machado, R. E. G., & Rodionov, S. A. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts452 · Cited by 338
Morpheus: A Deep Learning Framework for the Pixel-level Analysis of Astronomical Image Data
Hausen, R., & Robertson, B. E. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8868 · Cited by 110
“G A ] 2 6 Ju n 20 19 2 analysis methods including measures of galaxy asymmetry, concentration, flux distribution (e.g., Abraham et al. 1994, 1996; Conselice et al. 2000; Conselice 2003; Lotz et al. 2004), shapelet decompositions (Kelly & McKay 2004; Kelly & McKay 2005), and morphological principal…”
MethodQuantifying Non-parametric Structure of High-redshift Galaxies with Deep Learning
Tohill, C., Ferreira, L., Conselice, C. J., Bamford, S. P., & Ferrari, F. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac033c · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, R. G., Tanvir, N. R., Santiago, B. X., Ellis, R. S., Glazebrook, K., & Bergh, S. V. D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 279
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- L47-L52
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2095369941
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Galaxy morphology to I=25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/279.3.l47
- The paper
- Abraham, R. G., Tanvir, N. R., Santiago, B. X., Ellis, R. S., Glazebrook, K., & Bergh, S. V. D. (1996). Galaxy morphology to I=25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/279.3.l47
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.