The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large-scale bias in the Universe: bispectrum method
Open accessAbstract
Evidence that the Universe may be close to the critical density, required for its expansion eventually to be halted, comes principally from dynamical studies of large-scale structure. These studies use the observed peculiar velocity field of galaxies either directly, or indirectly by quantifying its anisotropic effect on galaxy clustering in redshift surveys. A potential difficulty with both such approaches is that the density parameter Ω0 is obtained only in the combination β =Ω0.060/ b, if linear perturbation theory is used. The determination of the density parameter $#x03A9;0 is therefore compromised by the lack of a good measurement of the bias parameter b, which relates the clustering of sample galaxies to the clustering of mass. In this paper, we develop an idea of Fry, using second-order perturbation theory to investigate how to measure the bias parameter on large scales. The use of higher order statistics allows the degeneracy between b and Ω0 to be lifted, and an unambiguous determination of Ω0 then becomes possible. We apply a likelihood approach to the bispectrum, the three-point function in Fourier space. This paper is the first step in turning the idea into a practical proposition for redshift surveys, and is principally concerned with noise properties of the bispectrum, which are non-trivial. The calculation of the required bispectrum covariances involves the six-point function, including many noise terms, for which we have developed a generating functional approach which will be of value in calculating high-order statistics in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Self-citationDesjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
The Bispectrum as a Signature of Gravitational Instability in Redshift Space
Scoccimarro, R., Couchman, H. M. P., & Frieman, J. A. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307220 · Cited by 297
Sefusatti, E., Crocce, M., Pueblas, S., & Scoccimarro, R. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.023522 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Matarrese, S., Verde, L., & Heavens, A. F.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 290
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 651-662
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1984550984
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale bias in the Universe: bispectrum method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/290.4.651
- The paper
- Matarrese, S., Verde, L., & Heavens, A. F. (1997). Large-scale bias in the Universe: bispectrum method. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/290.4.651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.