The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Massively parallel Bayesian inference for transient gravitational-wave astronomy
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the properties of transient gravitational waves (GWs) and their sources is of broad interest in physics and astronomy. Bayesian inference is the standard framework for astrophysical measurement in transient GW astronomy. Usually, stochastic sampling algorithms are used to estimate posterior probability distributions over the parameter spaces of models describing experimental data. The most physically accurate models typically come with a large computational overhead which can render data analsis extremely time consuming, or possibly even prohibitive. In some cases highly specialized optimizations can mitigate these issues, though they can be difficult to implement, as well as to generalize to arbitrary models of the data. Here, we investigate an accurate, flexible, and scalable method for astrophysical inference: parallelized nested sampling. The reduction in the wall-time of inference scales almost linearly with the number of parallel processes running on a high-performance computing cluster. By utilizing a pool of several hundreds or thousands of CPUs in a high-performance cluster, the large wall times of many astrophysical inferences can be alleviated while simultaneously ensuring that any GW signal model can be used ‘out of the box’, i.e. without additional optimization or approximation. Our method will be useful to both the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaborations and the wider scientific community performing astrophysical analyses on GWs. An implementation is available in the open source gravitational-wave inference library pBilby (parallel bilby).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Cited by
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, N., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agarwal, D., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 · Cited by 1,754
Self-citationAbbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Self-citationGW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agathos, M., et al. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015 · Cited by 657
Self-citationObservation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/11385 · Cited by 609
Self-citationPratten, G., García-Quirós, C., Colleoni, M., Ramos-Buades, A., Estellés, H., Mateu-Lucena, M., Jaume, R., Haney, M., Keitel, D., Thompson, J. E., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104056 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. J. E., Ashton, G., Vajpeyi, A., & Talbot, C.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-08-19
- Volume
- 498
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 4492-4502
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3019803136
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Massively parallel Bayesian inference for transient gravitational-wave astronomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/staa2483
- The paper
- Smith, R. J. E., Ashton, G., Vajpeyi, A., & Talbot, C. (2020). Massively parallel Bayesian inference for transient gravitational-wave astronomy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.