The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes
Open accessAbstract
We present imrphenomxphm, a phenomenological frequency-domain model for the gravitational-wave signal emitted by quasicircular precessing binary black holes, which incorporates multipoles beyond the dominant quadrupole in the precessing frame. The model is a precessing extension of imrphenomxhm, [C. Garc\'{\i}a-Quir\'os et al., Phys. Rev. D 102, 064002 (2020)] based on approximate maps between aligned-spin waveform modes in the coprecessing frame and precessing waveform modes in the inertial frame, which is commonly referred to as ``twisting up'' the nonprecessing waveforms. imrphenomxphm includes imrphenomxp as a special case, the restriction to the dominant quadrupole contribution in the coprecessing frame. We implement two alternative mappings, one based on a single-spin post-Newtonian approximation, as used in imrphenompv2 [M. Hannam et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151101 (2014).], and one based on the double-spin multiple scale analysis approach of [K. Chatziioannou et al., Phys. Rev. D 95, 104004 (2017).]. We include a detailed discussion of conventions used in the description of precessing binaries and of all choices made in constructing the model. The computational cost of imrphenomxphm is further reduced by extending the interpolation technique of [C. Garc\'{\i}a-Quir\'os et al., Classical Quant. Grav. 38, 015006 (2021).] to the Euler angles. The accuracy, speed, robustness, and modularity of the imrphenomx family will make these models productive tools for gravitational wave astronomy in the current era of greatly increased number and diversity of detected events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 · Cited by 14,151
Self-citationSciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2019) · Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository · doi:10.17863/cam.64134 · Cited by 10,460
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 · Cited by 3,518
Self-citationThe LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Aasi, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M. R., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., et al. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 · Cited by 3,356
Self-citationdynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences
Speagle, J. S. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa278 · Cited by 2,230
Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation
Thorne, K. S. (1980) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.299 · Cited by 1,641
Cutler, C., & Flanagan, É. E. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.2658 · Cited by 1,615
Bilby: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy
Ashton, G., Hübner, M., Lasky, P. D., Talbot, C., Ackley, K., Biscoveanu, S., Chu, Q., Divakarla, A., Easter, P. J., Goncharov, B., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc · Cited by 1,138
Khan, S., Husa, S., Hannam, M., Ohme, F., Pürrer, M., Forteza, X. J., & Bohé, A. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.044007 · Cited by 1,081
Self-citation
Cited by
Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/11385 · Cited by 609
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pratten, G., García-Quirós, C., Colleoni, M., Ramos-Buades, A., Estellés, H., Mateu-Lucena, M., Jaume, R., Haney, M., Keitel, D., Thompson, J. E., & Husa, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2021-05-25
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W3160629185
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 43.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.103.104056
- The paper
- Pratten, G., García-Quirós, C., Colleoni, M., Ramos-Buades, A., Estellés, H., Mateu-Lucena, M., Jaume, R., Haney, M., Keitel, D., Thompson, J. E., & Husa, S. (2021). Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.103.104056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
