Cited by 63Image and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Learning to denoise astronomical images with U-nets

Open access
Vojtekova, Antonia, Lieu, Maggie, Valtchanov, Ivan, Altieri, Bruno, Old, Lyndsay, Chen, Qifeng, Hroch, Filip·2021·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Astronomical images are essential for exploring and understanding the Universe. Optical telescopes capable of deep observations, such as the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), are heavily oversubscribed in the Astronomical Community. Images also often contain additive noise, which makes denoising a mandatory step in post-processing the data before further data analysis. In order to maximize the efficiency and information gain in the post-processing of astronomical imaging, we turn to machine learning. We propose Astro U-net, a convolutional neural network for image denoising and enhancement. For a proof-of-concept, we use HST images from Wide Field Camera 3 instrument UV/visible channel with F555W and F606W filters. Our network is able to produce images with noise characteristics as if they are obtained with twice the exposure time, and with minimum bias or information loss. From these images, we are able to recover $95.9{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ of stars with an average flux error of $2.26{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$. Furthermore, the images have, on average, 1.63 times higher signal-to-noise ratio than the input noisy images, equivalent to the stacking of at least three input images, which means a significant reduction in the telescope time needed for future astronomical imaging campaigns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/staa3567

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vojtekova, A., Lieu, M., Valtchanov, I., Altieri, B., Old, L., Chen, Q., & Hroch, F.
Affiliations
  • Masaryk University (CZ)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • European Space Astronomy Centre (ES)
  • European Space Agency (FR)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
Vojtekova, Antonia
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2020-11-18
Volume
503
Issue
3
Pages
3204-3215
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3098463180
Cited by
63
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
U-Net, convolutional neural networks, Hubble Space Telescope, WFC3, image enhancement, signal-to-noise ratio, star detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review