Cited by 26Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

From EMBER to FIRE: predicting high resolution baryon fields from dark matter simulations with deep learning

Open access
Bernardini, M, Feldmann, R, Anglés-Alcázar, D, Boylan-Kolchin, M, Bullock, J, Mayer, L, Stadel, J·2021·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Hydrodynamic simulations provide a powerful, but computationally expensive, approach to study the interplay of dark matter and baryons in cosmological structure formation. Here, we introduce the EMulating Baryonic EnRichment (EMBER) Deep Learning framework to predict baryon fields based on dark matter-only simulations thereby reducing computational cost. EMBER comprises two network architectures, U-Net and Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (WGANs), to predict 2D gas and H i densities from dark matter fields. We design the conditional WGANs as stochastic emulators, such that multiple target fields can be sampled from the same dark matter input. For training we combine cosmological volume and zoom-in hydrodynamical simulations from the Feedback in Realistic Environments (FIRE) project to represent a large range of scales. Our fiducial WGAN model reproduces the gas and H i power spectra within 10 per cent accuracy down to ∼10 kpc scales. Furthermore, we investigate the capability of EMBER to predict high resolution baryon fields from low resolution dark matter inputs through upsampling techniques. As a practical application, we use this methodology to emulate high-resolution H i maps for a dark matter simulation of a $L=100\, \text{Mpc}\, h^{ -1}$ comoving cosmological box. The gas content of dark matter haloes and the H i column density distributions predicted by EMBER agree well with results of large volume cosmological simulations and abundance matching models. Our method provides a computationally efficient, stochastic emulator for augmenting dark matter only simulations with physically consistent maps of baryon fields.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stab3088

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bernardini et al. (2021) reported accurate H I power spectra to within 10% accuracy up to 10 kpc scales while mapping simulation boxes of 100 h^-1 Mpc on the side.

    “The authors report accurate H I power spectra to within 10% accuracy up to the 10 kpc scales while being able to map simulation boxes of 100 h -1 Mpc on the side.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Bernardini et al. (2021)

  • Bernardini et al. (2021) successfully trained a conditional WGAN on images of size 512^2, and the purely convolutional model can be applied on much larger fields after training.

    “This strategy allows them to successfully train the model on images of size 512 2 , but after training this purely convolutional model can be applied on much larger fields.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Bernardini et al. (2021)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Altay G., Theuns T., Schaye J., Crighton N. H. M., Dalla Vecchia C., 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 737, L37
  2. Bacon R., et al., 2010, in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III. p. 773508, doi:10.1117/12.856027 · DOI
  3. Bertschinger E., 2001, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 137, 1-20
  4. Bolatto A. D., Wolfire M., Leroy A. K., 2013, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 51, 207-268
  5. Decarli R., et al., 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 882, 138
  6. Faucher-Giguère C.-A., Kereš D., Dijkstra M., Hernquist L., Zaldarriaga M., 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 725, 633-657
  7. Feder R. M., Berger P., Stein G., 2020, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2005.03050 · arXiv
  8. Feldmann R., Faucher-Giguère C.-A., Kereš D., 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 871, L21
  9. Fumagalli M., Hennawi J. F., Prochaska J. X., Kasen D., Dekel A., Ceverino D., Primack J., 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 780, 74
  10. Giusarma E., Reyes Hurtado M., Villaescusa-Navarro F., He S., Ho S., Hahn C., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1910.04255 · arXiv
  11. Glorot X., Bengio Y., 2010, in AISTATS.
  12. GnedinO.Y.,KravtsovA.V.,KlypinA.A.,NagaiD.,2004,TheAstrophysical Journal, 616, 16-26
  13. Goodfellow I. J., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M., Xu B., Warde-Farley D., Ozair S., Courville A., Bengio Y., 2014, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1406.2661 Governato F., et al., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1231 · arXiv
  14. Ho S. H., Martin C. L., Turner M. L., 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 875, 54
  15. Jesseit R., Naab T., Burkert A., 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 571, L89-L92
  16. Karim A., et al., 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 730, 61
  17. Kazantzidis S., Abadi M. G., Navarro J. F., 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 720, L62-L66
  18. Lee K.-G., et al., 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 237, 31
  19. Li Y.-P., et al., 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 866, 70
  20. Morganti R., Oosterloo T., 2018, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 26
  21. Moster B. P., Naab T., Lindström M., O'Leary J. A., 2020, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2005.12276 · arXiv
  22. Newman A. B., et al., 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 891, 147
  23. Papastergis E., Giovanelli R., Haynes M. P., Rodríguez-Puebla A., Jones M. G., 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 776, 43
  24. Pavesi R., et al., 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 864, 49
  25. Perraudin N., Marcon S., Lucchi A., Kacprzak T., 2020, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2004.08139 · arXiv
  26. Ravoux C., et al., 2020, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020, 010-010
  27. Reddick R. M., Wechsler R. H., Tinker J. L., Behroozi P. S., 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 771, 30
  28. Schneider A., Teyssier R., Stadel J., Chisari N. E., Brun A. M. L., Amara A., Refregier A., 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019, 020-020
  29. Sirko E., 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 634, 728-743
  30. Somerville R. S., Davé R., 2015, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 53, 51-113
  31. Stern J., et al., 2021, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2105.06489 · arXiv
  32. Tamosiunas A., Winther H. A., Koyama K., Bacon D. J., Nichol R. C., Mawdsley B., 2020, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2004.10223 · arXiv
  33. Thiele L., Villaescusa-Navarro F., Spergel D. N., Nelson D., Pillepich A., 2020, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2007.07267 · arXiv
  34. Valentini M., et al., 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3131 · DOI
  35. Villaescusa-Navarro F., et al., 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 866, 135
  36. Villaescusa-Navarro F., Wandelt B. D., Anglés-Alcázar D., Genel S., Zorrilla Mantilla J. M., Ho S., Spergel D. N., 2020b, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2011.05992 · arXiv
  37. Wadekar D., Villaescusa-Navarro F., Ho S., Perreault-Levasseur L., 2020, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2007.10340 · arXiv
  38. Wang Z., Bovik A., Sheikh H., Simoncelli E., 2004, Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13, 600
  39. Wechsler R. H., Tinker J. L., 2018, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 56, 435-487
  40. Quataert E., 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 827, L23
  41. Zamudio-Fernandez J., Okan A., Villaescusa-Navarro F., Bilaloglu S., Derin Cengiz A., He S., Perreault Levasseur L., Ho S., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1904.12846 · arXiv
  42. Zhang X., Wang Y., Zhang W., Sun Y., He S., Contardo G., VillaescusaNavarro F., Ho S., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1902.05965 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernardini, M., Feldmann, R., Anglés-Alcázar, D., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J., Mayer, L., & Stadel, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Department of Physics, University of Connecticut , 196 Auditorium Road, U-3046, Storrs, CT 06269-3046, USA
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Bernardini, M
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2021-10-25
Volume
509
Issue
1
Pages
1323-1341
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3208715870
Cited by
26
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (157591, 194814)
  • NSF (AST-2009687, AST-1910346, AST-1752913)
  • Simons Foundation
  • NASA (NNX17AG29G, HST-AR-15006, HST-AR-15809, HST-GO-15658, HST-GO-15901, HST-GO-15902, HST-AR-16159, HST-GO-16226, NAS5-26555)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center
  • National Science Foundation (OAC-1818253)
  • Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (s697, s698)
  • University of Zurich (uzh18)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
dark matter simulations, deep learning emulator, Wasserstein GAN, U-Net, gas density, FIRE project, upsampling, HI column density, dark matter halos, abundance matching, structure formation, computational complexity reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review