The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrogen reionization ends by z = 5.3: Lyman-α optical depth measured by the XQR-30 sample
Open accessAbstract
The presence of excess scatter in the Ly-α forest at z ∼ 5.5, together with the existence of sporadic extended opaque Gunn-Peterson troughs, has started to provide robust evidence for a late end of hydrogen reionization. However, low data quality and systematic uncertainties complicate the use of Ly-α transmission as a precision probe of reionization’s end stages. In this paper, we assemble a sample of 67 quasar sightlines at z > 5.5 with high signal-to-noise ratios of >10 per ≤15 km s−1 spectral pixel, relying largely on the new XQR-30 quasar sample. XQR-30 is a large program on VLT/X-Shooter which obtained deep (SNR > 20 per pixel) spectra of 30 quasars at z > 5.7. We carefully account for systematics in continuum reconstruction, instrumentation, and contamination by damped Ly-α systems. We present improved measurements of the mean Ly-α transmission over 4.9 < z < 6.1. Using all known systematics in a forward modelling analysis, we find excellent agreement between the observed Ly-α transmission distributions and the homogeneous-UVB simulations Sherwood and Nyx up to z ≤ 5.2 (<1σ), and mild tension (∼2.5σ) at z = 5.3. Homogeneous UVB models are ruled out by excess Ly-α transmission scatter at z ≥ 5.4 with high confidence (>3.5σ). Our results indicate that reionization-related fluctuations, whether in the UVB, residual neutral hydrogen fraction, and/or IGM temperature, persist in the intergalactic medium until at least z = 5.3 (t = 1.1 Gyr after the big bang). This is further evidence for a late end to reionization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy
The Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., Greenfield, P., Droettboom, M., Bray, E., Aldcroft, T., Davis, M., Ginsburg, A., Price-Whelan, A. M., et al. (2013) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 · Cited by 14,620
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 · Cited by 14,258
The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. (2011) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2011.37 · Cited by 9,381
The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package*
The Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., Günther, H. M., Lim, P. L., Crawford, S. M., Conseil, S., Shupe, D. L., Craig, M. W., Dencheva, N., et al. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f · Cited by 7,687
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing
Perez, F., & Granger, B. E. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.53 · Cited by 4,009
THE BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY OF SDSS-III
Dawson, K. S., Schlegel, D. J., Ahn, C. P., Anderson, S. F., Aubourg, É., Bailey, S., Barkhouser, R. H., Bautista, J. E., Beifiori, A., Berlind, A. A., et al. (2013) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/1/10 · Cited by 2,051
Self-citationAn optimal extraction algorithm for CCD spectroscopy
Horne, K. (1986) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/131801 · Cited by 1,923
HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope:
Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., Bresee, L., Brown, W. E., Cantrall, T., Conrad, A., Couture, M., Delaney, C., Epps, H. W., et al. (1994) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.176725 · Cited by 1,606
Cited by
What drives the growth of black holes: A decade of progress
Alexander, D. M., Hickox, R. C., Aird, J., Combes, F., Costa, T., Habouzit, M., Harrison, C. M., Leng, R. I., Morabito, L. K., Uckelman, S. L., et al. (2025) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2025.101733 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Becker, G. D., Keating, L. C., Davies, R. L., Zhu, Y., Eilers, A.-C., D’Odorico, V., Bian, F., Bischetti, M., Cristiani, S. V., Fan, X., Farina, E. P., Haehnelt, M. G., Hennawi, J. F., Kulkarni, G., Mesinger, A., Meyer, R. A., Onoue, M., Pallottini, A., Qin, Y., Ryan-Weber, E., Schindler, J.-T., Walter, F., Wang, F., & Yang, J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-06-07
- Volume
- 514
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-76
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W4225921670
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 25.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen reionization ends by z = 5.3: Lyman-α optical depth measured by the XQR-30 sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stac1046
- The paper
- Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Becker, G. D., Keating, L. C., Davies, R. L., Zhu, Y., Eilers, A.-C., D’Odorico, V., Bian, F., Bischetti, M., Cristiani, S. V., Fan, X., Farina, E. P., Haehnelt, M. G., Hennawi, J. F., Kulkarni, G., Mesinger, A., Meyer, R. A., Onoue, M., . . . Yang, J. (2022). Hydrogen reionization ends by z = 5.3: Lyman-α optical depth measured by the XQR-30 sample. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.