Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dependence of galaxy quenching on halo mass and distance from its centre

Open access
Woo, Joanna, Dekel, Avishai, Faber, S. M., Noeske, Kai, Koo, David C., Gerke, Brian F., Cooper, Michael C., Salim, Samir, Dutton, Aaron A., Newman, Jeffrey, Weiner, Benjamin J., Bundy, Kevin, Willmer, Christopher N. A., Davis, Marc, Yan, Renbin·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We study the dependence of star formation quenching on galaxy mass and environment, in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; z ∼ 0.1) and the All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS; z ∼ 1). It is crucial that we define quenching by low star formation rate rather than by red colour, given that one-third of the red galaxies are star forming. We address stellar mass M*, halo mass Mh, density over the nearest N neighbours δN and distance to the halo centre D. The fraction of quenched galaxies appears more strongly correlated with Mh at fixed M* than with M* at fixed Mh, while for satellites quenching also depends on D. We present the M*–Mh relation for centrals at z ∼ 1. At z ∼ 1, the dependence of quenching on M* at fixed Mh is somewhat more pronounced than at z ∼ 0, but the quenched fraction is low (10 per cent) and the haloes are less massive. For satellites, M*-dependent quenching is noticeable at high D, suggesting a quenching dependence on subhalo mass for recently captured satellites. At small D, where satellites likely fell in more than a few Gyr ago, quenching strongly depends on Mh and not on M*. The Mh dependence of quenching is consistent with theoretical wisdom where virial shock heating in massive haloes shuts down accretion and triggers ram-pressure stripping, causing quenching. The interpretation of δN is complicated by the fact that it depends on the number of observed group members compared to N, motivating the use of D as a better measure of local environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sts274

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Woo, J., Dekel, A., Faber, S. M., Noeske, K., Koo, D. C., Gerke, B. F., Cooper, M. C., Salim, S., Dutton, A. A., Newman, J., Weiner, B. J., Bundy, K., Willmer, C. N. A., Davis, M., & Yan, R.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2012-11-22
Volume
428
Issue
4
Pages
3306-3326
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2145002594
Cited by
226
References
3
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dependence of galaxy quenching on halo mass and distance from its centre. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sts274
The paper
Woo, J., Dekel, A., Faber, S. M., Noeske, K., Koo, D. C., Gerke, B. F., Cooper, M. C., Salim, S., Dutton, A. A., Newman, J., Weiner, B. J., Bundy, K., Willmer, C. N. A., Davis, M., & Yan, R. (2013). Dependence of galaxy quenching on halo mass and distance from its centre. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts274

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.