The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project
Open accessAbstract
Future weak lensing surveys potentially hold the highest statistical power for constraining cosmological parameters compared to other cosmological probes. The statistical power of a weak lensing survey is determined by the sky coverage, the inverse of the noise in shear measurements and the galaxy number density. The combination of the latter two factors is often expressed in terms of neff – the ‘effective number density of galaxies used for weak lensing measurements’. In this work, we estimate neff for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) project, the most powerful ground-based lensing survey planned for the next two decades. We investigate how the following factors affect the resulting neff of the survey with detailed simulations: (1) survey time, (2) shear measurement algorithm, (3) algorithm for combining multiple exposures, (4) inclusion of data from multiple filter bands, (5) redshift distribution of the galaxies and (6) masking and blending. For the first time, we quantify in a general weak lensing analysis pipeline the sensitivity of neff to the above factors. We find that with current weak lensing algorithms, expected distributions of observing parameters, and all lensing data (r and i band, covering 18 000 degree2 of sky) for LSST, neff ≈ 37 arcmin−2 before considering blending and masking, neff ≈ 31 arcmin−2 when rejecting seriously blended galaxies and neff ≈ 26 arcmin−2 when considering an additional 15 per cent loss of galaxies due to masking. With future improvements in weak lensing algorithms, these values could be expected to increase by up to 20 per cent. Throughout the paper, we also stress the ways in which neff depends on our ability to understand and control systematic effects in the measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars
Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A. R., Frenk, C. S., Yoshida, N., Gao, L., Navarro, J. F., Thacker, R. J., Croton, D., Helly, J. C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03597 · Cited by 5,060
LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2008) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0805.2366 · Cited by 4,357
Self-citationBartelmann, M., & Schneider, P. (2001) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00082-x · Cited by 2,611
A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter
Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Markevitch, M., Randall, S. W., Jones, C., & Zaritsky, D. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/508162 · Cited by 2,470
Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies
Kron, R. G. (1980) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/190669 · Cited by 1,054
The formation history of elliptical galaxies
Lucia, G. D., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Croton, D., & Kauffmann, G. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09879.x · Cited by 1,008
A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
Kaiser, N., Squires, G. K., & Broadhurst, T. J. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176071 · Cited by 792
CFHTLenS: the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
Heymans, C., Waerbeke, L. V., Miller, L., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T., Mellier, Y., Simon, P., Bonnett, C., et al. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21952.x · Cited by 718
Heymans, C., Grocutt, E., Heavens, A., Kilbinger, M., Kitching, T. D., Simpson, F., Benjamin, J., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt601 · Cited by 649
The Milky Way Tomography with SDSS. II. Stellar Metallicity
Ivezić, Ž., Sesar, B., Jurić, M., Bond, N., Dalcanton, J., Rockosi, C. M., Yanny, B., Newberg, H. J., Beers, T. C., Allende Prieto, C., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/589678 · Cited by 566
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1996, AAS, 117, 393
- 2008, J COSMOL ASTROPART PHYS, 1, 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
Self-citationThe Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts
Ade, P. A. R., Aguirre, J., Ahmed, Z., Aiola, S., Ali, A., Alonso, D., Alvarez, M. A., Arnold, K., Ashton, P., Austermann, J. E., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056 · Cited by 1,524
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 817
The Connection Between Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos
Wechsler, R. H., & Tinker, J. L. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756 · Cited by 988
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
Troxel, M., MacCrann, N., Zuntz, J., Eifler, T., Krause, E., Dodelson, S., Gruen, D., Blazek, J., Friedrich, O., Samuroff, S., et al. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043528 · Cited by 427
Self-citationCosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
Hikage, C., Oguri, M., Hamana, T., More, S., Mandelbaum, R., Takada, M., Köhlinger, F., Miyatake, H., Nishizawa, A. J., Aihara, H., et al. (2019) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/psz010 · Cited by 657
Gravitational lensing analysis of the Kilo-Degree Survey
Kuijken, K. H., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., Nakajima, R., Erben, T., de Jong, J. T. A., Viola, M., Choi, A., Hoekstra, H., Miller, L., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2140 · Cited by 420
Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
Mandelbaum, R. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928 · Cited by 409
Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Raveri, M., Campos, A., Amon, A., Chen, A., Doux, C., et al. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023515 · Cited by 388
Self-citationCore Cosmology Library: Precision Cosmological Predictions for LSST
Chisari, N. E., Alonso, D., Krause, E., Leonard, C. D., Bull, P., Neveu, J., Villarreal, A., Singh, S., McClintock, T., Ellison, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab1658 · Cited by 371
Self-citationZitrin, A., Fabris, A., Merten, J., Melchior, P., Meneghetti, M., Koekemoer, A. M., Coe, D., Maturi, M., Bartelmann, M., Postman, M., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/44 · Cited by 283
Hamana, T., Shirasaki, M., Miyazaki, S., Hikage, C., Oguri, M., More, S., Armstrong, R., Leauthaud, A., Mandelbaum, R., Miyatake, H., et al. (2019) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/psz138 · Cited by 269
cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys
Krause, E., & Eifler, T. F. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1261 · Cited by 295
Beyond linear galaxy alignments
Blazek, J., MacCrann, N., Troxel, M. A., & Fang, X. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.103506 · Cited by 221
Lensing is low: cosmology, galaxy formation or new physics?
Leauthaud, A., Saito, S., Hilbert, S., Barreira, A., More, S., White, M. J., Alam, S., Behroozi, P., Bundy, K. A., Coupon, J., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx258 · Cited by 220
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues
Zuntz, J., Sheldon, E., Samuroff, S., Troxel, M., Jarvis, M., MacCrann, N., Gruen, D., Prat, J., Sánchez, C., Choi, A., et al. (2017) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2219 · Cited by 143
Self-citationThe DES Science Verification weak lensing shear catalogues
Jarvis, M., Sheldon, E. S., Zuntz, J., Kacprzak, T., Bridle, S., Amara, A., Armstrong, R., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bonnett, C., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw990 · Cited by 187
Self-citationTakahashi, R., Hamana, T., Shirasaki, M., Namikawa, T., Nishimichi, T., Osato, K., & Shiroyama, K. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa943d · Cited by 192
Dark energy survey year 3 results: weak lensing shape catalogue
Gatti, M., Sheldon, E. S., Amon, A., Becker, M. R., Troxel, M. A., Choi, A., Doux, C., MacCrann, N., Navarro-Alsina, A., Harrison, I., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab918 · Cited by 183
Self-citationDark matter halo properties of GAMA galaxy groups from 100 square degrees of KiDS weak lensing data
Viola, M. G., Cacciato, M., Brouwer, M. M., Kuijken, K. H., Hoekstra, H., Norberg, P., Robotham, A. S. G., van Uitert, E., Alpaslan, M., Baldry, I. K., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1447 · Cited by 163
Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions
Li, X., Zhang, T., Sugiyama, S., Dalal, R., Terasawa, R., Rau, M. M., Mandelbaum, R., Takada, M., More, S., Strauss, M. A., et al. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.123518 · Cited by 152
Cosmological constraints with deep learning from KiDS-450 weak lensing maps
Fluri, J., Kacprzak, T., Lucchi, A., Refregier, A., Amara, A., Hofmann, T., & Schneider, A. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063514 · Cited by 151
The impact of intrinsic alignment on current and future cosmic shear surveys
Krause, E., Eifler, T. F., & Blazek, J. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2615 · Cited by 136
Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning
Gupta, A., Matilla, J. M. Z., Hsu, D., & Haiman, Z. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103515 · Cited by 128
Imprint of inflation on galaxy shape correlations
Schmidt, F., Chisari, N. E., & Dvorkin, C. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/10/032 · Cited by 121
Modelling baryonic physics in future weak lensing surveys
Huang, H.-J., Eifler, T. F., Mandelbaum, R., & Dodelson, S. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1714 · Cited by 114
Eifler, T. F., Krause, E., Dodelson, S., Zentner, A. R., Hearin, A. P., & Gnedin, N. Y. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2000 · Cited by 111
The stellar-to-halo mass relation of GAMA galaxies from 100 deg 2 of KiDS weak lensing data
van Uitert, E., Cacciato, M., Hoekstra, H., Brouwer, M. M., Sifón, C., Viola, M. G., Baldry, I. K., Bland‐Hawthorn, J., Brough, S., Brown, M. J. I., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw747 · Cited by 107
Deblending and classifying astronomical sources with Mask R-CNN deep learning
Burke, C., Aleo, P., Chen, Y.-C., Liu, X., Peterson, J., Sembroski, G., & Lin, J. (2019) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2845 · Cited by 78
Self-citationRCSLenS: The Red Cluster Sequence Lensing Survey
Hildebrandt, H., Choi, A., Heymans, C., Blake, C., Erben, T., Miller, L., Nakajima, R., Waerbeke, L. V., Viola, M., Buddendiek, A., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2013 · Cited by 92
Intrinsic alignments of galaxies in the MassiveBlack-II simulation: analysis of two-point statistics
Tenneti, A., Singh, S., Mandelbaum, R., Matteo, T. D., Feng, Y., & Khandai, N. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv272 · Cited by 85
Schaan, E., Krause, E., Eifler, T. F., Doré, O., Miyatake, H., Rhodes, J. D., & Spergel, D. N. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.123512 · Cited by 85
Cosmological constraints from noisy convergence maps through deep learning
Fluri, J., Kacprzak, T., Refregier, A., Amara, A., Lucchi, A., & Hofmann, T. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.123518 · Cited by 83
The three-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey
Li, X., Miyatake, H., Luo, W., More, S., Oguri, M., Hamana, T., Mandelbaum, R., Shirasaki, M., Takada, M., Armstrong, R., et al. (2022) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/psac006 · Cited by 83
Harnois-Déraps, J., Martinet, N., Castro, T., Dolag, K., Giblin, B., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., & Xia, Q. (2020) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1623 · Cited by 38
An improved cosmological parameter inference scheme motivated by deep learning
Ribli, D., Pataki, B., & Csabai, I. (2018) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0596-8 · Cited by 60
Cosmological simulations for combined-probe analyses: covariance and neighbour-exclusion bias
Harnois-Déraps, J., Amon, A., Choi, A., Demchenko, V., Heymans, C., Kannawadi, A., Nakajima, R., Sirks, E., Waerbeke, L. V., Cai, Y.-C., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2319 · Cited by 77
On the road to per cent accuracy IV: ReACT – computing the non-linear power spectrum beyond ΛCDM
Bose, B., Cataneo, M., Tröster, T., Xia, Q., Heymans, C., & Lombriser, L. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2696 · Cited by 75
Accurate cosmic shear errors: do we need ensembles of simulations?
Barreira, A., Krause, E., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/053 · Cited by 74
Blake, C., Joudaki, S., Heymans, C., Choi, A., Erben, T., Harnois-Deraps, J., Hildebrandt, H., Joachimi, B., Nakajima, R., van Waerbeke, L., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2875 · Cited by 80
An accurate and practical method for inference of weak gravitational lensing from galaxy images
Bernstein, G. M., Armstrong, R., Krawiec, C., & March, M. C. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw879 · Cited by 72
Multitracing anisotropic non-Gaussianity with galaxy shapes
Chisari, N. E., Dvorkin, C., Schmidt, F., & Spergel, D. N. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.123507 · Cited by 68
On the probability distributions of ellipticity
Viola, M. G., Kitching, T., & Joachimi, B. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu071 · Cited by 67
THE ELLIPTICITY DISTRIBUTION OF AMBIGUOUSLY BLENDED OBJECTS
Dawson, W. A., Schneider, M. D., Tyson, J. A., & Jee, M. J. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/11 · Cited by 64
Neutrino masses and beyond- ΛCDM cosmology with LSST and future CMB experiments
Mishra-Sharma, S., Alonso, D., & Dunkley, J. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.123544 · Cited by 62
The masses of satellites in GAMA galaxy groups from 100 square degrees of KiDS weak lensing data
Sifón, C., Cacciato, M., Hoekstra, H., Brouwer, M. M., van Uitert, E., Viola, M. G., Baldry, I. K., Brough, S., Brown, M. J. I., Choi, A., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2051 · Cited by 60
Samuroff, S., Bridle, S., Zuntz, J., Troxel, M. A., Gruen, D., Rollins, R. P., Bernstein, G. M., Eifler, T. F., Huff, E., Kacprzak, T., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3282 · Cited by 56
Self-citationFull wCDM analysis of KiDS-1000 weak lensing maps using deep learning
Fluri, J., Kacprzak, T., Lucchi, A., Schneider, A., Réfrégier, A., & Hofmann, T. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.083518 · Cited by 21
Primordial gravitational waves from galaxy intrinsic alignments
Biagetti, M., & Orlando, G. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/005 · Cited by 54
Deblending galaxy superpositions with branched generative adversarial networks
Reiman, D., & Göhre, B. E. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz575 · Cited by 52
Imprint of inflation on galaxy shape correlations
Schmidt, F., Chisari, N. E., Dvorkin, C., ElemPart, S. S. T. C. A., & Physics, T. (2015) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 51
Towards precision constraints on gravity with the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure
Bose, B., Koyama, K., Lewandowski, M., Vernizzi, F., & Winther, H. A. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/063 · Cited by 57
Galaxy imaging surveys as spin-sensitive detector for cosmological colliders
Kogai, K., Akitsu, K., Schmidt, F., & Urakawa, Y. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/060 · Cited by 48
KiDS-1000: Cosmology with improved cosmic shear measurements
Li, S., Hoekstra, H., Kuijken, K. H., Asgari, M., Bilicki, M., Giblin, B., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., Joachimi, B., Miller, L., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347236 · Cited by 47
Neutrino mass without cosmic variance
Loverde, M. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.103526 · Cited by 45
Miyatake, H., Sugiyama, S., Takada, M., Nishimichi, T., Shirasaki, M., Kobayashi, Y., Mandelbaum, R., More, S., Oguri, M., Osato, K., et al. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.083520 · Cited by 44
The one-loop matter bispectrum as a probe of gravity and dark energy
Bose, B., & Taruya, A. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/019 · Cited by 42
Li, S., Kuijken, K. H., Hoekstra, H., Miller, L., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., van den Busch, J. L., Wright, A. H., Yoon, M., Bilicki, M., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245210 · Cited by 39
Cosmology from weak lensing peaks and minima with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey first-year data
Marques, G. A., Liu, J., Shirasaki, M., Thiele, L., Grandón, D., Huffenberger, K. M., Cheng, S., Harnois-Déraps, J., Osato, K., & Coulton, W. R. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae098 · Cited by 39
IMPACT OF ATMOSPHERIC CHROMATIC EFFECTS ON WEAK LENSING MEASUREMENTS
Meyers, J. M., & Burchat, P. R. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/182 · Cited by 39
Machine learning for observational cosmology
Moriwaki, K., Nishimichi, T., & Yoshida, N. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acd2ea · Cited by 52
Strongly lensed gravitational waves and electromagnetic signals as powerful cosmic rulers
Wei, J.-J., & Wu, X.-F. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2210 · Cited by 35
KiDS-i-800: comparing weak gravitational lensing measurements from same-sky surveys
Amon, A., Heymans, C., Klaes, D., Erben, T., Blake, C., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kuijken, K. H., Miller, L., Morrison, C., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty859 · Cited by 33
Intrinsic galaxy alignment from angular dependent primordial non-Gaussianity
Kogai, K., Matsubara, T., Nishizawa, A. J., & Urakawa, Y. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/014 · Cited by 32
Joseph, R., Courbin, F., & Starck, J.-L. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527923 · Cited by 31
A COMPARISON OF COSMOLOGICAL MODELS USING TIME DELAY LENSES
Wei, J.-J., Wu, X.-F., & Melia, F. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/2/190 · Cited by 30
The challenge of blending in large sky surveys
Melchior, P., Joseph, R., Sanchez, J., MacCrann, N., & Gruen, D. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00353-y · Cited by 30
Intrinsic galaxy alignment from angular dependent primordial non-Gaussianity
Kogai, K., Matsubara, T., Nishizawa, A. J., & Urakawa, Y. (2018) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 30
The Signatures of Self-interacting Dark Matter and Subhalo Disruption on Cluster Substructure
Bhattacharyya, J., Adhikari, S., Banerjee, A., More, S., Kumar, A., Nadler, E. O., & Chatterjee, S. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac68e9 · Cited by 29
Natarajan, A., Zentner, A. R., Battaglia, N., & Trac, H. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.063516 · Cited by 29
Contamination of early-type galaxy alignments to galaxy lensing–CMB lensing cross-correlation
Chisari, N. E., Dunkley, J., Miller, L., & Allison, R. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1655 · Cited by 28
Lin, C.-H., Harnois-Déraps, J., Eifler, T. F., Pospisil, T., Mandelbaum, R., Lee, A. B., & Singh, S. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2948 · Cited by 28
Galaxy bias in the era of LSST: perturbative bias expansions
Nicola, A., Hadzhiyska, B., Findlay, N., García-García, C., Alonso, D., Slosar, A., Guo, Z., Kokron, N., Angulo, R. E., Avilés, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/02/015 · Cited by 27
Self-citationGalaxy shape statistics in the effective field theory
Vlah, Z., Chisari, N. E., & Schmidt, F. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/061 · Cited by 27
Joseph, R., Courbin, F., & Starck, J. (2016) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527923/pdf · Cited by 26
Monte Carlo control loops for cosmic shear cosmology with DES Year 1 data
Kacprzak, T., Herbel, J., Nicola, A., Sgier, R., Tarsitano, F., Bruderer, C., Amara, A., Réfrégier, A., Bridle, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.082003 · Cited by 20
Self-citationConsistency of cosmic shear analyses in harmonic and real space
Doux, C., Chang, C., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Fang, X., Gatti, M., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Samuroff, S., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab661 · Cited by 24
Self-citationThe impact of baryonic physics and massive neutrinos on weak lensing peak statistics
Fong, M., Choi, M., Catlett, V. E., Lee, B., Peel, A., Bowyer, R., King, L. J., & McCarthy, I. G. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1882 · Cited by 24
How to Obtain the Redshift Distribution from Probabilistic Redshift Estimates
Malz, A. I., & Hogg, D. W. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac062f · Cited by 23
Terasawa, R., Li, X., Takada, M., Nishimichi, T., Tanaka, S., Sugiyama, S., Kurita, T., Zhang, T., Shirasaki, M., Takahashi, R., et al. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063509 · Cited by 23
Pace, F., Schimd, C., Mota, D. F., & Popolo, A. D. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/060 · Cited by 23
Three-point galaxy-galaxy lensing as a probe of dark matter halo shapes
Adhikari, S., Chue, C. Y. R., & Dalal, N. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/009 · Cited by 23
Sánchez, J., Mendoza, I., Kirkby, D. P., & Burchat, P. R. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/043 · Cited by 22
Self-citationTowards a full wCDM map-based analysis for weak lensing surveys
Zürcher, D., Fluri, J., Ajani, V., Fischbacher, S., Refregier, A. R., & Kacprzak, T. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2212 · Cited by 24
Sugiyama, S., Takada, M., Miyatake, H., Nishimichi, T., Shirasaki, M., Kobayashi, Y., Mandelbaum, R., More, S., Takahashi, R., Osato, K., et al. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.123537 · Cited by 21
Yao, J., Shan, H., Li, R., Xu, Y., Fan, D., Liu, D., Zhang, P., Yu, Y., Wei, C., Hu, B., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3563 · Cited by 23
Cross-correlating 21 cm and galaxy surveys: implications for cosmology and astrophysics
Padmanabhan, H., Refregier, A. R., & Amara, A. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1373 · Cited by 20
Modelling the matter bispectrum at small scales in modified gravity
Bose, B., Byun, J., Lacasa, F., Dizgah, A. M., & Lombriser, L. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/02/025 · Cited by 20
Mesh-free free-form lensing – I. Methodology and application to mass reconstruction
Merten, J. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1413 · Cited by 19
Bayesian photometric redshifts of blended sources
Jones, D. M., & Heavens, A. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3279 · Cited by 19
Galaxy shape measurement with convolutional neural networks
Ribli, D., Dobos, L., & Csabai, I. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2374 · Cited by 19
Avoiding baryonic feedback effects on neutrino mass measurements from CMB lensing
McCarthy, F., Foreman, S., & van Engelen, A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103538 · Cited by 19
Duncan, C. A. J., Harnois-Déraps, J., Miller, L., & Langedijk, A. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1809 · Cited by 18
Mahony, C., Fortuna, M. C., Joachimi, B., Korn, A. J., Hoekstra, H., Schmidt, S. J., Alonso, D., Singh, S., Ricci, M., Hildebrandt, H., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac872 · Cited by 18
Zhang, T., Li, X., Dalal, R., Mandelbaum, R., Strauss, M. A., Kannawadi, A., Miyatake, H., Nicola, A., Plazas, A. A., Shirasaki, M., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1801 · Cited by 15
Measuring the scale dependence of intrinsic alignments using multiple shear estimates
Leonard, C. D., & Mandelbaum, R. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1444 · Cited by 15
The Scales of Gravitational Lensing
Paolis, F. D., Giordano, M., INGROSSO, G., Manni, L., Nucita, A., & Strafella, F. (2016) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe2010006 · Cited by 14
Weak-lensing study in VOICE survey – I. Shear measurement
Fu, L., Liu, D., Radovich, M., Liu, X., Pan, C., Fan, Z., Covone, G., Vaccari, M., Amaro, V., Brescia, M., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1579 · Cited by 14
Weak lensing shear estimation beyond the shape-noise limit: a machine learning approach
Springer, O., Ofek, E. O., Weiss, Y., & Merten, J. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2991 · Cited by 16
Galaxy blending effects in deep imaging cosmic shear probes of cosmology
Nourbakhsh, E., Tyson, T., Schmidt, S. J., Armstrong, B., Burchat, P. R., & Sánchez, J. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1303 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, C., Jarvis, M., Jain, B., Kahn, S. M., Kirkby, D., Connolly, A., Krughoff, S., Peng, E. H., & Peterson, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-19
- Volume
- 434
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2121-2135
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2023217969
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DE-SC0007901, 0809409)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-76-SFO0515, DESC0007901, DE-AC02-)
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Keywords
- weak gravitational lensing, LSST, shear measurement, galaxy blending, redshift distribution, multi-band imaging, cosmological parameter constraints, statistical power, systematic effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review