The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A 2.5 per cent measurement of the growth rate from small-scale redshift space clustering of SDSS-III CMASS galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We perform the first fit to the anisotropic clustering of Sloan Digital Sky Survey III CMASS data release 10 galaxies on scales of ∼0.8–32 h−1 Mpc. A standard halo occupation distribution model evaluated near the best-fitting Planck Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmology provides a good fit to the observed anisotropic clustering, and implies a normalization for the peculiar velocity field of M ∼ 2 × 1013h−1 M⊙ haloes of fσ8(z = 0.57) = 0.450 ± 0.011. Since this constraint includes both quasi-linear and non-linear scales, it should severely constrain modified gravity models that enhance pairwise infall velocities on these scales. Though model dependent, our measurement represents a factor of 2.5 improvement in precision over the analysis of DR11 on large scales, fσ8(z = 0.57) = 0.447 ± 0.028, and is the tightest single constraint on the growth rate of cosmic structure to date. Our measurement is consistent with the Planck ΛCDM prediction of 0.480 ± 0.010 at the ∼1.9σ level. Assuming a halo mass function evaluated at the best-fitting Planck cosmology, we also find that 10 per cent of CMASS galaxies are satellites in haloes of mass M ∼ 6 × 1013h−1 M⊙. While none of our tests and model generalizations indicate systematic errors due to an insufficiently detailed model of the galaxy–halo connection, the precision of these first results warrant further investigation into the modelling uncertainties and degeneracies with cosmological parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Cited by
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Self-citationDesjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead
Bull, P., Akrami, Y., Adamek, J., Baker, T., Bellini, E., Beltrán Jiménez, J., Bentivegna, E., Camera, S., Clesse, S., Davis, J. H., et al. (2016) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2016.02.001 · Cited by 567
Beutler, F., Seo, H.-J., Ross, A. J., McDonald, P., Saito, S., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Chuang, C.-H., Cuesta, A. J., Eisenstein, D. J., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2373 · Cited by 267
Self-citationObservational future of cosmological scalar-tensor theories
Alonso, D., Bellini, E., Ferreira, P. G., & Zumalacárregui, M. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.063502 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Reid, B. A., Seo, H.-J., Leauthaud, A., Tinker, J. L., & White, M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 444
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 476-502
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2100213110
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 2.5 per cent measurement of the growth rate from small-scale redshift space clustering of SDSS-III CMASS galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stu1391
- The paper
- Reid, B. A., Seo, H.-J., Leauthaud, A., Tinker, J. L., & White, M. (2014). A 2.5 per cent measurement of the growth rate from small-scale redshift space clustering of SDSS-III CMASS galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.