Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mass evolution of the first galaxies: stellar mass functions and star formation rates at 4 < z < 7 in the CANDELS GOODS-South field

Open access
Duncan, K., Conselice, C. J., Mortlock, A., Hartley, W. G., Guo, Y., Ferguson, H. C., Dave, R., Lu, Y., Ownsworth, J., Ashby, M. L. N., Dekel, A., Dickinson, M., Faber, S., Giavalisco, M., Grogin, N., Kocevski, D., Koekemoer, A., Somerville, R. S., White, C. E.·2014·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We measure new estimates for the galaxy stellar mass function and star formation rates for samples of galaxies at z ∼ 4, 5, 6 and 7 using data in the CANDELS GOODS South field. The deep near-infrared observations allow us to construct the stellar mass function at z ≥ 6 directly for the first time. We estimate stellar masses for our sample by fitting the observed spectral energy distributions with synthetic stellar populations, including nebular line and continuum emission. The observed UV luminosity functions for the samples are consistent with previous observations; however, we find that the observed MUV-M* relation has a shallow slope more consistent with a constant mass-to-light ratio and a normalization which evolves with redshift. Our stellar mass functions have steep low-mass slopes (α ≈ −1.9), steeper than previously observed at these redshifts and closer to that of the UV luminosity function. Integrating our new mass functions, we find the observed stellar mass density evolves from |$\log _{10} \rho _{*} = 6.64^{+0.58}_{-0.89}$| at z ∼ 7 to 7.36 ± 0.06 M⊙ Mpc− 3 at z ∼ 4. Finally, combining the measured UV continuum slopes (β) with their rest-frame UV luminosities, we calculate dust-corrected star formation rates (SFR) for our sample. We find the specific SFR for a fixed stellar mass increases with redshift whilst the global SFR density falls rapidly over this period. Our new SFR density estimates are higher than previously observed at this redshift.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stu1622

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Duncan, K., Conselice, C. J., Mortlock, A., Hartley, W. G., Guo, Y., Ferguson, H. C., Dave, R., Lu, Y., Ownsworth, J., Ashby, M. L. N., Dekel, A., Dickinson, M., Faber, S., Giavalisco, M., Grogin, N., Kocevski, D., Koekemoer, A., Somerville, R. S., & White, C. E.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
444
Issue
3
Pages
2960-2984
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2037526471
Cited by
292
References
1
FWCI
18.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mass evolution of the first galaxies: stellar mass functions and star formation rates at 4 < z < 7 in the CANDELS GOODS-South field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stu1622
The paper
Duncan, K., Conselice, C. J., Mortlock, A., Hartley, W. G., Guo, Y., Ferguson, H. C., Dave, R., Lu, Y., Ownsworth, J., Ashby, M. L. N., Dekel, A., Dickinson, M., Faber, S., Giavalisco, M., Grogin, N., Kocevski, D., Koekemoer, A., Somerville, R. S., & White, C. E. (2014). The mass evolution of the first galaxies: stellar mass functions and star formation rates at 4 < z < 7 in the CANDELS GOODS-South field. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1622

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.