Cross-sections for planetary systems interacting with passing stars and binaries
Open accessAbstract
Most planetary systems are formed within stellar clusters, and these environments can shape their properties. This paper considers scattering encounters between solar systems and passing cluster members, and calculates the corresponding interaction cross-sections. The target solar systems are generally assumed to have four giant planets, with a variety of starting states, including circular orbits with the semimajor axes of our planets, a more compact configuration, an ultracompact state with multiple mean motion resonances, and systems with massive planets. We then consider the effects of varying the cluster velocity dispersion, the relative importance of binaries versus single stars, different stellar host masses, and finite starting eccentricities of the planetary orbits. For each state of the initial system, we perform an ensemble of numerical scattering experiments and determine the cross-sections for eccentricity increase, inclination angle increase, planet ejection, and capture. This paper reports results from over 2 million individual scattering simulations. Using supporting analytic considerations, and fitting functions to the numerical results, we find a universal formula that gives the cross-sections as a function of stellar host mass, cluster velocity dispersion, starting planetary orbital radius, and final eccentricity. The resulting cross-sections can be used in a wide variety of applications. As one example, we revisit constraints on the birth aggregate of our Solar system due to dynamical scattering and find N ≲ 104 (consistent with previous estimates).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a working estimate, orbiting bodies with semi-major axis a > 30,000 AU are likely to be stripped from the Sun by passing stars in the field.
“As a working estimate, orbiting bodies with semi-major axis a > 30 ; 000 AU are likely to be stripped from the sun by passing stars in the field (or at least have their orbital elements drastically altered), as marked by the dashed line in the Figure.”
From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Li and Adams, 2015
Cites
Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity
Kozai, Y. (1962) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/108790 · Cited by 2,588 · see citing works
Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar System
Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03539 · Cited by 1,476 · see citing works
The Birth Environment of the Solar System
Adams, F. C. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130830 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Brown, M. E., & Becker, J. C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
“This outer boundary is not sharp, and this process must be addressed statistically (Li and Adams, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationINTERACTION CROSS SECTIONS AND SURVIVAL RATES FOR PROPOSED SOLAR SYSTEM MEMBER PLANET NINE
Li, G., & Adams, F. C. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/l3 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Demographics of Rocky Free-floating Planets and their Detectability by WFIRST
Barclay, T., Quintana, E. V., Raymond, S. N., & Penny, M. T. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa705b · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Dynamics of Planetary Systems within Star Clusters: Aspects of the Solar System’s Early Evolution
Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Batygin, Y. K., & Petigura, E. A. (2020) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab665d · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Li, G., & Adams, F. C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Adams, Fred C.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-05
- Volume
- 448
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 344-363
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3010432670
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Smithsonian Institution
- Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- interaction cross sections, star clusters, binary stars, planet ejection, orbital inclination, giant planets, mean motion resonance, cluster velocity dispersion, planetary system formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review