Universality of dark matter haloes shape over six decades in mass: insights from the Millennium XXL and SBARBINE simulations
Open accessAbstract
For the last 30 yr many observational and theoretical evidences have shown that galaxy clusters are not spherical objects, and that their shape is much better described by a triaxial geometry. With the advent of multiwavelength data of increasing quality, triaxial investigations of galaxy clusters is gathering a growing interest from the community, especially in the time of ‘precision cosmology’. In this work, we aim to provide the first statistically significant predictions in the unexplored mass range above 3 × 1014 M⊙h−1, using haloes from two redshift snapshots (z = 0 and z = 1) of the Millennium XXL simulation. The size of this cosmological dark matter-only simulation (4.1 Gpc) allows the formation of a statistically significant number of massive cluster scale haloes (≈500 with M > 2× 1015 M⊙ h−1, and 780 000 with M > 1014 M⊙ h−1). Besides, we aim to extend this investigation to lower masses in order to look for universal predictions across nearly six orders of magnitude in mass, from 1010 to almost 1016 M⊙ h−1. For this purpose we use the SBARBINE simulations, allowing us to model haloes of masses starting from ≈1010 M⊙ h−1. We use an elliptical overdensity method to select haloes and compute the shapes of the unimodal ones (approximately 50 per cent), while we discard the more unrelaxed. The minor to major and intermediate to major axis ratio distributions are found to be well described by simple universal functional forms that do not depend on cosmology or redshift. Our results extend the findings of Jing & Suto to a higher precision and a wider range of mass. This ‘recipe’ is made available to the community in this paper and in a dedicated web page.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of cluster halos in the universe are expected to be roughly prolate.
“The majority of cluster halos in the universe are expected to be roughly prolate [94]; as such, we allow for a prolate, rather than oblate or fully triaxial ellipticity.”
From Constraint on dark matter self-interaction from combined strong lensing and stellar kinematics in MACS J0138-2155 (2026) · cites this paper as [94]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Carroll S. M., Press W. H., Turner E. L., 1992, ARA&A, 30, 499
- Klypin A., Yepes G., Gottlober S., Prada F., Hess S., 2014, preprint (arXiv:1411.4001) · arXiv
- Prada F., Klypin A. A., Cuesta A. J., Betancort-Rijo J. E., Primack J., 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3018 Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
O’Donnell, J. H., Jeltema, T. E., Roberts, M. G., Nightingale, J., Flowers, A., & Aldas, D. (2026) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/hfgd-245k · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bonamigo, M., Despali, G., Limousin, M., Angulo, R., Giocoli, C., & Soucail, G.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Osservatorio astronomico di Bologna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bonamigo, Mario
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-04-08
- Volume
- 449
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3171-3182
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2005630392
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0001, ANR11IDEX000102, ANR-11-IDEX, IDEX-0001-02, ANR-11-LABX-0060)
- Università degli Studi di Padova
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02)
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (259349)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- dark matter halos, halo shape, stress triaxiality, galaxy clusters, halo mass dependence, cosmological N-body simulations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review