Cited by 970Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

MultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles

Open access
Klypin, Anatoly, Yepes, Gustavo, Gottlöber, Stefan, Prada, Francisco, Heß, Steffen·2016·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Predicting structural properties of dark matter haloes is one of the fundamental goals of modern cosmology. We use the suite of MultiDark cosmological simulations to study the evolution of dark matter halo density profiles, concentrations, and velocity anisotropies. We find that in order to understand the structure of dark matter haloes and to make 1–2 per cent accurate predictions for density profiles, one needs to realize that halo concentration is more complex than the ratio of the virial radius to the core radius in the Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW) profile. For massive haloes, the average density profile is far from the NFW shape and the concentration is defined by both the core radius and the shape parameter α in the Einasto approximation. We show that haloes progress through three stages of evolution. They start as rare density peaks and experience fast and nearly radial infall that brings mass closer to the centre, producing a highly concentrated halo. Here, the halo concentration increases with increasing halo mass and the concentration is defined by the α parameter with a nearly constant core radius. Later haloes slide into the plateau regime where the accretion becomes less radial, but frequent mergers still affect even the central region. At this stage, the concentration does not depend on halo mass. Once the rate of accretion and merging slows down, haloes move into the domain of declining concentration–mass relation because new accretion piles up mass close to the virial radius while the core radius is staying constant. Accurate analytical fits are provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stw248

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The high concentration inferred by such studies is in tension with theoretical expectations from cosmological simulations, which predict a mean concentration of ∼9 and a 68 percentile range of ∼[7,12].

    “that is in tension with theoretical expectations based on cosmological simulations, which predict a mean concentration of ∼ 9 and a 68 percentile range of ∼ [7 , 12]”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Klypin et al. 2016

    Section 6 (p. 11) says simulated halo concentration depends on mass, redshift, and halo selection; Appendix A (p. 18) gives a z = 0 concentration parameter of 9.75 for one selection, broadly consistent with ∼9. The passages do not give a 68-percentile concentration range of [7,12] or assess tension with the citing document’s inferred high concentration. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 970

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Alimi J.-M. et al., 2012, ArXiv e-prints 1206.2838 · arXiv
  2. Diemer B., Kravtsov A. V., 2014a, ArXiv e-prints
  3. Diemer B., Kravtsov A. V., 2014b, ArXiv e-prints
  4. Gottloeber S., Klypin A., 2008, ArXiv e-prints
  5. Klypin A., Holtzman J., 1997, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
  6. Meneghetti M., Rasia E., 2013, ArXiv e-prints
  7. Watson W. A., Iliev I. T., Diego J. M., Gottl¨ ober S., Knebe A., Mart´ ınez-Gonz´ alez E., Yepes G., 2013, ArXiv e-prints Wechsler R. H., Bullock J. S., Primack J. R., Kravtsov A. V., Dekel A., 2002, ApJ, 568, 52

Authors
Klypin, A., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., Prada, F., & Heß, S.
Affiliations
  • New Mexico State University (US)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
  • Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (DE)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2016-02-05
Volume
457
Issue
4
Pages
4340-4359
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1520258040
Cited by
970
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 4
FWCI
47.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
dark matter halos, halo concentration, halo density profiles, Einasto profile, Navarro-Frenk-White profile, velocity anisotropy, halo evolution, halo mergers, accretion, concentration-mass relation, core radius

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review