Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The dragon simulations: globular cluster evolution with a million stars

Open access
Wang, Long, Spurzem, Rainer, Aarseth, Sverre, Giersz, Mirek, Askar, Abbas, Berczik, Peter, Naab, Thorsten, Schadow, Riko, Kouwenhoven, M. B. N.·2016·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Introducing the dragon simulation project, we present direct N-body simulations of four massive globular clusters (GCs) with 106 stars and 5 per cent primordial binaries at a high level of accuracy and realism. The GC evolution is computed with nbody6++gpu and follows the dynamical and stellar evolution of individual stars and binaries, kicks of neutron stars and black holes (BHs), and the effect of a tidal field. We investigate the evolution of the luminous (stellar) and dark (faint stars and stellar remnants) GC components and create mock observations of the simulations (i.e. photometry, colour–magnitude diagrams, surface brightness and velocity dispersion profiles). By connecting internal processes to observable features, we highlight the formation of a long-lived ‘dark’ nuclear subsystem made of BHs, which results in a two-component structure. The inner core is dominated by the BH subsystem and experiences a core-collapse phase within the first Gyr. It can be detected in the stellar (luminous) line-of-sight velocity dispersion profiles. The outer extended core – commonly observed in the (luminous) surface brightness profiles – shows no collapse features and is continuously expanding. We demonstrate how a King model fit to observed clusters might help identify the presence of post core-collapse BH subsystems. For global observables like core and half-mass radii, the direct simulations agree well with Monte Carlo models. Variations in the initial mass function can result in significantly different GC properties (e.g. density distributions) driven by varying amounts of early mass-loss and the number of forming BHs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stw274

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Spurzem, R., Aarseth, S., Giersz, M., Askar, A., Berczik, P., Naab, T., Schadow, R., & Kouwenhoven, M. B. N.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2016-02-08
Volume
458
Issue
2
Pages
1450-1465
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2270122817
Cited by
257
References
70
FWCI
15.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dragon simulations: globular cluster evolution with a million stars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stw274
The paper
Wang, L., Spurzem, R., Aarseth, S., Giersz, M., Askar, A., Berczik, P., Naab, T., Schadow, R., & Kouwenhoven, M. B. N. (2016). The dragon simulations: globular cluster evolution with a million stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw274

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.