The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys
Open accessAbstract
We explore strategies to extract cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, galaxy clustering, cluster number counts and cluster weak lensing. We utilize the cosmolike software to simulate results from a Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) like data set, specifically, we (1) compare individual and joint analyses of the different probes, (2) vary the selection criteria for lens and source galaxies, (3) investigate the impact of blending, (4) investigate the impact of the assumed cosmological model in multiprobe covariances, (6) quantify information content as a function of scales and (7) explore the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignment in a multiprobe context. Our analyses account for all cross-correlations within and across probes and include the higher-order (non-Gaussian) terms in the multiprobe covariance matrix. We simultaneously model cosmological parameters and a variety of systematics, e.g. uncertainties arising from shear and photo-z calibration, cluster mass-observable relation, galaxy intrinsic alignment and galaxy bias (up to 54 parameters altogether). We highlight two results: first, increasing the number density of source galaxies by ∼30 per cent, which corresponds to solving blending for LSST, only gains little information. Secondly, including small scales in clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing, by utilizing halo occupation distribution models, can substantially boost cosmological constraining power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Extracting Primordial Non-Gaussianity without Cosmic Variance
Seljak, U. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.021302 · Cited by 354
The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project
Chang, C., Jarvis, M., Jain, B., Kahn, S. M., Kirkby, D., Connolly, A., Krughoff, S., Peng, E. H., & Peterson, J. R. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1156 · Cited by 164
Zhan, H., Knox, L., & Tyson, J. A. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/690/1/923 · Cited by 67
Cited by
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
Self-citationDark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationDark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023520 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationDark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration
Amon, A., Gruen, D., Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Dodelson, S., Choi, A., Doux, C., Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023514 · Cited by 437
Self-citationAbbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E., et al. (2023) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.083504 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Krause, E., & Eifler, T.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-05-23
- Volume
- 470
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2100-2112
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2341729741
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stx1261
- The paper
- Krause, E., & Eifler, T. (2017). cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.