Cited by 114Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

An overabundance of black hole X-ray binaries in the Galactic Centre from tidal captures

Open access
Generozov, A, Stone, N C, Metzger, B D, Ostriker, J P·2018·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

A large population of X-ray binaries (XRBs) was recently discovered within the central parsec of the Galaxy by Hailey et al. While the presence of compact objects on this scale due to radial mass segregation is, in itself, unsurprising, the fraction of binaries would naively be expected to be small because of how easily primordial binaries are dissociated in the dynamically hot environment of the nuclear star cluster (NSC). We propose that the formation of XRBs in the central parsec is dominated by the tidal capture of stars by black holes (BHs) and neutron stars (NSs). We model the time-dependent radial density profiles of stars and compact objects in the NSC with a Fokker–Planck approach, using the present-day stellar population and rate of in situ massive star (and thus compact object) formation as observational constraints. Of the ∼1–4 × 104 BHs that accumulate in the central parsec over the age of the Galaxy, we predict that ∼60–200 currently exist as BH-XRBs formed from tidal capture, consistent with the population seen by Hailey et al. A somewhat lower number of tidal capture NS-XRBs is also predicted. We also use our observationally calibrated models for the NSC to predict rates of other exotic dynamical processes, such as the tidal disruption of stars by the central supermassive BH (∼10−4 per year at z = 0).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty1262

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Generozov, A., Stone, N. C., Metzger, B. D., & Ostriker, J. P.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Generozov, A
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
478
Issue
3
Pages
4030-4051
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2796292935
Cited by
114
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (PF5-160145, NNX16AB30G, NNX17AK43G)
  • National Sleep Foundation (AST-1410950, AST-1615084)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
black hole X-ray binaries, Galactic Center, tidal capture, nuclear star clusters, supermassive black holes, neutron stars, compact binaries, Fokker-Planck model, tidal disruption, stellar density profiles, mass segregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review