Cited by 29Adaptive optics and wavefront sensingAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Wavelength-dependent PSFs and their impact on weak lensing measurements

Open access
Carlsten, S G, Strauss, Michael A, Lupton, Robert H, Meyers, Joshua E, Miyazaki, Satoshi·2018·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We measure and model the wavelength dependence of the point spread function (PSF) in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program survey. We find that PSF chromaticity is present in the redder stars that appear smaller than bluer stars in the g, r, and i bands at the 1–2 per cent level and in the |$z$| and y bands at the 0.1–0.2 per cent level. From the color dependence of the PSF, we fit a model between the monochromatic PSF size based on weighted second moments, R, and wavelength of the form R(λ) ∝ λ−b. We find values of b between 0.2 and 0.5, depending on the epoch and filter. This is consistent with the expectations of a turbulent atmosphere with an outer scale length of ∼10 − 100 m, indicating that the atmosphere is dominating the chromaticity. In the best seeing data, we find that the optical system and detector also contribute some wavelength dependence. Meyers & Burchat showed that b must be measured to an accuracy of ∼0.02 not to dominate the systematic error budget of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) weak lensing (WL) survey. Using simple image simulations, we find that b can be inferred with this accuracy in the r and i-bands for all positions in the LSST focal plane, assuming a stellar density of 1 star arcmin−2and that the optical component of the PSF can be accurately modeled. Therefore, it is possible to correct for most, if not all, of the bias that the wavelength-dependent PSF will introduce into an LSST-like WL survey.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty1636

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of atmospheric dispersion on weak lensing studies are mitigated by modeling the point-spread function as a function of the color of the object.

    “The effects of atmospheric dispersion on WL studies are mitigated by modeling the PSF as a function of the color of the object ( for more details, see Meyers & Burchat 2015; Carlsten et al. 2018 ) .”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Carlsten et al. 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Coulton W. R., Armstrong R., Smith K. M., Lupton R. H., Spergel D. N., 2017, preprint, (arXiv:1711.06273) · arXiv
  2. Eriksen M., Hoekstra H., 2017, preprint, (arXiv:1707.04334) · arXiv
  3. Hufnagel R. E., Stanley N. R., 1964, Journal of the Optical Soci- ety of America (1917-1983), 54, 52
  4. Lupton R., Gunn J. E., Ivezić Z., Knapp G. R., Kent S., 2001, in Harnden Jr. F. R., Primini F. A., Payne H. E., eds, As- tronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 238, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X. p. 269 (arXiv:astro-ph/0101420) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlsten, S. G., Strauss, M. A., Lupton, R. H., Meyers, J. E., & Miyazaki, S.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Department of Astrophysical Sciences, 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
  • The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP)
Corresponding author
Carlsten, S G
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-06-21
Volume
479
Issue
2
Pages
1491-1504
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2797116600
Cited by
29
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1238877)
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX08AR22G, AST-1238877)
  • Princeton University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NNX08AR22G)
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Durham University
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Academia Sinica
  • Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
  • Queen's University
  • National Central University
  • National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
  • High Energy Accelerator Research Organization
  • Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Toray Science Foundation
  • Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
  • Science Mission Directorate (NNX08AR22G)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H05892)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
  • Planetary Science Division (NNX08AR22G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
point spread function, wavelength dependence, weak gravitational lensing, Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program, LSST, seeing, PSF correction, systematic errors, image simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review