Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The SPHINX Cosmological Simulations of the First Billion Years: the Impact of Binary Stars on Reionization★

Open access
Rosdahl, Joakim, Katz, Harley, Blaizot, Jérémy, Kimm, Taysun, Michel-Dansac, Léo, Garel, Thibault, Haehnelt, Martin, Ocvirk, Pierre, Teyssier, Romain·2018·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present the SPHINX suite of cosmological adaptive mesh refinement simulations, the first radiation-hydrodynamical simulations to simultaneously capture large-scale reionization and the escape of ionizing radiation from thousands of resolved galaxies.Our 5 and 10 co-moving Mpc volumes resolve haloes down to the atomic cooling limit and model the interstellar medium with better than ≈10 pc resolution.The project has numerous goals in improving our understanding of reionization and making predictions for future observations.In this first paper, we study how the inclusion of binary stars in computing stellar luminosities impacts reionization, compared to a model that includes only single stars.Owing to the suppression of galaxy growth via strong feedback, our galaxies are in good agreement with observational estimates of the galaxy luminosity function.We find that binaries have a significant impact on the timing of reionization: with binaries, our boxes are 99.9 percent ionized by volume at z ≈ 7, while without them our volumes fail to reionize by z = 6.These results are robust to changes in volume size, resolution, and feedback efficiency.The escape of ionizing radiation from individual galaxies varies strongly and frequently.On average, binaries lead to escape fractions of ≈7-10 percent, about three times higher than with single stars only.The higher escape fraction is a result of a shallower decline in ionizing luminosity with age, and is the primary reason for earlier reionization, although the higher integrated luminosity with binaries also plays a subdominant role.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty1655

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Rosdahl, J., Katz, H., Blaizot, J., Kimm, T., Michel-Dansac, L., Garel, T., Haehnelt, M., Ocvirk, P., & Teyssier, R.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-06-23
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2784796110
Cited by
277
References
1
FWCI
16.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.