Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interrelated main-sequence mass–luminosity, mass–radius, and mass–effective temperature relations

Open access
Eker, Z, Bakış, V, Bilir, S, Soydugan, F, Steer, I, Soydugan, E, Bakış, H, Aliçavuş, F, Aslan, G, Alpsoy, M·2018·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Absolute parameters of 509 main-sequence stars selected from the components of detached-eclipsing spectroscopic binaries in the Solar neighbourhood are used to study mass-luminosity, mass-radius and mass-effective temperature relations (MLR, MRR and MTR). The MLR function is found better if expressed by a six-piece classical MLR ($L \propto M^α$) rather than a fifth or a sixth degree polynomial within the mass range of $0.179\leq M/M_{\odot}\leq 31$. The break points separating the mass-ranges with classical MLR do not appear to us to be arbitrary. Instead, the data indicate abrupt changes along the mass axis in the mean energy generation per unit of stellar mass. Unlike the MLR function, the MRR and MTR functions cannot be determined over the full range of masses. A single piece MRR function is calibrated from the radii of stars with $M\leq1.5M_{\odot}$, while a second single piece MTR function is found for stars with $M>1.5M_{\odot}$. The missing part of the MRR is computed from the MLR and MTR, while the missing part of the MTR is computed from the MLR and MRR. As a result, we have interrelated MLR, MRR and MTR, which are useful in determining the typical absolute physical parameters of main-sequence stars of given masses. These functions are also useful to estimate typical absolute physical parameters from typical $T_{eff}$ values. Thus, we were able to estimate the typical absolute physical parameters of main-sequence stars observed in the Sejong Open Cluster survey, based on that survey's published values for $T_{eff}$. Since typical absolute physical parameters of main sequence stars cannot normally be determined in such photometric surveys, the interrelated functions are shown to be useful to compute such missing parameters from similar surveys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty1834

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Eker, Z., Bakış, V, Bilir, S., Soydugan, F., Steer, I., Soydugan, E., Bakış, H., Aliçavuş, F., Aslan, G., & Alpsoy, M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-07-19
Volume
479
Issue
4
Pages
5491-5511
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2851129314
Cited by
258
References
54
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interrelated main-sequence mass–luminosity, mass–radius, and mass–effective temperature relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sty1834
The paper
Eker, Z., Bakış, V, Bilir, S., Soydugan, F., Steer, I., Soydugan, E., Bakış, H., Aliçavuş, F., Aslan, G., & Alpsoy, M. (2018). Interrelated main-sequence mass–luminosity, mass–radius, and mass–effective temperature relations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1834

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.