The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data
Open accessAbstract
We combine Dark Energy Survey Year 1 clustering and weak lensing data with baryon acoustic oscillations and Big Bang nucleosynthesis experiments to constrain the Hubble constant. Assuming a flat ΛCDM model with minimal neutrino mass (∑mν = 0.06 eV), we find |$H_0=67.4^{+1.1}_{-1.2}\ \rm {km\,\rm s^{-1}\,\rm Mpc^{-1}}$| (68 per cent CL). This result is completely independent of Hubble constant measurements based on the distance ladder, cosmic microwave background anisotropies (both temperature and polarization), and strong lensing constraints. There are now five data sets that: (a) have no shared observational systematics; and (b) each constrains the Hubble constant with fractional uncertainty at the few-per cent level. We compare these five independent estimates, and find that, as a set, the differences between them are significant at the 2.5σ level (χ2/dof = 24/11, probability to exceed = 1.1 per cent). Having set the threshold for consistency at 3σ, we combine all five data sets to arrive at |$H_0=69.3^{+0.4}_{-0.6}\ \rm {km\,\mathrm{ s}^{-1}\,\mathrm{ Mpc}^{-1}}$|.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements
Troxel, M. A., Krause, E., Chang, C., Eifler, T. F., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., MacCrann, N., Chen, A., Davis, C. P., DeRose, J., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1889 · Cited by 96
Self-citationRetractedThe cosmological constant problem
Weinberg, S. (1989) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.1 · Cited by 7,341 · cited 1×
“While the cosmological constant is usually viewed as the most conservative solution to this theoretical challenge, its interpretation as a manifestation of vacuum energy leads to naive predictions that differ from the observed value by many orders of magnitude (Weinberg 1989).”
BackgroundGaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., Evans, D. W., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 · Cited by 6,946
Self-citationOlive, K. A. (2014) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001 · Cited by 6,897
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495 · cited 2×
“…12, 45 Zuntz J. et al., 2017, preprint (arXiv:1708.01533) APPENDI X A : IMPORTANCE SAMPLI NG W I T H N U I S A N C E PA R A M E T E R S The SPTpol likelihood was written as a CosmoMC (Lewis & Bridle 2002) module, whereas the DES likelihood was written as a CosmoSIS (Zuntz et al. 2015) module.”
MethodInfluentialFields, B. D., Molaro, P. P., & Sarkar, S. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.1408 · Cited by 3,458
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Self-citationBeutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x · Cited by 2,590 · cited 3×
“…as Type Ia supernovae (SNe) (e.g. Betoule et al. 2014); galaxy–galaxy (gg) clustering in the late-time Universe (e.g. Gaztañaga, Cabré & Hui 2009; Beutler et al. 2011; Ross et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2017); the time delays of multiply imaged quasars (e.g. Bonvin et al. 2017); and weak…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA 2.4% DETERMINATION OF THE LOCAL VALUE OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT*
Riess, A. G., Macri, L. M., Hoffmann, S. L., Scolnic, D., Casertano, S., Filippenko, A. V., Tucker, B. E., Reid, M. J., Jones, D. O., Silverman, J. M., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/56 · Cited by 2,242
Self-citationImproved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples
Betoule, M., Kessler, R., Guy, J., Mosher, J., Hardin, D., Biswas, R., Astier, P., El-Hage, P., Konig, M., Kuhlmann, S., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423413 · Cited by 1,905
Self-citation
Cited by
Dark Matter as a Topological Vacuum Condensate
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,403
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts
Ade, P., Aguirre, J., Ahmed, Z., Aiola, S., Ali, A., Alonso, D., Alvarez, M. A., Arnold, K., Ashton, P., Austermann, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056 · Cited by 1,519
Self-citationTensions between the early and late Universe
Verde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 · Cited by 1,380
Planck 2018 results: VIII. Gravitational lensing
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833886 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Annis, J., Bechtol, K., Blazek, J., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, R. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carnero Rosell, A., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Chang, C. L., Crawford, T. M., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Evrard, A. E., Fernandez, E., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Henning, J. W., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeltema, T., Johnson, M. D., Johnson, M. W. G., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuhlmann, S., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Liddle, A. R., Lima, M., Lin, H., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A. G., Manzotti, A., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Natoli, T., Nugent, P., Ogando, R. L. C., Park, Y., Plazas, A. A., Reichardt, C. L., Reil, K., Roodman, A., Ross, A. J., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V, Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Smith, M., Smith, R. C., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Troxel, M. A., Walker, A. R., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Wester, W., Wu, W. L. K., Zuntz, J., & Collaborations), T. D. E. S. A. T. S. P. T.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-07-20
- Volume
- 480
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3879-3888
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2765730705
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 22.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sty1939
- The paper
- Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Annis, J., Bechtol, K., Blazek, J., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, R. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carnero Rosell, A., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Chang, C. L., Crawford, T. M., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., . . . Collaborations), T. D. E. S. A. T. S. P. T. (2018). Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
