Isochrone ages for ∼3 million stars with the second Gaia data release
Open accessAbstract
We present a catalogue of distances, masses, and ages for ∼3 million stars in the second Gaia data release with spectroscopic parameters available from the large spectroscopic surveys: APOGEE, Gaia-ESO, GALAH, LAMOST, RAVE, and SEGUE. We use a Bayesian framework to characterize the probability density functions of distance, mass, and age using photometric, spectroscopic, and astrometric information, supplemented with spectroscopic masses where available for giant stars. Furthermore, we provide posterior extinction estimates (AV) to every star using published extinction maps as a prior input. We provide an appendix with extinction coefficients for Gaia photometry derived from stellar models, which account for variation with intrinsic colour and total extinction. Our pipeline provides output estimates of the spectroscopic parameters, which can be used to inform improved spectroscopic analysis. We complement our catalogues with Galactocentric coordinates and actions with associated uncertainties. As a demonstration of the power of our catalogue, we produce velocity dispersion profiles of the disc separated by age and Galactocentric radius (between 3 and |$15\, \mathrm{kpc}$| from the Galactic centre). This suggests that the velocity dispersion profiles flatten with radius in the outer Galaxy (|$\gt\!8\, \mathrm{kpc}$|) and that at all radii the velocity dispersion follows the smooth power law with age observed in the solar neighbourhood.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE)
Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., Prieto, C. A., Barkhouser, R., Bizyaev, D., Blank, B., Brunner, S., Burton, A., Carrera, R., et al. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa784d · Cited by 1,831 · see citing works
Estimating Distance from Parallaxes. IV. Distances to 1.33 Billion Stars in Gaia Data Release 2
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Mantelet, G., & Andrae, R. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
SEGUE: A SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY OF 240,000 STARS WITH <i>g</i> = 14-20
Yanny, B., Rockosi, C., Newberg, H. J., Knapp, G. R., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Alcorn, B., Allam, S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., et al. (2009) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4377 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
A review of action estimation methods for galactic dynamics
Sanders, J. L., & Binney, J. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw106 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Anguiano B., et al., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1807.07625 ) · arXiv
- Casey A. R., Hogg D. W., Ness M., Rix H.-W., Ho A. Q., Gilmore G., 2016, preprint, ( arXiv:1603.03040 ) · arXiv
- Castelli F., Kurucz R. L., 2004, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, Charbonnel C., 1994, A&A, 282, 811
- MNRAS, 444, 2525 Chen Y., Bressan A., Girardi L., Marigo P., Kong X., Lanza A., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1068 Cirasuolo M., et al., 2012, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV. p. 84460S ( arXiv:1208.5780 ), doi:10.1117/12.925871 Coronado J., Rix H.-W., Trick W. H., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1804.07760 ) Cropper M., et al., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1804.09369 ) Cui X.-Q., et al., 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197 Dalton G. B., et al., 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. p. 62690X, doi:10.1117/12.670018 Dalton G., et al., 2012, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV. p. 84460P, doi:10.1117/12.925950 Das P., Sanders J., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1804.09596 ) De Silva G. M., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2604 Deng L.-C., et al., 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 735 Drimmel R., Cabrera-Lavers A., López-Corredoira M., 2003, A&A, 409, 205 Emerson J., McPherson A., Sutherland W., 2006, The Messenger, 126, 41 Evans D. W., et al., 2018, A&A, 616, A4 Fitzpatrick E. L., 1999, PASP, 111, 63 Freeman K., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2002, ARA&A, 40, 487 Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, A&A, 595, A1 Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018a, A&A, 616, A1 Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018b, A&A, 616, A10 Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018c, A&A, 616, A11 Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018d, A&A, 616, A12 García Pérez A. E., et al., 2016, AJ, 151, 144 Gilmore G., et al., 2012, The Messenger, 147, 25 Green G. M., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 651 Gunn J. E., et al., 2006, AJ, 131, 2332 Ho A. Y. Q., et al., 2017, ApJ, 836, 5 Hoffman M. D., Gelman A., 2011, preprint, ( arXiv:1111.4246 ) Holmberg J., Nordström B., Andersen J., 2009, A&A, 501, 941 Howes L. M., Lindegren L., Feltzing S., Church R. P., Bensby T., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1804.08321 ) Hunter J. D., 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90 Jones E., Oliphant T., Peterson P., et al., 2001, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, http://www.scipy.org/ Jørgensen B. R., Lindegren L., 2005, A&A, 436, 127 Kollmeier J. A., et al., 2017, preprint, ( arXiv:1711.03234 ) Kordopatis G., et al., 2013, AJ, 146, 134 Kroupa P., Tout C. A., Gilmore G., 1993, MNRAS, 262, 545 Kunder A., et al., 2017, AJ, 153, 75 Lee Y. S., et al., 2008a, AJ, 136, 2022 Lee Y. S., et al., 2008b, AJ, 136, 2050 Lindegren L., et al., 2018, A&A, 616, A2 Luri X., et al., 2018, A&A, 616, A9 Mackereth J. T., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3057 Magnier E. A., et al., 2013, ApJS, 205, 20 Maíz Apellániz J., 2006, AJ, 131, 1184 Majewski S. R., et al., 2017, AJ, 154, 94 Marín-Franch A., et al., 2009, ApJ, 694, 1498 Marshall D. J., Robin A. C., Reylé C., Schultheis M., Picaud S., 2006, A&A, 453, 635 Martell S. L., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3203 Martig M., Minchev I., Flynn C., 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2452 Martig M., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3655 Masseron T., Gilmore G., 2015, MNRAS, 453, 1855 McKinney W., 2010, in van der Walt S., Millman J., eds, Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. pp 51 - 56 McMillan P. J., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5279 Minchev I., Martig M., Streich D., Scannapieco C., de Jong R. S., Steinmetz M., 2015, ApJ, 804, L9 · DOI
- Mints A., Hekker S., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1804.06578 ) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way
Helmi, A. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021917 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Uncovering the birth of the Milky Way through accurate stellar ages with Gaia
Gallart, C., Bernard, E. J., Brook, C. B., Ruiz-Lara, T., Cassisi, S., Hill, V., & Monelli, M. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0829-5 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sanders, J. L., & Das, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sanders, Jason L
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-09-14
- Volume
- 481
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 4093-4110
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2890196524
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/N000919/1)
- Simons Foundation
- European Space Agency
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Australian Astronomical Observatory
- Leibniz-Institut fuer Astrophysik Potsdam
- Australian National University
- Australian Research Council
- French National Research Agency
- German Research Foundation
- European Research Council (ERC-StG 240271)
- Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica at Padova
- Johns Hopkins University
- National Science Foundation (AST-0908326)
- W. M. Keck foundation
- Macquarie University
- Netherlands Research School for Astronomy
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Swiss National Science Foundation
- Universities of Groningen, Heidelberg and Sydney
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- isochron ages, stellar ages, stellar distances, stellar mass, Gaia DR2, Bayesian parameter estimation, extinction, Galactic disc, velocity dispersion profiles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review