The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling long-period variables – I. A new grid of O-rich and C-rich pulsation models
Open accessAbstract
We present a new grid of non-adiabatic, linear pulsation models of long-period variables (LPVs), including periods and growth rates for radial modes from the fundamental to the fourth overtone. The models span a wide range in mass, luminosity, metallicity, C/O ratio, and helium abundance, effectively covering the whole thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) evolution, and representing a significant update with respect to previous works. The main improvement is the inclusion of detailed atomic and molecular opacities, consistent with the models chemical mixture, that makes the present set of models the first to systematically account for variability in C-stars. We examine periods and growth rates in the models, and find that, while the fundamental mode is affected by the structure of the envelope, overtones are less sensitive to the interior and largely determined by the global properties. In the models, the frequency of the overtone with the largest degree of excitation is found to scale with the acoustic cut-off frequency at the stellar surface, a behaviour similar to that observed for the frequency of maximum oscillation power for solar-like oscillations in less evolved red giants. This allows us to provide a simple analytic prescription to predict the most-likely dominant mode as a function of stellar parameters. Best-fitting relations for periods are also provided. By applying results of pulsation models to evolutionary tracks, we present a general picture of the evolution of long-period variability during the TP-AGB, that we find consistent with observations. Models are made public through a dedicated web interface.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This failure is mainly because of the unreliability of the age-period relation for Mira variables at such a young age.
“This is mainly because of the unreliability of the age-period relation for Mira variables at such a young age (Trabucchi et al. 2019; Sanders et al. 2023).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Trabucchi et al. 2019
Citations
Cites
Kepler planet-detection mission: Introduction and first results
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T., Caldwell, D., Caldwell, J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185402 · Cited by 4,035
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- Arnett, 1969, Ap&SS, 5, 180, 10.1007/BF00650291 · DOI
- Baglin, 2009, IAU Symp. Vol. 253, Transiting Planets, 71
- Belkacem, 2011, A&A, 530, A142, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116490 · DOI
- Borucki, 2009, IAU Symposium Vol. 253, Transiting Planets, 289
- Brown, 1991, ApJ, 368, 599, 10.1086/169725 · DOI
- Caffau, 2011, Sol. Phys., 268, 255, 10.1007/s11207-010-9541-4 · DOI
- Chaplin, 2013, ARA&A, 51, 353, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140938 · DOI
- Christensen-Dalsgaard, 2001, ApJ, 562, L141, 10.1086/338194 · DOI
- Cox, 1980, Theory of Stellar Pulsation, 10.1515/9781400885855 · DOI
- Cox, 1968, Principles of Stellar Structure
- Dziembowski, 2001, MNRAS, 328, 601, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04894.x · DOI
- Fox, 1982, ApJ, 259, 198, 10.1086/160160 · DOI
- Freytag, 2017, A&A, 600, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629594 · DOI
- Höfner, 2018, A&AR, 26, 1, 10.1007/s00159-017-0106-5 · DOI
- Huang, 2018, ApJ, 857, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6b3 · DOI
- Ireland, 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1994, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14037.x · DOI
- Ita, 2002, MNRAS, 337, L31, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.06109.x · DOI
- Ita, 2004, MNRAS, 347, 720, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07257.x · DOI
- Keller, 2006, ApJ, 642, 834, 10.1086/501115 · DOI
- Kiss, 2003, MNRAS, 343, L79, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06931.x · DOI
- Kjeldsen, 1995, A&A, 293, 87
- Lattanzio, 2003, Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, 23
- Lebzelter, 2007, A&A, 475, 643, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078395 · DOI
- Lebzelter, 2016, A&A, 585, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527315 · DOI
- Marigo, 2009, A&A, 508, 1539, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912598 · DOI
- Marigo, 2013, MNRAS, 434, 488, 10.1093/mnras/stt1034 · DOI
- Marigo, 2017, ApJ, 835, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/77 · DOI
- Menzies, 2015, MNRAS, 452, 910, 10.1093/mnras/stv1310 · DOI
- Mosser, 2010, A&A, 517, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014036 · DOI
- Mosser, 2013, A&A, 559, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322243 · DOI
- Ostlie, 1986, ApJ, 311, 864, 10.1086/164824 · DOI
- Percy, 2001, PASP, 113, 983, 10.1086/322153 · DOI
- Seaton, 2005, MNRAS, 362, L1, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00019.x · DOI
- Skrutskie, 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708 · DOI · Paper page
- Soszyński, 2004, Acta Astron., 54, 129
- Soszyński, 2009, Acta Astron., 59, 239
- Trabucchi, 2017, ApJ, 847, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8998 · DOI
- Ulrich, 1986, ApJ, 306, L37, 10.1086/184700 · DOI
- Viani, 2017, ApJ, 843, 11, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa729c · DOI
- Whitelock, 2014, EAS Publ. Ser. Vol. 67/68, The Milky Way Unravelled by Gaia: GREAT Science from the Gaia Data Releases, 263
- Whitelock, 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2216, 10.1093/mnras/sts188 · DOI
- Wood, 1990, From Miras to Planetary Nebulae: Which Path for Stellar Evolution?, 67
- Wood, 2000, PASA, 17, 18, 10.1071/AS00018 · DOI
- Wood, 2015, MNRAS, 448, 3829, 10.1093/mnras/stv289 · DOI
- Wood, 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2576, 10.1093/mnras/stu460 · DOI
- Wood, 1983, ApJ, 272, 99, 10.1086/161265 · DOI
- Wood, 1999, IAU Symp. Vol. 191, Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, 151
- Wray, 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1059, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07587.x · DOI
- Xiong, 2013, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 13, 1269, 10.1088/1674-4527/13/11/001 · DOI
- Xiong, 2007, MNRAS, 378, 1270, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11642.x · DOI
- Xiong, 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2698, 10.1093/mnras/sty2014 · DOI
- Yuan, 2017, AJ, 154, 149, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa86f1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Trabucchi, M., Wood, P. R., Montalbán, J., Marigo, P., Pastorelli, G., & Girardi, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Trabucchi, Michele
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-10-11
- Volume
- 482
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 929-949
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2897437789
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Research Council (615604)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- long-period variable stars, C-rich stars, O-rich stars, overtone modes, growth rate (instability), C/O ratio, helium abundance, molecular opacities, acoustic cutoff frequency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review