Cited by 61Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modelling long-period variables – I. A new grid of O-rich and C-rich pulsation models

Open access
Trabucchi, Michele, Wood, Peter R, Montalbán, Josefina, Marigo, Paola, Pastorelli, Giada, Girardi, Léo·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present a new grid of non-adiabatic, linear pulsation models of long-period variables (LPVs), including periods and growth rates for radial modes from the fundamental to the fourth overtone. The models span a wide range in mass, luminosity, metallicity, C/O ratio, and helium abundance, effectively covering the whole thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) evolution, and representing a significant update with respect to previous works. The main improvement is the inclusion of detailed atomic and molecular opacities, consistent with the models chemical mixture, that makes the present set of models the first to systematically account for variability in C-stars. We examine periods and growth rates in the models, and find that, while the fundamental mode is affected by the structure of the envelope, overtones are less sensitive to the interior and largely determined by the global properties. In the models, the frequency of the overtone with the largest degree of excitation is found to scale with the acoustic cut-off frequency at the stellar surface, a behaviour similar to that observed for the frequency of maximum oscillation power for solar-like oscillations in less evolved red giants. This allows us to provide a simple analytic prescription to predict the most-likely dominant mode as a function of stellar parameters. Best-fitting relations for periods are also provided. By applying results of pulsation models to evolutionary tracks, we present a general picture of the evolution of long-period variability during the TP-AGB, that we find consistent with observations. Models are made public through a dedicated web interface.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty2745

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This failure is mainly because of the unreliability of the age-period relation for Mira variables at such a young age.

    “This is mainly because of the unreliability of the age-period relation for Mira variables at such a young age (Trabucchi et al. 2019; Sanders et al. 2023).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Trabucchi et al. 2019

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Arnett, 1969, Ap&SS, 5, 180, 10.1007/BF00650291 · DOI
  2. Baglin, 2009, IAU Symp. Vol. 253, Transiting Planets, 71
  3. Belkacem, 2011, A&A, 530, A142, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116490 · DOI
  4. Borucki, 2009, IAU Symposium Vol. 253, Transiting Planets, 289
  5. Brown, 1991, ApJ, 368, 599, 10.1086/169725 · DOI
  6. Caffau, 2011, Sol. Phys., 268, 255, 10.1007/s11207-010-9541-4 · DOI
  7. Chaplin, 2013, ARA&A, 51, 353, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140938 · DOI
  8. Christensen-Dalsgaard, 2001, ApJ, 562, L141, 10.1086/338194 · DOI
  9. Cox, 1980, Theory of Stellar Pulsation, 10.1515/9781400885855 · DOI
  10. Cox, 1968, Principles of Stellar Structure
  11. Dziembowski, 2001, MNRAS, 328, 601, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04894.x · DOI
  12. Fox, 1982, ApJ, 259, 198, 10.1086/160160 · DOI
  13. Freytag, 2017, A&A, 600, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629594 · DOI
  14. Höfner, 2018, A&AR, 26, 1, 10.1007/s00159-017-0106-5 · DOI
  15. Huang, 2018, ApJ, 857, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6b3 · DOI
  16. Ireland, 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1994, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14037.x · DOI
  17. Ita, 2002, MNRAS, 337, L31, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.06109.x · DOI
  18. Ita, 2004, MNRAS, 347, 720, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07257.x · DOI
  19. Keller, 2006, ApJ, 642, 834, 10.1086/501115 · DOI
  20. Kiss, 2003, MNRAS, 343, L79, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06931.x · DOI
  21. Kjeldsen, 1995, A&A, 293, 87
  22. Lattanzio, 2003, Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, 23
  23. Lebzelter, 2007, A&A, 475, 643, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078395 · DOI
  24. Lebzelter, 2016, A&A, 585, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527315 · DOI
  25. Marigo, 2009, A&A, 508, 1539, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912598 · DOI
  26. Marigo, 2013, MNRAS, 434, 488, 10.1093/mnras/stt1034 · DOI
  27. Marigo, 2017, ApJ, 835, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/77 · DOI
  28. Menzies, 2015, MNRAS, 452, 910, 10.1093/mnras/stv1310 · DOI
  29. Mosser, 2010, A&A, 517, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014036 · DOI
  30. Mosser, 2013, A&A, 559, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322243 · DOI
  31. Ostlie, 1986, ApJ, 311, 864, 10.1086/164824 · DOI
  32. Percy, 2001, PASP, 113, 983, 10.1086/322153 · DOI
  33. Seaton, 2005, MNRAS, 362, L1, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00019.x · DOI
  34. Skrutskie, 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Soszyński, 2004, Acta Astron., 54, 129
  36. Soszyński, 2009, Acta Astron., 59, 239
  37. Trabucchi, 2017, ApJ, 847, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8998 · DOI
  38. Ulrich, 1986, ApJ, 306, L37, 10.1086/184700 · DOI
  39. Viani, 2017, ApJ, 843, 11, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa729c · DOI
  40. Whitelock, 2014, EAS Publ. Ser. Vol. 67/68, The Milky Way Unravelled by Gaia: GREAT Science from the Gaia Data Releases, 263
  41. Whitelock, 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2216, 10.1093/mnras/sts188 · DOI
  42. Wood, 1990, From Miras to Planetary Nebulae: Which Path for Stellar Evolution?, 67
  43. Wood, 2000, PASA, 17, 18, 10.1071/AS00018 · DOI
  44. Wood, 2015, MNRAS, 448, 3829, 10.1093/mnras/stv289 · DOI
  45. Wood, 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2576, 10.1093/mnras/stu460 · DOI
  46. Wood, 1983, ApJ, 272, 99, 10.1086/161265 · DOI
  47. Wood, 1999, IAU Symp. Vol. 191, Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, 151
  48. Wray, 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1059, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07587.x · DOI
  49. Xiong, 2013, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 13, 1269, 10.1088/1674-4527/13/11/001 · DOI
  50. Xiong, 2007, MNRAS, 378, 1270, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11642.x · DOI
  51. Xiong, 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2698, 10.1093/mnras/sty2014 · DOI
  52. Yuan, 2017, AJ, 154, 149, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa86f1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Trabucchi, M., Wood, P. R., Montalbán, J., Marigo, P., Pastorelli, G., & Girardi, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
Corresponding author
Trabucchi, Michele
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-10-11
Volume
482
Issue
1
Pages
929-949
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2897437789
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Research Council (615604)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
long-period variable stars, C-rich stars, O-rich stars, overtone modes, growth rate (instability), C/O ratio, helium abundance, molecular opacities, acoustic cutoff frequency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review