The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The optical morphologies of galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation: a comparison to Pan-STARRS observations
Open accessAbstract
We have generated synthetic images of ∼27 000 galaxies from the IllustrisTNG and the original Illustris hydrodynamic cosmological simulations, designed to match Pan-STARRS observations of log 10 (M * /M ) ≈ 9.8-11.3galaxies at z ≈ 0.05.Most of our synthetic images were created with the SKIRT radiative transfer code, including the effects of dust attenuation and scattering, and performing the radiative transfer directly on the Voronoi mesh used by the simulations themselves.We have analysed both our synthetic and real Pan-STARRS images with the newly developed statmorph code, which calculates non-parametric morphological diagnostics -including the Gini-M 20 and concentration-asymmetry-smoothness statisticsand performs 2D Sérsic fits.Overall, we find that the optical morphologies of IllustrisTNG galaxies are in good agreement with observations, and represent a substantial improvement compared to the original Illustris simulation.In particular, the locus of the Gini-M 20 diagram is consistent with that inferred from observations, while the median trends with stellar mass of all the morphological, size and shape parameters considered in this work lie within the ∼1σ scatter of the observational trends.However, the IllustrisTNG model has some difficulty with more stringent tests, such as producing a strong morphology-colour relation.This results in a somewhat higher fraction of red discs and blue spheroids compared to observations.Similarly, the morphology-size relation is problematic: while observations show that discs tend to be larger than spheroids at a fixed stellar mass, such a trend is not present in IllustrisTNG.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
Self-citationThe Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories
Conselice, C. J. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/375001 · Cited by 875
Colours and luminosities of z = 0.1 galaxies in the eagle simulation
Trayford, J. W., Theuns, T., Bower, R. G., Schaye, J., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Frenk, C. S., Crain, R. A., Vecchia, C. D., & McCarthy, I. G. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1461 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Torrey, P., Weinberger, R., Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Genel, S., van der Wel, A., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2338 · Cited by 916
Self-citationDeep learning predictions of galaxy merger stage and the importance of observational realism
Bottrell, C., Hani, M. H., Teimoorinia, H., Ellison, S. L., Moreno, J., Torrey, P., Hayward, C. C., Thorp, M., Simard, L., & Hernquist, L. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2934 · Cited by 113
Self-citationFerreira, L., Conselice, C. J., Duncan, K., Cheng, T.-Y., Griffiths, A., & Whitney, A. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8f9b · Cited by 92
Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Truong, N., Weinberger, R., Martin-Navarro, I., Springel, V., Faber, S. M., & Hernquist, L. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2779 · Cited by 87
Self-citationConvolutional neural network identification of galaxy post-mergers in UNIONS using IllustrisTNG
Bickley, R. W., Bottrell, C., Hani, M. H., Ellison, S. L., Teimoorinia, H., Yi, K. M., Wilkinson, S., Gwyn, S., & Hudson, M. J. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab806 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Snyder, G. F., Lotz, J. M., Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Genel, S., Weinberger, R., Tacchella, S., Pakmor, R., Torrey, P., Marinacci, F., Vogelsberger, M., Hernquist, L., & Thilker, D. A.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-12-10
- Volume
- 483
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 4140-4159
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2892039870
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The optical morphologies of galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation: a comparison to Pan-STARRS observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sty3345
- The paper
- Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Snyder, G. F., Lotz, J. M., Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Genel, S., Weinberger, R., Tacchella, S., Pakmor, R., Torrey, P., Marinacci, F., Vogelsberger, M., Hernquist, L., & Thilker, D. A. (2019). The optical morphologies of galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation: a comparison to Pan-STARRS observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.