The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering
Open accessAbstract
We present cosmological parameter constraints from a joint analysis of three cosmological probes: the tomographic cosmic shear signal in ∼450 deg2 of data from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS), the galaxy-matter cross-correlation signal of galaxies from the Galaxies And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey determined with KiDS weak lensing, and the angular correlation function of the same GAMA galaxies. We use fast power spectrum estimators that are based on simple integrals over the real-space correlation functions, and show that they are practically unbiased over relevant angular frequency ranges. We test our full pipeline on numerical simulations that are tailored to KiDS and retrieve the input cosmology. By fitting different combinations of power spectra, we demonstrate that the three probes are internally consistent. For all probes combined, we obtain |$S_8\equiv \sigma _8 \sqrt{\Omega _{\rm m}/0.3}=0.800_{-0.027}^{+0.029}$|, consistent with Planck and the fiducial KiDS-450 cosmic shear correlation function results. Marginalizing over wide priors on the mean of the tomographic redshift distributions yields consistent results for S8 with an increase of |$28\, {per \,cent}$| in the error. The combination of probes results in a 26 per cent reduction in uncertainties of S8 over using the cosmic shear power spectra alone. The main gain from these additional probes comes through their constraining power on nuisance parameters, such as the galaxy intrinsic alignment amplitude or potential shifts in the redshift distributions, which are up to a factor of 2 better constrained compared to using cosmic shear alone, demonstrating the value of large-scale structure probe combination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495 · cited 1×
“To constrain the cosmological parameters, we used COSMOMC8 (Lewis & Bridle 2002), which is a fast Markov Chain Monte Carlo code for cosmological parameter estimation.”
MethodBridle, S., & King, L. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444 · Cited by 492
Joudaki, S., Blake, C., Johnson, A., Amon, A., Asgari, M., Choi, A., Erben, T., Glazebrook, K., Harnois-Déraps, J., Heymans, C., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2820 · Cited by 291
Self-citation
Cited by
Dark Matter as a Topological Vacuum Condensate
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,403
Planck 2018 results: I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 · Cited by 1,635
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023520 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationHeymans, C., Tröster, T., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Hildebrandt, H., Joachimi, B., Kuijken, K., Lin, C.-A., Sánchez, A. G., van den Busch, J. L., et al. (2021) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039063 · Cited by 772
Self-citationDark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Zuntz, J., Eifler, T. F., Krause, E., Dodelson, S., Gruen, D., Blazek, J., Friedrich, O., Samuroff, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043528 · Cited by 656
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van Uitert, E., Joachimi, B., Joudaki, S., Amon, A., Heymans, C., Köhlinger, F., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Choi, A., Erben, T., Farrow, D. J., Harnois-Déraps, J., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T. D., Klaes, D., Kuijken, K., Merten, J., Miller, L., Nakajima, R., Schneider, P., Valentijn, E., & Viola, M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-14
- Volume
- 476
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4662-4689
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2637453694
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sty551
- The paper
- van Uitert, E., Joachimi, B., Joudaki, S., Amon, A., Heymans, C., Köhlinger, F., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Choi, A., Erben, T., Farrow, D. J., Harnois-Déraps, J., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T. D., Klaes, D., Kuijken, K., Merten, J., Miller, L., . . . Viola, M. (2018). KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.