Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering

Open access
van Uitert, Edo, Joachimi, Benjamin, Joudaki, Shahab, Amon, Alexandra, Heymans, Catherine, Köhlinger, Fabian, Asgari, Marika, Blake, Chris, Choi, Ami, Erben, Thomas, Farrow, Daniel J, Harnois-Déraps, Joachim, Hildebrandt, Hendrik, Hoekstra, Henk, Kitching, Thomas D, Klaes, Dominik, Kuijken, Konrad, Merten, Julian, Miller, Lance, Nakajima, Reiko, Schneider, Peter, Valentijn, Edwin, Viola, Massimo·2018·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present cosmological parameter constraints from a joint analysis of three cosmological probes: the tomographic cosmic shear signal in ∼450 deg2 of data from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS), the galaxy-matter cross-correlation signal of galaxies from the Galaxies And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey determined with KiDS weak lensing, and the angular correlation function of the same GAMA galaxies. We use fast power spectrum estimators that are based on simple integrals over the real-space correlation functions, and show that they are practically unbiased over relevant angular frequency ranges. We test our full pipeline on numerical simulations that are tailored to KiDS and retrieve the input cosmology. By fitting different combinations of power spectra, we demonstrate that the three probes are internally consistent. For all probes combined, we obtain |$S_8\equiv \sigma _8 \sqrt{\Omega _{\rm m}/0.3}=0.800_{-0.027}^{+0.029}$|⁠, consistent with Planck and the fiducial KiDS-450 cosmic shear correlation function results. Marginalizing over wide priors on the mean of the tomographic redshift distributions yields consistent results for S8 with an increase of |$28\, {per \,cent}$| in the error. The combination of probes results in a 26 per cent reduction in uncertainties of S8 over using the cosmic shear power spectra alone. The main gain from these additional probes comes through their constraining power on nuisance parameters, such as the galaxy intrinsic alignment amplitude or potential shifts in the redshift distributions, which are up to a factor of 2 better constrained compared to using cosmic shear alone, demonstrating the value of large-scale structure probe combination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty551

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
van Uitert, E., Joachimi, B., Joudaki, S., Amon, A., Heymans, C., Köhlinger, F., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Choi, A., Erben, T., Farrow, D. J., Harnois-Déraps, J., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T. D., Klaes, D., Kuijken, K., Merten, J., Miller, L., Nakajima, R., Schneider, P., Valentijn, E., & Viola, M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-03-14
Volume
476
Issue
4
Pages
4662-4689
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2637453694
Cited by
239
References
4
FWCI
21.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sty551
The paper
van Uitert, E., Joachimi, B., Joudaki, S., Amon, A., Heymans, C., Köhlinger, F., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Choi, A., Erben, T., Farrow, D. J., Harnois-Déraps, J., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T. D., Klaes, D., Kuijken, K., Merten, J., Miller, L., . . . Viola, M. (2018). KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty551

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.