The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements – chemical evolution of magnesium and europium
Open accessAbstract
The distribution of elements in galaxies provides a wealth of information about their production sites and their subsequent mixing into the interstellar medium. Here we investigate the elemental distributions of stars in the IllustrisTNG simulations. We analyse the abundance ratios of magnesium and europium in Milky Way-like galaxies from the TNG100 simulation (stellar masses log (M⋆/M⊙) ∼ 9.7–11.2). Comparison of observed magnesium and europium for individual stars in the Milky Way with the stellar abundances in our more than 850 Milky Way-like galaxies provides stringent constraints on our chemical evolutionary methods. Here, we use the magnesium-to-iron ratio as a proxy for the effects of our SNII (core-collapse supernovae) and SNIa (Type Ia supernovae) metal return prescription and as a comparison to a variety of galactic observations. The europium-to-iron ratio tracks the rare ejecta from neutron star–neutron star mergers, the assumed primary site of europium production in our models, and is a sensitive probe of the effects of metal diffusion within the gas in our simulations. We find that europium abundances in Milky Way-like galaxies show no correlation with assembly history, present-day galactic properties, and average galactic stellar population age. We reproduce the europium-to-iron spread at low metallicities observed in the Milky Way, and find it is sensitive to gas properties during redshifts z ≈ 2–4. We show that while the overall normalization of [Eu/Fe] is susceptible to resolution and post-processing assumptions, the relatively large spread of [Eu/Fe] at low [Fe/H] when compared to that at high [Fe/H] is quite robust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
Self-citationStar-Formation Histories, Abundances, and Kinematics of Dwarf Galaxies in the Local Group
Tolstoy, E., Hill, V., & Tosi, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101650 · Cited by 1,179
The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way
McMillan, P. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 · Cited by 1,099 · cited 1×
“First, we select for galaxies with a total halo mass, M200,crit, in the range (0.6−2)×1012 M (Eadie et al. 2015; McMillan 2017; Zaritsky & Courtois 2017), which results in approximately 2000 galaxies.”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields
Marinacci, F., Vogelsberger, M., Pakmor, R., Torrey, P., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., Nelson, D., Weinberger, R., Pillepich, A., Naiman, J., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2206 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationPillepich, A., Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Torrey, P., Weinberger, R., Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Genel, S., van der Wel, A., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2338 · Cited by 916
Self-citationStreams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way
Helmi, A. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021917 · Cited by 407
Piotrowska, J. M., Bluck, A. F. L., Maiolino, R., & Peng, Y. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3673 · Cited by 156
The fraction of dark matter within galaxies from the IllustrisTNG simulations
Lovell, M. R., Pillepich, A., Genel, S., Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Marinacci, F., Weinberger, R., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2339 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Naiman, J. P., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Pakmor, R., Nelson, D., Marinacci, F., Hernquist, L., Weinberger, R., & Genel, S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-08
- Volume
- 477
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1206-1224
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2735531560
- Cited by
- 1,299
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 51.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements – chemical evolution of magnesium and europium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sty618
- The paper
- Naiman, J. P., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Pakmor, R., Nelson, D., Marinacci, F., Hernquist, L., Weinberger, R., & Genel, S. (2018). First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements – chemical evolution of magnesium and europium. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.