The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Massive optimal data compression and density estimation for scalable, likelihood-free inference in cosmology
Open accessAbstract
Many statistical models in cosmology can be simulated forwards but have intractable likelihood functions. Likelihood-free inference methods allow us to perform Bayesian inference from these models using only forward simulations, free from any likelihood assumptions or approximations. Likelihood-free inference generically involves simulating mock data and comparing to the observed data; this comparison in data space suffers from the curse of dimensionality and requires compression of the data to a small number of summary statistics to be tractable. In this paper, we use massive asymptotically optimal data compression to reduce the dimensionality of the data space to just one number per parameter, providing a natural and optimal framework for summary statistic choice for likelihood-free inference. Secondly, we present the first cosmological application of Density Estimation Likelihood-Free Inference (delfi), which learns a parametrized model for joint distribution of data and parameters, yielding both the parameter posterior and the model evidence. This approach is conceptually simple, requires less tuning than traditional Approximate Bayesian Computation approaches to likelihood-free inference and can give high-fidelity posteriors from orders of magnitude fewer forward simulations. As an additional bonus, it enables parameter inference and Bayesian model comparison simultaneously. We demonstrate delfi with massive data compression on an analysis of the joint light-curve analysis supernova data, as a simple validation case study. We show that high-fidelity posterior inference is possible for full-scale cosmological data analyses with as few as ∼104 simulations, with substantial scope for further improvement, demonstrating the scalability of likelihood-free inference to large and complex cosmological data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
Self-citationThe cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Toni, T., Welch, D., Strelkowa, N., Ipsen, A., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0172 · Cited by 1,498
Adaptive approximate Bayesian computation
Beaumont, M. A., Cornuet, J.-M., Marin, J.-M., & Robert, C. P. (2009) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asp052 · Cited by 614 · cited 1×
“Population Monte Carlo (pmc) and Sequential Monte Carlo (smc) abc methods (Del Moral et al. 2006; Sisson et al. 2007; Beaumont et al. 2009; Toni et al. 2009; Bonassi et al. 2015) are popular advancements on rejection abc that adaptively learn a more intelligent proposal distribution, whilst at the…”
MethodSimulation-based model selection for dynamical systems in systems and population biology
Toni, T., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp619 · Cited by 260
Cited by
The frontier of simulation-based inference
Cranmer, K., Brehmer, J., & Louppe, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912789117 · Cited by 1,032
Cosmological constraints with deep learning from KiDS-450 weak lensing maps
Fluri, J., Kacprzak, T., Lucchi, A., Refregier, A., Amara, A., Hofmann, T., & Schneider, A. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063514 · Cited by 151
Likelihood-free inference with neural compression of DES SV weak lensing map statistics
Jeffrey, N., Alsing, J., & Lanusse, F. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3594 · Cited by 123
Self-citationTranslation and rotation equivariant normalizing flow (TRENF) for optimal cosmological analysis
Dai, B., & Seljak, U. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2010 · Cited by 48
Simulation-based inference of dynamical galaxy cluster masses with 3D convolutional neural networks
Kodi Ramanah, D., Wojtak, R., & Arendse, N. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3922 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Alsing, J., Wandelt, B., & Feeney, S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-28
- Volume
- 477
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2874-2885
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2781708744
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Massive optimal data compression and density estimation for scalable, likelihood-free inference in cosmology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sty819
- The paper
- Alsing, J., Wandelt, B., & Feeney, S. (2018). Massive optimal data compression and density estimation for scalable, likelihood-free inference in cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.