The global star formation law by supernova feedback
Open accessAbstract
We address a simple model where the Kennicutt–Schmidt (KS) relation between the macroscopic densities of star formation rate (SFR, ρsfr) and gas (n) in galactic discs emerges from self-regulation of the SFR via supernova feedback. It arises from the physics of supernova bubbles, insensitive to the microscopic SFR recipe and not explicitly dependent on gravity. The key is that the filling factor of SFR-suppressed supernova bubbles self-regulates to a constant, f ∼ 0.5. Expressing the bubble fading radius and time in terms of n, the filling factor is $f\propto S\, n^{-s}$ with s ≃ 1.5, where S is the supernova rate density. A constant f thus refers to ρsfr ∝ n1.5, with a density-independent SFR efficiency per free-fall time ∼0.01. The self-regulation to f ∼ 0.5 and the convergence to a KS relation independent of the local SFR recipe are demonstrated in cosmological and isolated-galaxy simulations using different codes and recipes. In parallel, the spherical analysis of bubble evolution is generalized to clustered supernovae, analytically and via simulations, yielding s ≃ 1.5 ± 0.5. An analysis of photoionized bubbles about pre-supernova stars yields a range of KS slopes but the KS relation is dominated by the supernova bubbles. Superbubble blowouts may lead to an alternative self-regulation by outflows and recycling. While the model is oversimplified, its simplicity and validity in the simulations may argue that it captures the origin of the KS relation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the Loop-I is a local structure produced by the Sco-Cen OB association, the required power and age are about 2.5 × 10^38 erg s^-1 and about 3 Myr, respectively.
“Considering that the bubble has to reach ≃ 150 pc and should have a Mach number of ≃ 2 (in a medium with a sound speed of 15 km s -1 ), the required power and the age are ≃ 2 . 5 × 10 38 erg s -1 and ≃ 3 Myr, respectively (see eq 52 & 53 of Dekel et al. 2019).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Dekel et al. 2019
Cites
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155667 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY IN NEARBY GALAXIES: MEASURING WHERE GAS FORMS STARS EFFECTIVELY
Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Madore, B., & Thornley, M. D. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782 · Cited by 1,919 · see citing works
Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium
Draine, B. T. (2011) · doi:10.1515/9781400839087 · Cited by 1,787 · see citing works
Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155692 · Cited by 1,736 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“5 × 10 38 erg s − 1 and ≃ 3 Myr, respectively (see eq 52 & 53 of Dekel et al. 2019).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dekel, A., Sarkar, K. C., Jiang, F., Bournaud, F., Krumholz, M. R., Ceverino, D., & Primack, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
- Australian National University (AU)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Dekel, Avishai
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-07-15
- Volume
- 488
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4753-4778
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2919488636
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- France-Israel PICS
- Germany-Israel GIF (I-1341-303.7/2016)
- Germany-Israel DIP (STE1869/2-1 GE625/17-1)
- I-CORE
- Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education of Israel
- Israel Science Foundation (1829/12, 857/14)
- United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation (2014-273)
- National Science Foundation (AST-1405962)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- NASA Ames Research Center
- Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif (A0030402192, A0050402192)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- Kennicutt-Schmidt relation, star formation law, supernova feedback, filling factor, Galactic disc, galactic outflows, gas density dependence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review