Cited by 409Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Constraining self-interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidals

Open access
Zavala, Jesús, Vogelsberger, Mark, Walker, Matthew G.·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters

Abstract

Self-interacting dark matter is an attractive alternative to the cold dark matter paradigm only if it is able to substantially reduce the central densities of dwarf-size haloes while keeping the densities and shapes of cluster-size haloes within current constraints. Given the seemingly stringent nature of the latter, it was thought for nearly a decade that self-interacting dark matter would be viable only if the cross-section for self-scattering was strongly velocity dependent. However, it has recently been suggested that a constant cross-section per unit mass of σT/m ∼ 0.1 cm2 g−1 is sufficient to accomplish the desired effect. We explicitly investigate this claim using high-resolution cosmological simulations of a Milky Way-size halo and find that, similarly to the cold dark matter case, such cross-section produces a population of massive subhaloes that is inconsistent with the kinematics of the classical dwarf spheroidals, in particular with the inferred slopes of the mass profiles of Fornax and Sculptor. This problem is resolved if σT/m ∼ 1 cm2 g−1 at the dwarf spheroidal scales. Since this value is likely inconsistent with the halo shapes of several clusters, our results leave only a small window open for a velocity-independent self-interacting dark matter model to work as a distinct alternative to cold dark matter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnrasl/sls053

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results place the constraint in mild tension with existing SIDM models that require σ/m ≳ 1 cm^2 g^-1 to resolve small-scale discrepancies in dwarf and spiral galaxies.

    “These results place our constraint in mild tension with existing SIDM models that require σ/m ≳ 1 cm 2 g -1 to resolve small-scale discrepancies in dwarf and spiral galaxies (J.Zavala et al. 2013;O. D. Elbert et al. 2015;M. Kaplinghat et al. 2016).”

    From A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters (2026) · cites this paper as J. Zavala et al. 2013

    The Simulations and Results section (p. 2) says that a constant SIDM cross section of σT/m ≳ 1 cm² g⁻¹ can alleviate the too-big-to-fail problem for Milky Way dwarf spheroidals. The Introduction (p. 1) identifies cores in dwarf and low-surface-brightness galaxies as a broader discrepancy, but the paper does not establish that the stated threshold is required for spiral galaxies. The citing authors’ own ‘mild tension’ assessment is not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Aprile E., et al., 2012, Physical Review Letters, 109, 181301
  2. Brooks A. M., Zolotov A., 2012, arXiv:1207.2468 · arXiv
  3. Feng J. L., Kaplinghat M., Yu H.-B., 2010, Physical Review Letters, 104, 151301
  4. Loeb A., Weiner N., 2011, Physical Review Letters, 106, 171302
  5. Peter A. H. G., Rocha M., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M., 2012, arXiv:1208.3026 · arXiv
  6. Rocha M., Peter A. H. G., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M., GarrisonKimmel S., Onorbe J., Moustakas L. A., 2012, arXiv:1208.3025 · arXiv
  7. Spergel D. N., Steinhardt P. J., 2000, Physical Review Letters, 84, 3760
  8. Tulin S., Yu H.-B., Zurek K. M., 2012, arXiv:1210.0900 · arXiv
  9. van den Aarssen L. G., Bringmann T., Pfrommer C., 2012, arXiv:1205.5809 · arXiv
  10. Vogelsberger M., Zavala J., 2012, arXiv:1211.1377 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavala, J., Vogelsberger, M., & Walker, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Zavala, Jesús
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
Published
2013-02-01
Volume
431
Issue
1
Pages
L20-L24
ISSN
  • 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3933
OpenAlex
W1969043344
Cited by
409
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 12
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Space Telescope Science Institute
  • Government of Canada
  • Industry Canada
  • University of Waterloo
  • Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
self-interacting dark matter, dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Galactic halo, Fornax, sculptors, halo shape, cosmological hydrodynamical simulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review