Cited by 65Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Rubisco Adaptation Is More Limited by Phylogenetic Constraint Than by Catalytic Trade-off

Open access
Bouvier, Jacques W, Emms, David M, Rhodes, Timothy, Bolton, Jai S, Brasnett, Amelia, Eddershaw, Alice, Nielsen, Jochem R, Unitt, Anastasia +2 more·2021·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Rubisco assimilates CO2 to form the sugars that fuel life on earth. Correlations between rubisco kinetic traits across species have led to the proposition that rubisco adaptation is highly constrained by catalytic trade-offs. However, these analyses did not consider the phylogenetic context of the enzymes that were analyzed. Thus, it is possible that the correlations observed were an artefact of the presence of phylogenetic signal in rubisco kinetics and the phylogenetic relationship between the species that were sampled. Here, we conducted a phylogenetically resolved analysis of rubisco kinetics and show that there is a significant phylogenetic signal in rubisco kinetic traits. We re-evaluated the extent of catalytic trade-offs accounting for this phylogenetic signal and found that all were attenuated. Following phylogenetic correction, the largest catalytic trade-offs were observed between the Michaelis constant for CO2 and carboxylase turnover (∼21–37%), and between the Michaelis constants for CO2 and O2 (∼9–19%), respectively. All other catalytic trade-offs were substantially attenuated such that they were marginal (<9%) or non-significant. This phylogenetically resolved analysis of rubisco kinetic evolution also identified kinetic changes that occur concomitant with the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Finally, we show that phylogenetic constraints have played a larger role than catalytic trade-offs in limiting the evolution of rubisco kinetics. Thus, although there is strong evidence for some catalytic trade-offs, rubisco adaptation has been more limited by phylogenetic constraint than by the combined action of all catalytic trade-offs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msab079

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The problem of species not being independent can be exacerbated by additional levels of non-independence, including genes within genomes and genomes of the same or closely related species.

    “In genomic datasets, data points can correspond to genomes or even individual genes, meaning the problem of species not being independent can be exacerbated by additional levels of non-independence, including genes within genomes, such as those carried on the same replicon, and genomes of the same or closely related species16,19,21–26.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction explains that Rubisco measurements from closely related species are non-independent because of shared ancestry. The paper does not address the claimed additional levels of non-independence among genes within a genome or among multiple genomes of the same species; the Materials and Methods discuss species-level phylogenetic correction instead. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The problem of non-independence can be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes.

    “This problem of non-independence can be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction explains that rubisco genes share ancestry, making measurements from closely related species non-independent. The Results confirm this for carboxylase-related kinetic traits in angiosperms, but the paper does not establish that non-independence is generally exacerbated when examining genomes or genes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 120

  1. Abouheif E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol Ecol Res. 1(8): 895– 909.
  2. Ackerly DD. 2004. Adaptation, niche conservatism, and convergence: comparative studies of leaf evolution in the California chaparral. Am Nat. 163(5): 654– 671. 15122485
  3. Aigner H, Wilson RH, Bracher A, Calisse L, Bhat JY, Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. 2017. Plant RuBisCo assembly in E. coli with five chloroplast chaperones including BSD2’. Science 358(6368): 1272– 1278. 29217567
  4. Andersson I, Backlund A. 2008. Structure and function of Rubisco. Plant Physiol Biochem. 46(3): 275– 291. 18294858
  5. Andrews TJ. 1988. Catalysis by cyanobacterial ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase large subunits in the complete absence of small subunits. J Biol Chem. 263(25): 12213– 12219. 3137223
  6. Andrews TJ, Whitney SM. 2003. Manipulating ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in the chloroplasts of higher plants. Arch Biochem Biophys. 414(2): 159– 169. 12781767
  7. Ehleringer JR Sage RF Flanagan LB Pearcy RW. 1991. Climate change and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 6(3): 95– 99. 21232434
  8. APG. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linnean Soc. 181(1): 1– 20.
  9. Badger MR, Lorimer GH. 1976. Activation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate oxygenase. The role of Mg2+, CO2, and pH’. Arch Biochem Biophys. 175(2): 723– 729. 8715
  10. Banda DM, Pereira JH, Liu AK, Orr DJ, Hammel M, He C, Parry MAJ, Carmo-Silva E, Adams PD, Banfield JF, et al 2020. Novel bacterial clade reveals origin of form I Rubisco’. Nat Plants. 6(9): 1158– 1166. 32868887
  11. Bar-Even A, Noor E, Savir Y, Liebermeister W, Davidi D, Tawfik DS, Milo R. 2011. The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters’. Biochemistry 50(21): 4402– 4410. 21506553
  12. Bar-On YM, Milo R. 2019. The global mass and average rate of rubisco’. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 116(10): 4738– 4743. 30782794 PMC6410859
  13. Bathellier C, Tcherkez G, Lorimer GH, Farquhar GD. 2018. Rubisco is not really so bad’. Plant Cell Environ. 41(4): 705– 716. 29359811
  14. Bauwe H, Hagemann M, Kern R, Timm S. 2012. Photorespiration has a dual origin and manifold links to central metabolism’. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 15(3): 269– 275. 22284850
  15. Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E, Ciais P, Jung M, Carvalhais N, Rödenbeck C, Arain MA, Baldocchi D, Bonan GB, et al 2010. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate’. Science 329(5993): 834– 838. 20603496
  16. Birky CW. 2001. The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: laws, mechanisms, and models. Annu Rev Genet. 35(1): 125– 148. 11700280
  17. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57(4):717–745. 12778543
  18. Bowes G, Ogren WL, Hageman RH. 1971. Phosphoglycolate production catalyzed by ribulose diphosphate carboxylase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 45(3): 716– 722. 4331471
  19. Bradshaw A. 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 333(1267): 289– 305. 1682961
  20. Busch FA. 2020. Photorespiration in the context of rubisco biochemistry, CO2 diffusion and metabolism. Plant J. 101(4): 919– 939. 31910295
  21. Carlin DA, Caster RW, Wang X, Betzenderfer SA, Chen CX, Duong VM, Ryklansky CV, Alpekin A, Beaumont N, Kapoor H, et al 2016. Kinetic characterization of 100 glycoside hydrolase mutants enables the discovery of structural features correlated with kinetic constants’. PLoS One 11(1): e0147596. 26815142 PMC4729467
  22. Carmo-Silva E, Scales JC, Madgwick PJ, Parry MAJ. 2015. Optimizing rubisco and its regulation for greater resource use efficiency. Plant Cell Environ. 1817– 1832. 25123951
  23. Cavender-Bares J, Ackerly DD, Baum DA, Bazzaz FA. 2004. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. Am Nat. 163(6): 823– 843. 15266381
  24. Cheverud JM, Dow MM, Leutenegger W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39(6): 1335– 1351. 28564267
  25. Cheverud JM, Dow MM, Leutenegger W. 1986. A phylogenetic autocorrelation analysis of sexual dimorphism in primates. Am Anthropol. 88(4): 916– 922.
  26. Chollet R. 1977. The biochemistry of photorespiration. Trends Biochem Sci. 2(7): 155– 159.
  27. Chollet R, Anderson LL. 1976. Regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase activities by temperature pretreatment and chloroplast metabolites’. Arch Biochem Biophys. 176(1): 344– 351. 970962
  28. Cleton-Jansen AM, Dekker S, van de Putte P, Goosen N. 1991. A single amino acid substitution changes the substrate specificity of quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase in Gluconobacter oxydans. Mol General Genet. 229(2): 206– 212. 1833618
  29. Cleton-Jansen AM, et al 1991. A single amino acid substitution changes the substrate specificity of quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase in Gluconobacter oxydans. Mol General Genet. 229(2): 206– 212. 1833618
  30. Cummins PL, Kannappan B, Gready JE. 2018. Directions for optimization of photosynthetic carbon fixation: rubisco’s efficiency may not be so constrained after all. Front Plant Sci. 9: 183. 29545812 PMC5838012
  31. Damborsky J, Brezovsky J. 2014. Computational tools for designing and engineering enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 19: 8– 16. 24780274
  32. Davidi D, Longo LM, Jabłońska J, Milo R, Tawfik DS. 2018. A bird’s-eye view of enzyme evolution: chemical, physicochemical, and physiological considerations. Chem Rev. 118(18): 8786– 8797. 30133258
  33. Davidi D, Shamshoum M, Guo Z, Bar‐On YM, Prywes N, Oz A, Jablonska J, Flamholz A, Wernick DG, Antonovsky N, et al 2020. Highly active rubiscos discovered by systematic interrogation of natural sequence diversity. EMBO J. 39(18): e104081. 32500941 PMC7507306
  34. Duraõ P, et al 2015. Opposing effects of folding and assembly chaperones on evolvability of Rubisco. Nat Chem Biol. 11(2): 148– 155. 25558973
  35. Eckardt NA. 2005. Photorespiration revisited. Plant Cell. 17(8): 2139– 2141.
  36. Edwards EJ. 2019. Evolutionary trajectories, accessibility and other metaphors: the case of C4 and CAM photosynthesis. New Phytol. 223(4): 1742– 1755. 30993711
  37. Edwards SV, Naeem S. 1993. The phylogenetic component of cooperative breeding in perching birds. Am Nat. 141(5): 754– 789. 19426009
  38. Ehleringer JR Sage RF Flanagan LB Pearcy RW. 1991. Climate change and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 6(3): 95– 99. 21232434
  39. Ellis RJ. 1979. The most abundant protein in the world. Trends Biochem Sci. 4(11): 241– 244.
  40. Erb TJ, Zarzycki J. 2018. A short history of RubisCO: the rise and fall (?) of Nature’s predominant CO2 fixing enzyme. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 49: 100– 107. 28843191 PMC7610757
  41. Espie GS, Kimber MS. 2011. Carboxysomes: cyanobacterial RubisCO comes in small packages. Photosynth Res. 109(1–3): 7– 20. 21556873
  42. Farquhar GD. 1979. Models describing the kinetics of ribulose biphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 193(2): 456– 468. 464606
  43. Flamholz AI, Prywes N, Moran U, Davidi D, Bar-On YM, Oltrogge LM, Alves R, Savage D, Milo R. 2019. Revisiting trade-offs between rubisco kinetic parameters. Biochemistry 58(31): 3365– 3376. 31259528 PMC6686151
  44. Flamholz A, Shih PM. 2020. Cell biology of photosynthesis over geologic time. Curr Biol. 30(10): R490– R494. 32428488
  45. Fukayama H, Kobara T, Shiomi K, Morita R, Sasayama D, Hatanaka T, Azuma T. 2019. Rubisco small subunits of C4 plants, Napier grass and guinea grass confer C4-like catalytic properties on Rubisco in rice. Plant Prod Sci. 22(2): 296– 300.
  46. Garland T. 2001. Phylogenetic Comparison and Artificial Selection. Boston: Springer. p. 107– 132. 11950133
  47. Gielly L, Taberlet P. 1994. The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenies: noncoding versus rbcL sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 11(5): 769– 777. 7968490
  48. Gittleman JL, Kot M. 1990. Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst Zool. 39(3): 227– 241.
  49. Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 326(1233): 119– 157. 2575770
  50. Gunn LH, Martin Avila E, Birch R, Whitney SM. 2020. The dependency of red Rubisco on its cognate activase for enhancing plant photosynthesis and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117(41): 25890– 25896. 32989135 PMC7568259
  51. Hardy OJ, Pavoine S. 2012. Assessing phylogenetic signal with measurement error: a comparison of mantel tests, Blomberg et al.’s K, and phylogenetic distograms. Evolution 66(8): 2614– 2621. 22834757
  52. Hatch MD. 1987. C4 photosynthesis: a unique elend of modified biochemistry, anatomy and ultrastructure. BBA Rev Bioenerget. 895(2): 81– 106.
  53. Huson DH, Scornavacca C. 2012. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol. 61(6): 1061– 1067. 22780991
  54. Iñiguez C, Capó-Bauçà S, Niinemets Ü, Stoll H, Aguiló-Nicolau P, Galmés J. 2020. Evolutionary trends in RuBisCO kinetics and their co-evolution with CO2 concentrating mechanisms. Plant J. 101(4): 897– 918. 31820505
  55. Ishikawa C, Hatanaka T, Misoo S, Miyake C, Fukayama H. 2011. Functional incorporation of sorghum small subunit increases the catalytic turnover rate of rubisco in transgenic rice. Plant Physiol. 156(3): 1603– 1611. 21562335 PMC3135941
  56. Ives A, Li D. 2018. rr2: an R package to calculate $R^2$s for regression models. JOSS 3(30): 1028.
  57. Ives AR. 2019. R 2 s for correlated data: phylogenetic models, LMMs, and GLMMs. Syst Biol. 68(2): 234– 251. 30239975
  58. Johnson ET, Ryu S, Yi H, Shin B, Cheong H, Choi G. 2001. Alteration of a single amino acid changes the substrate specificity of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase. Plant J. 25(3): 325– 333. 11208024
  59. Joshi J, Mueller-Cajar O, Tsai Y-CC, Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. 2015. Role of small subunit in mediating assembly of red-type Form I Rubisco’. J Biol Chem. 290(2): 1066– 1074. 25371207 PMC4294474
  60. Kamilar JM, Cooper N. 2013. Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Philos Trans R Soc B. 368(1618): 20120341. PMC3638444 23569289
  61. Kane HJ, et al 1994. An improved method for measuring the CO2/O2 specificity of ribulosebisphosphatte carboxylase-oxygenase. Aust J Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1071/PP9940449. · DOI
  62. Kaplan A, Schwarz R, Lieman-Hurwitz J, Reinhold L. 1991. Physiological and molecular aspects of the inorganic carbon-concentrating mechanism in cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol. 97(3): 851– 855. 16668522 PMC1081095
  63. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4): 772– 780. 23329690 PMC3603318
  64. Keck F, Rimet F, Bouchez A, Franc A. 2016. Phylosignal: an R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal. Ecol Evol. 6(9): 2774– 2780. 27066252 PMC4799788
  65. Kelly S. 2018. The amount of nitrogen used for photosynthesis modulates molecular evolution in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 35(7): 1616– 1625. 29684170 PMC5995192
  66. Kimura M. 1991. The neutral theory of molecular evolution: a review of recent evidence. Jpn J Genet. 66(4): 367– 386. 1954033
  67. Larsson A. 2014. AliView: A fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 30(22): 3276– 3278. 25095880 PMC4221126
  68. Lee B, Berka RM, Tabita FR. 1991. Mutations in the small subunit of cyanobacterial ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase that modulate interactions with large subunits. J Biol Chem. 266(12): 7417– 7422. 1902220
  69. Lee B, Tabita FR. 1990. Purification of recombinant ribulose-l,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunits suitable for reconstitution and assembly of active L8S8 enzyme. Biochemistry 29(40): 9352– 9357. 2123399
  70. Leebens-Mack JH, Barker MS, Carpenter EJ, Deyholos MK, Gitzendanner MA, Graham SW, Grosse I, Li Z, Melkonian M, Mirarab S and Porsch M. 2019. One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants. Nature. 574(7780): 679– 685. 31645766 PMC6872490
  71. Martin-Avila E, Lim Y-L, Birch R, Dirk LMA, Buck S, Rhodes T, Sharwood RE, Kapralov MV, Whitney SM. 2020. Modifying plant photosynthesis and growth via simultaneous chloroplast transformation of rubisco large and small subunits. Plant Cell 32(9): 2898– 2916. 32647068 PMC7474299
  72. Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D, Wolpert L. 1985. Developmental Constraints and Evolution: A Perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on Development and Evolution. Q Rev Biol. 60(3): 265– 287.
  73. Meyer M, Griffiths H. 2013. Origins and diversity of eukaryotic CO2-concentrating mechanisms: lessons for the future. J Exp Bot. 64(3): 769– 786. 23345319
  74. Minshull J, Ness JE, Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S. 2005. Predicting enzyme function from protein sequence. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 9(2): 202– 209. 15811806
  75. Moles AT, Ackerly DD, Webb CO, Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, Westoby M. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307(5709): 576– 580. 15681384
  76. Münkemüller T, Lavergne S, Bzeznik B, Dray S, Jombart T, Schiffers K, Thuiller W. 2012. How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol Evol. 3(4): 743– 756.
  77. Murashov VV, Morozova ZA. 2008. Comparative morphogenesis of Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.) and synthetic octoploid species T. timonovum Heslot et Ferrary. Moscow Univ Biol Sci Bull. 63(3): 127– 133.
  78. Nevo O, Valenta K, Kleiner A, Razafimandimby D, Jeffrey JAJ, Chapman CA, Ayasse M. 2020. The evolution of fruit scent: phylogenetic and developmental constraints. BMC Evol Biol. 20(1): 138. 33109084 PMC7590443
  79. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 32(1): 268– 274. 25371430 PMC4271533
  80. Nisbet EG, Grassineau NV, Howe CJ, Abell PI, Regelous M, Nisbet RER. 2007. The age of rubisco: the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis. Geobiology 5(4): 311– 335.
  81. Ogren WL. 1984. Photorespiration: pathways, regulation, and modification. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 35(1): 415– 442.
  82. Ogren WL, Bowes G. 1971. Ribulose diphosphate carboxylase regulates soybean photorespiration. Nat New Biol. 230(13): 159– 160. 5279476
  83. Orr DJ, Alcântara A, Kapralov MV, Andralojc PJ, Carmo-Silva E, Parry MAJ. 2016. Surveying rubisco diversity and temperature response to improve crop photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Physiol. 172(2): 707– 717. 27342312 PMC5047088
  84. Orr DJ, Pereira AM, da Fonseca Pereira P, Pereira-Lima ÍA, Zsögön A, Araújo WL. 2017. Engineering photosynthesis: progress and perspectives. F1000Res. 6: 1891. 29263782 PMC5658708
  85. Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution’. Nature 401(6756): 877– 884. 10553904
  86. Pagel MD, Harvey PH. 1989. Comparative methods for examining adaptation depend on evolutionary models. Folia Primatol. 53(1-4): 203– 220. 2691365
  87. Parry MAJ, Andralojc PJ, Scales JC, Salvucci ME, Carmo-Silva AE, Alonso H, Whitney SM. 2013. Rubisco activity and regulation as targets for crop improvement. J Exp Bot. 64(3): 717– 730. 23162118
  88. Parry MAJ, Keys AJ, Gutteridge S. 1989. Variation in the specificity factor of C3 higher plant rubiscos determined by the total consumption of ribulose-P2. J Exp Bot. 40(3): 317– 320.
  89. Peterhansel C, Horst I, Niessen M, Blume C, Kebeish R, Kürkcüoglu S, Kreuzaler F. 2010. ‘Photorespiration’. Arabidopsis Book. BioOne 8(8): e0130. PMC3244903 22303256
  90. Prins A, Orr DJ, Andralojc PJ, Reynolds MP, Carmo-Silva E, Parry MAJ. 2016. Rubisco catalytic properties of wild and domesticated relatives provide scope for improving wheat photosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 67(6): 1827– 1838. 26798025 PMC4783365
  91. Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R. 2001. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc Biol Sci. 268(1483): 2383– 2389. 11703879 PMC1088890
  92. Read BA, Tabita FR. 1992a. A hybrid ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase enzyme exhibiting a substantial increase in substrate specificity factor. Biochemistry 31(24): 5553– 5560. 1610800
  93. Read BA, Tabita FR. 1992b. Amino acid substitutions in the small subunit of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase that influence catalytic activity of the holoenzyme. Biochemistry 31(2): 519– 525. 1731909
  94. Rohlf FJ. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55(11): 2143– 2160. 11794776
  95. Sage RF, Sage TL, Kocacinar F. 2012. Photorespiration and the evolution of c 4 photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 63(1): 19– 47. 22404472
  96. Savir Y, Noor E, Milo R, Tlusty T. 2010. Cross-species analysis traces adaptation of Rubisco toward optimality in a low-dimensional landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(8): 3475– 3480. 20142476 PMC2840432
  97. Schneider G, Lindqvist Y, Brändén CI. 1992. RUBISCO: structure and mechanism. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 21(1): 119– 143. 1525466
  98. Seward EA, Kelly S. 2018. Selection-driven cost-efficiency optimization of transcripts modulates gene evolutionary rate in bacteria. Genome Biol. 19(1): 102. 30064467 PMC6066932
  99. Sharkey TD. 2020. Emerging research in plant photosynthesis. Emerg Top Life Sci. 4(2): 137– 150. 32573736
  100. Sharwood RE. 2017. Engineering chloroplasts to improve Rubisco catalysis: prospects for translating improvements into food and fiber crops. New Phytol. 213(2): 494– 510. 27935049
  101. Sharwood RE, Ghannoum O, Whitney SM. 2016. Prospects for improving CO2 fixation in C3-crops through understanding C4-Rubisco biogenesis and catalytic diversity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 31: 135– 142. 27131319
  102. Siegel JB, Smith AL, Poust S, Wargacki AJ, Bar-Even A, Louw C, Shen BW, Eiben CB, Tran HM, Noor E, et al 2015. Computational protein design enables a novel one-carbon assimilation pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(12): 3704– 3709. 25775555 PMC4378393
  103. Smith DR. 2015. Mutation rates in plastid genomes: they are lower than you might think. Genome Biol Evol. 7(5): 1227– 1234. 25869380 PMC4453064
  104. Spreitzer RJ, Peddi SR, Satagopan S. 2005. Phylogenetic engineering at an interface between large and small subunits imparts land-plant kinetic properties to algal Rubisco. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(47): 17225– 17230. 16282373 PMC1287997
  105. Spriggs EL, Christin PA, Edwards EJ. 2014. C4 photosynthesis promoted species diversification during the iocene grassland expansion. PLoS One 9(5): e97722. 24835188 PMC4023962
  106. Studer RA, Christin P-A, Williams MA, Orengo CA. 2014. Stability-activity tradeoffs constrain the adaptive evolution of RubisCO. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(6): 2223– 2228. 24469821 PMC3926066
  107. Su Z, Townsend JP. 2015. Utility of characters evolving at diverse rates of evolution to resolve quartet trees with unequal branch lengths: analytical predictions of long-branch effects. BMC Evol Biol. 15: 86. 25968460 PMC4429678
  108. Swenson NG, Enquist BJ. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation. Am J Bot. 94(3): 451– 459. 21636415
  109. Tabita FR, Satagopan S, Hanson TE, Kreel NE, Scott SS. 2008. Distinct form I, II, III, and IV Rubisco proteins from the three kingdoms of life provide clues about Rubisco evolution and structure/function relationships. J Exp Bot. 59(7): 1515– 1524. 18281717
  110. Tcherkez G. 2013. Modelling the reaction mechanism of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and consequences for kinetic parameters. Plant Cell Environ. 36(9): 1586– 1596. 23305122
  111. Tcherkez GGB, Farquhar GD, Andrews TJ. 2006. Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103(19): 7246– 7251. 16641091 PMC1464328
  112. Tung Ho LS, Ané C. 2014. A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst Biol. 63(3): 397– 408. 24500037
  113. Villar KD, Mitsuzawa H, Yang W, Sattler I, Tamanoi F. 1997. Amino acid substitutions that convert the protein substrate specificity of farnesyltransferase to that of geranylgeranyltransferase type I. J Biol Chem. 272(1): 680– 687. 8995312
  114. Wagner PJ. 1995. Testing evolutionary constraint hypotheses with early paleozoic gastropods. Paleobiology 21(3): 248– 272.
  115. Whitney SM, Houtz RL, Alonso H. 2011. Advancing our understanding and capacity to engineer nature’s CO2-sequestering enzyme, Rubisco. Plant Physiol. 155(1): 27– 35. 20974895 PMC3075749
  116. Wilson RH, Martin-Avila E, Conlan C, Whitney SM. 2018. An improved Escherichia coli screen for Rubisco identifies a protein-protein interface that can enhance CO2-fixation kinetics. J Biol Chem. 293(1): 18– 27. 28986448 PMC5766918
  117. Wilson RH, Alonso H, Whitney SM. 2016. Evolving Methanococcoides burtonii archaeal Rubisco for improved photosynthesis and plant growth. Sci Rep. 6(1): 22284. 26926260 PMC4772096
  118. Wolfe KH, Li WH, Sharp PM. 1987. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 84(24): 9054– 9058. 3480529 PMC299690
  119. Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT‐Y. 2017. ggtree: an r package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 8(1): 28– 36.
  120. Zhou Y, Whitney S. 2019. Directed evolution of an improved Rubisco; in vitro analyses to decipher fact from fiction. Int J Mol Sci. 20(20): 5019. PMC6834295 31658746

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouvier, J. W., Emms, D. M., Rhodes, T., Bolton, J. S., Brasnett, A., Eddershaw, A., Nielsen, J. R., Unitt, A., Whitney, S. M., & Kelly, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Steven
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2021-03-19
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
2880-2896
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W3137932374
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Royal Society and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (637765)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M011224/1, BB/P003117/1)
  • Australian Government through the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis (CE140100015)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
Rubisco, phylogenetic constraints, enzyme kinetics, C4 photosynthesis, phylogenetic signal, evolution of photosynthesis, Rubisco activase
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Kinetics, Photosynthesis, Phylogeny, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Triticum, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review