Cited by 46Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Evidence for Selection in the Abundant Accessory Gene Content of a Prokaryote Pangenome

Open access
Whelan, Fiona J, Hall, Rebecca J, McInerney, James O·2021·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

A pangenome is the complete set of genes (core and accessory) present in a phylogenetic clade. We hypothesize that a pangenome’s accessory gene content is structured and maintained by selection. To test this hypothesis, we interrogated the genomes of 40 Pseudomonas species for statistically significant coincident (i.e., co-occurring/avoiding) gene patterns. We found that 86.7% of common accessory genes are involved in ≥1 coincident relationship. Further, genes that co-occur and/or avoid each other—but are not vertically inherited—are more likely to share functional categories, are more likely to be simultaneously transcribed, and are more likely to produce interacting proteins, than would be expected by chance. These results are not due to coincident genes being adjacent to one another on the chromosome. Together, these findings suggest that the accessory genome is structured into sets of genes that function together within a given strain. Given the similarity of the Pseudomonas pangenome with open pangenomes of other prokaryotic species, we speculate that these results are generalizable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msab139

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Testing whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link.

    “To distinguish which scenario is more likely, we could test whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait, which would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link42,43,51,85–87 (Fig. 3).”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Methods section describes testing gene-pair presence and absence patterns, not whether ancestral changes in one trait are consistently followed by changes in another. The Discussion says this method misses asymmetrical dependencies and calls for further investigation of direct interactions, but does not propose the claimed ancestral-change test or say that its result would suggest a causal link (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Abadi S, Azouri D, Pupko T, Mayrose I. 2019. Model selection may not be a mandatory step for phylogeny reconstruction. Nat Commun. 10(1): 934. 30804347 PMC6389923
  2. Andreani NA, Hesse E, Vos M. 2017. Prokaryote genome fluidity is dependent on effective population size. ISME J. 11(7): 1719– 1721. 28362722 PMC5520154
  3. Azarian T, Huang I-T, Hanage WP. 2020. Structure and dynamics of bacterial populations: pangenome ecology. In: Tettelin H, Medini D, editors. The pangenome: diversity, dynamics and evolution of genomes. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 115– 128. 32633912
  4. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Available from: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154
  5. Blanchet FG, Cazelles K, Gravel D. 2020. Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol Lett. 23(7): 1050– 1063. 32429003
  6. Bobay L-M, Ochman H. 2018. Factors driving effective population size and pan-genome evolution in bacteria. BMC Evol Biol. 18(1): 153. 30314447 PMC6186134
  7. Cao Q, Wang Y, Chen F, Xia Y, Lou J, Zhang X, Yang N, Sun X, Zhang Q, Zhuo C, et al 2014. A novel signal transduction pathway that modulates rhl quorum sensing and bacterial virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 10(8): e1004340. 25166864 PMC4148453
  8. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17(4): 540– 552. 10742046
  9. Cohen O, Ashkenazy H, Burstein D, Pupko T. 2012. Uncovering the co-evolutionary network among prokaryotic genes. Bioinformatics 28(18): i389–i 394. 22962457 PMC3436823
  10. Connor EF, Simberloff D. 1979. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60(6): 1132.
  11. Creevey CJ, Doerks T, Fitzpatrick DA, Raes J, Bork P. 2011. Universally distributed single-copy genes indicate a constant rate of horizontal transfer. PLoS One 6(8): e22099. 21850220 PMC3151239
  12. Cui Y, Yang C, Qiu H, Wang H, Yang R, Falush D. 2020. The landscape of coadaptation in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. eLife 9:e54136. PMC7101233 32195663
  13. Decano AG, Downing T. 2019. An Escherichia coli ST131 pangenome atlas reveals population structure and evolution across 4,071 isolates. Sci Rep. 9(1):17394. PMC6874702 31758048
  14. Denton JF, Lugo-Martinez J, Tucker AE, Schrider DR, Warren WC, Hahn MW. 2014. Extensive error in the number of genes inferred from draft genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol. 10(12): e1003998. 25474019 PMC4256071
  15. Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma PW. 2006. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 70(4): 939– 1031. 17158705 PMC1698508
  16. Diamond J. 1975. Assembly of species communities. In: Diamond J, Cody M, editors. Ecology and evolution of communities. Boston: Harvard University Press. p. 342– 344.
  17. Dillon MM, Thakur S, Almeida RN, Wang PW, Weir BS, Guttman DS. 2019. Recombination of ecologically and evolutionarily significant loci maintains genetic cohesion in the Pseudomonas syringae species complex. Genome Biol. 20: 3. 30606234 PMC6317194
  18. Ding W, Baumdicker F, Neher RA. 2018. panX: pan-genome analysis and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 46(1): e5. 29077859 PMC5758898
  19. Draghi JA, Turner PE. 2006. DNA secretion and gene-level selection in bacteria. Microbiology 152(9): 2683– 2688. 16946263
  20. Erni B, Zanolari B, Kocher HP. 1987. The mannose permease of Escherichia coli consists of three different proteins. J Biol Chem. 262(11): 5238– 5247. 2951378
  21. Forbes SA. 1907. On the local distribution of certain Illinois fishes: an essay in statistical ecology. INHS Bull. 7(1–10): 273– 297.
  22. Freschi L, Vincent AT, Jeukens J, Emond-Rheault JG, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Dupont MJ, Charette SJ, Boyle B, Levesque RC. 2019. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa pan-genome provides new insights on its population structure, horizontal gene transfer, and pathogenicity. Genome Biol Evol. 11(1): 109– 120. 30496396 PMC6328365
  23. Fritz SA, Purvis A. 2010. Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conserv Biol. 24(4): 1042– 1051. 20184650
  24. Gautreau G, Bazin A, Gachet M, Planel R, Burlot L, Dubois M, Perrin A, Médigue C, Calteau A, Cruveiller S, et al 2020. PPanGGOLiN: depicting microbial diversity via a partitioned pangenome graph. PLoS Comput Biol. 16(3): e1007732. 32191703 PMC7108747
  25. Goyal A. 2018. Metabolic adaptations underlying genome flexibility in prokaryotes. PLoS Genet. 14(10): e1007763. 30372443 PMC6224172
  26. Guilloton MB, Lamblin AF, Kozliak EI, Gerami-Nejad M, Tu C, Silverman D, Anderson PM, Fuchs JA. 1993. A physiological role for cyanate-induced carbonic anhydrase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. PMC193231 8444806
  27. Hiller NL, Sá-Leão R. 2018. Puzzling over the pneumococcal pangenome. Front Microbiol. 9: 2580. 30425695 PMC6218428
  28. Jacob F, Monod J. 1961. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol. 3: 318– 356 13718526
  29. Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28(1): 27– 30. PMC102409 10592173
  30. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4): 772– 780. 23329690 PMC3603318
  31. Kim P-J, Price ND. 2011. Genetic co-occurrence network across sequenced microbes. PLoS Comput Biol. 7(12): e1002340. 22219725 PMC3248385
  32. Klockgether J, Munder A, Neugebauer J, Davenport CF, Stanke F, Larbig KD, Heeb S, Schöck U, Pohl TM, Wiehlmann L, et al 2010. Genome diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 laboratory strains. J Bacteriol. 192(4): 1113– 1121. 20023018 PMC2812968
  33. Kung VL, Ozer EA, Hauser AR. 2010. The accessory genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 74(4): 621– 641. 21119020 PMC3008168
  34. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9(4): 357– 359. 22388286 PMC3322381
  35. Luque-Almagro VM, Huertas M-J, Sáez LP, Luque-Romero MM, Moreno-Vivián C, Castillo F, Roldán MD, Blasco R, 2008. Characterization of the Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes CECT5344 cyanase, an enzyme that is not essential for cyanide assimilation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74(20): 6280– 6288. 18708510 PMC2570302
  36. McInerney JO, McNally A, O’Connell MJ. 2017a. Reply to ‘The population genetics of pangenomes’. Nat Microbiol. 2(12): 1575. 29176701
  37. McInerney JO, McNally A, O’Connell MJ. 2017b. Why prokaryotes have pangenomes. Nat Microbiol. 2(4): 17040. 28350002
  38. McInerney JO, Whelan FJ, Domingo-Sananes MR, McNally A, O’Connell MJ. 2020. Pangenomes and selection: the public goods hypothesis. In: Tettelin H, Medini D, editors. The pangenome: diversity, dynamics and evolution of genomes. Cham: Springer. p.151–167. 32633920
  39. Michael EL. 1920. Marine ecology and the coefficient of association: a plea in behalf of quantitative biology. J Ecol. 8(1): 54.
  40. Mosquera-Rendón J, Rada-Bravo AM, Cárdenas-Brito S, Corredor M, Restrepo-Pineda E, Benítez-Páez A. 2016. Pangenome-wide and molecular evolution analyses of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa species. BMC Genomics. 17(1):45. PMC4710005 26754847
  41. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 32(1): 268– 274. 25371430 PMC4271533
  42. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31(22): 3691– 3693. 26198102 PMC4817141
  43. Pensar J, Puranen S, Arnold B, MacAlasdair N, Kuronen J, Tonkin-Hill G, Pesonen M, Xu Y, Sipola A, Sánchez-Busó L, et al 2019. Genome-wide epistasis and co-selection study using mutual information. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(18): e112. 31361894 PMC6765119
  44. Press MO, Queitsch C, Borenstein E. 2016. Evolutionary assembly patterns of prokaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 26(6): 826– 833. 27197212 PMC4889971
  45. Rodríguez-Martínez J-M, Poirel L, Nordmann P, 2009. Extended-spectrum cephalosporinases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 53(5): 1766– 1771. 19258272 PMC2681535
  46. Rousset F, Cabezas-Caballero J, Piastra-Facon F, Fernández-Rodríguez J, Clermont O, Denamur E, Rocha EP, Bikard D. 2021. The impact of genetic diversity on gene essentiality within the Escherichia coli species. Nat Microbiol. 6: 301– 312. 33462433
  47. Shapiro BJ. 2017. The population genetics of pangenomes. Nat Microbiol. 2(12): 1574. 29176697
  48. Stanier RY, Palleroni NJ, Doudoroff M. 1966. The aerobic pseudomonads: a taxonomic study. J Gen Microbiol. 5963505
  49. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Doncheva NT, Morris JH, Bork P, et al 2019. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(D1): D607– D613. 30476243 PMC6323986
  50. Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Donati C, Medini D, Ward NL, Angiuoli SV, Crabtree J, Jones AL, Durkin AS, et al 2005. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial “pan-genome”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(39): 13950– 13955. 16172379 PMC1216834
  51. Udaondo Z, Molina L, Segura A, Duque E, Ramos JL. 2016. Analysis of the core genome and pangenome of Pseudomonas putida. Environ Microbiol. 18(10): 3268– 3283. 26261031
  52. Whelan FJ, Rusilowicz M, McInerney JO. 2020. Coinfinder: detecting significant associations and dissociations in pangenomes. Microb Genom. 6(3):e000338. PMC7200068 32100706
  53. Winsor GL, Griffiths EJ, Lo R, Dhillon BK, Shay JA, Brinkman F. 2016. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 44(D1): D646– D653. 26578582 PMC4702867
  54. Wozniak RA, Waldor MK. 2010. Integrative and conjugative elements: mosaic mobile genetic elements enabling dynamic lateral gene flow. Nat Rev Microbiol. 8(8): 552– 563. 20601965
  55. Wu H, Wang D, Gao F. 2021. Toward a high-quality pan-genome landscape of Bacillus subtilis by removal of confounding strains. Brief Bioinform. 22(2): 1951– 1971. 32065216
  56. Zhang Y, Zhou CM, Pu Q, Wu Q, Tan S, Shao X, Zhang W, Xie Y, Li R, Yu XJ, et al 2019. Pseudomonas aeruginosa regulatory protein AnvM controls pathogenicity in anaerobic environments and impacts host defense. mBio. 10(4): e01362– 19. 31337721 PMC6650552

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whelan, F. J., Hall, R. J., & McInerney, J. O.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
McInerney, James O
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2021-05-08
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
3697-3708
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W3159742497
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (793818)
  • BBSRC (BB/N018044/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
pan-genome, accessory genome, Pseudomonas, gene co-occurrence, selection, genetic interactions
MeSH terms
Phylogeny, Prokaryotic Cells, Genome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review