A General Substitution Matrix for Structural Phylogenetics
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Sequence-based maximum likelihood phylogenetics is a widely used method for inferring evolutionary relationships, which has illuminated the evolutionary histories of proteins and the organisms that harbor them. However, modern implementations with sophisticated models of sequence evolution struggle to resolve deep evolutionary relationships, which can be obscured by excessive sequence divergence and substitution saturation. Structural phylogenetics has emerged as a promising alternative because protein structure evolves much more slowly than protein sequences. Recent developments in protein structure prediction using AI have made it possible to predict protein structures for entire protein families and then to translate these structures into a sequence representation—the 3Di structural alphabet—that can in theory be directly fed into existing sequence-based phylogenetic software. To unlock the full potential of this idea, however, requires the inference of a general substitution matrix for structural phylogenetics, which has so far been missing. Here, we infer this matrix from large datasets of protein structures and show that it results in a better fit to empirical datasets than previous approaches. We then use this matrix to re-visit the question of the root of the tree of life. Using structural phylogenies of universal paralogs, we provide the first unambiguous evidence for a root between archaea and bacteria. Finally, we discuss some practical and conceptual limitations of structural phylogenetics. Our 3Di substitution matrix provides a starting point for revisiting many deep phylogenetic problems that have so far been extremely difficult to solve.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
Varadi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough
Philippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Lavrov, D. V., Littlewood, D. T. J., Manuel, M., Wörheide, G., & Baurain, D. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000602 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S., & Miyata, T. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.23.9355 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Hohmann-Marriott, M. F., & Blankenship, R. E. (2011) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103811 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
The Rooting of the Universal Tree of Life Is Not Reliable
Philippe, H., & Forterre, P. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006573 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
ATP synthase evolution on a cross-braced dated tree of life
Mahendrarajah, T. A., Moody, E. R. R., Schrempf, D., Szánthó, L. L., Dombrowski, N., Davín, A. A., Pisani, D., Donoghue, P. C. J., Szöllősi, G. J., Williams, T. A., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42924-w · Cited by 86 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This is because the AF matrix is much less affected by the misprediction issues than the LLM (which we discuss further below).”
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Garg, S. G., & Hochberg, G. K. A.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology (DE)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Garg, Sriram G
- Hochberg, Georg K A
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-06
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- PMC
- PMC12198762
- OpenAlex
- W4411095222
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 14
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Human Frontiers Science Program (RGP0028)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- substitution matrices, protein structure, deep phylogenetic relationships, protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Archaea, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review