The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common Pattern of Evolution of Gene Expression Level and Protein Sequence in Drosophila
Abstract
Sequence divergence scaled by variation within species has been used to infer the action of selection upon individual genes. Applying this approach to expression, we compared whole-genome whole-body RNA levels in 10 heterozygous Drosophila simulans genotypes and a pooled sample of 10 D. melanogaster lines using Affymetrix Genechip. For 972 genes expressed in D. melanogaster, the transcript level was below detection threshold in D. simulans, which may be explained either by sequence divergence between the primers on the chip and the mRNA transcripts or by down-regulation of these genes. Out of 6,707 genes that were expressed in both species, transcript level was significantly different between species for 534 genes (at P < 0.001). Genes whose expression is under stabilizing selection should exhibit reduced genetic variation within species and reduced divergence between species. Expression of genes under directional selection in D. simulans should be highly divergent from D. melanogaster, while showing low genetic variation in D. simulans. Finally, the genes with large variation within species but modest divergence between species are candidates for balancing selection. Rapidly diverging, low-polymorphism genes included those involved in reproduction (e.g., Mst 3Ba, 98Cb; Acps 26Aa, 63F; and sperm-specific dynein). Genes with high variation in transcript abundance within species included metallothionein and hairless, both hypothesized to be segregating in nature because of gene-by-environment interactions. Further, we compared expression divergence and DNA substitution rate in 195 genes. Synonymous substitution rate and expression divergences were uncorrelated, whereas there was a significant positive correlation between nonsynonymous substitution rate and expression divergence. We hypothesize that as a substantial fraction of nonsynonymous divergence has been shown to be adaptive, much of the observed expression divergence is likewise adaptive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Genome Sequence of Drosophila melanogaster
Adams, M. D., Celniker, S. E., Holt, R. A., Evans, C. A., Gocayne, J. D., Amanatides, P. G., Scherer, S. E., Li, P. W., Hoskins, R. A., Galle, R. F., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 · Cited by 5,929
Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila
McDonald, J. H., & Kreitman, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351652a0 · Cited by 3,283
A Test of Neutral Molecular Evolution Based on Nucleotide Data
Hudson, R. R., Kreitman, M., & Aguadé, M. (1987) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/116.1.153 · Cited by 1,767
Hedrick, P. W. (1983) · Cited by 1,580
Understanding quantitative genetic variation
Barton, N. H., & Keightley, P. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg700 · Cited by 835
Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations
Oleksiak, M. F., Churchill, G. A., & Crawford, D. L. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng983 · Cited by 736
Genome-wide analysis of the Drosophila immune response by using oligonucleotide microarrays
De Gregorio, E., Spellman, P. T., Rubin, G. M., & Lemaitre, B. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.221458698 · Cited by 691
Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories
True, J. R., & Haag, E. S. (2001) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003002109.x · Cited by 678
Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila
Smith, N. G. C., & Eyre-Walker, A. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4151022a · Cited by 666
The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster
Jin, W., Riley, R. M., Wolfinger, R. D., White, K. P., Passador-Gurgel, G., & Gibson, G. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng766 · Cited by 643
Cited by
Regulatory divergence in Drosophila revealed by mRNA-seq
McManus, C. J., Coolon, J. D., Duff, M. O., Eipper-Mains, J., Graveley, B. R., & Wittkopp, P. J. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.102491.109 · Cited by 381
Evolution of primate gene expression
Khaitovich, P., Enard, W., Lachmann, M., & Pääbo, S. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1940 · Cited by 341
Graze, R. M., McIntyre, L. M., Main, B. J., Wayne, M. L., & Nuzhdin, S. V. (2009) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.105957 · Cited by 100
Self-citationMucaki, E. J., Shirley, B. C., & Rogan, P. K. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00109 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Nuzhdin, S. V., Wayne, M. L., Harmon, K. L., & McIntyre, L. M.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1308-1317
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2110225946
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common Pattern of Evolution of Gene Expression Level and Protein Sequence in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msh128
- The paper
- Nuzhdin, S. V., Wayne, M. L., Harmon, K. L., & McIntyre, L. M. (2004). Common Pattern of Evolution of Gene Expression Level and Protein Sequence in Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.