The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explorative Genome Scan to Detect Candidate Loci for Adaptation Along a Gradient of Altitude in the Common Frog (Rana temporaria)
Open accessAbstract
Today, with the rapid development of population genomics, the genetic basis of adaptation can be unraveled directly at the genome level, without any prerequisites about the selectively advantageous genes or traits. For nonmodel species, it is now possible to screen many markers randomly scattered across the genome and to distinguish between the neutral genetic background and outlier loci displaying an atypical behavior (e.g., a higher differentiation between populations). This study investigated the genetic frame of adaptation to a gradient of altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria) by means of a genome scan based on 392 amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Using two outlier detection methods never applied to dominant data so far, we sought for loci with a genetic differentiation diverging from neutral expectations when comparing populations from different altitudes. All the detected loci were sorted out according to their most probable cause for outlier behavior and classified as false positives, outliers due to local effects, or outliers associated with altitude. Altogether, eight good candidate loci were identified as potentially involved in adaptation to altitude because they were picked out in several independent interaltitude comparisons. This result illustrated the potential of genome-wide surveys to reveal selection signatures along selection gradients, where the association between environmental variables and fitness-related traits may be complex and/or cryptic. In this article, we also underlined the need for confirmation of the selection footprints for the outlier loci. Finally, we provided some preliminary insights into the genetic basis of adaptation along an altitudinal cline in the common frog.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T. V. D., Hornes, M., Friters, A., Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., et al. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · Cited by 12,401
THE GENETICAL STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONS
WRIGHT, S. (1949) · Annals of Eugenics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x · Cited by 6,753
ROGERS, S. M., & BERNATCHEZ, L. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02396.x · Cited by 5,088
PHYLIP ( PHYLogeny Inference Package)
Cummings, M. P. (2004) · Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1002/9780471650126.dob0534.pub2 · Cited by 3,127
GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION, SPECIATION, AND CLINES
Hedrick, P. W. (1978) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1978.tb04617.x · Cited by 2,395
PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package)
Cummings, M. P. (2004) · Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1002/0471650129.dob0534 · Cited by 1,967
Molecular Signatures of Natural Selection
Nielsen, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420 · Cited by 1,641
Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure.
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0237 · Cited by 1,535
How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies
BONIN, A., BELLEMAIN, E., BRONKEN EIDESEN, P., POMPANON, F., BROCHMANN, C., & TABERLET, P. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02346.x · Cited by 1,416
Self-citationThe power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing
Luikart, G., England, P. R., Tallmon, D., Jordan, S., & Taberlet, P. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1226 · Cited by 1,365
Cited by
Phylogeography’s past, present, and future: 10 years after Avise, 2000
Hickerson, M. J., Carstens, B. C., Cavender-Bares, J., Crandall, K. A., Graham, C. H., Johnson, J. B., Rissler, L., Victoriano, P. F., & Yoder, A. D. (2010) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.016 · Cited by 666
Stinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
Almost Forgotten or Latest Practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances
Meudt, H. M., & Clarke, A. C. (2007) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.02.001 · Cited by 615
Nosil, P., Egan, S. P., & Funk, D. J. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00299.x · Cited by 600
Orsini, L., Vanoverbeke, J., Swillen, I., Mergeay, J., & De Meester, L. (2013) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12561 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonin, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 773-783
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W1976495940
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explorative Genome Scan to Detect Candidate Loci for Adaptation Along a Gradient of Altitude in the Common Frog (Rana temporaria). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msj087
- The paper
- Bonin, A. (2006). Explorative Genome Scan to Detect Candidate Loci for Adaptation Along a Gradient of Altitude in the Common Frog (Rana temporaria). Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.