Cited by 283Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

Early Penguin Fossils, Plus Mitochondrial Genomes, Calibrate Avian Evolution

Open access
Slack, Kerryn E., Jones, Craig M., Ando, Tatsuro, Harrison, G. L.(Abby), Fordyce, R. Ewan, Arnason, Ulfur, Penny, David·2006·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Testing models of macroevolution, and especially the sufficiency of microevolutionary processes, requires good collaboration between molecular biologists and paleontologists. We report such a test for events around the Late Cretaceous by describing the earliest penguin fossils, analyzing complete mitochondrial genomes from an albatross, a petrel, and a loon, and describe the gradual decline of pterosaurs at the same time modern birds radiate. The penguin fossils comprise four naturally associated skeletons from the New Zealand Waipara Greensand, a Paleocene (early Tertiary) formation just above a well-known Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary site. The fossils, in a new genus (Waimanu), provide a lower estimate of 61-62 Ma for the divergence between penguins and other birds and thus establish a reliable calibration point for avian evolution. Combining fossil calibration points, DNA sequences, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analysis, the penguin calibrations imply a radiation of modern (crown group) birds in the Late Cretaceous. This includes a conservative estimate that modern sea and shorebird lineages diverged at least by the Late Cretaceous about 74 +/- 3 Ma (Campanian). It is clear that modern birds from at least the latest Cretaceous lived at the same time as archaic birds including Hesperornis, Ichthyornis, and the diverse Enantiornithiformes. Pterosaurs, which also coexisted with early crown birds, show notable changes through the Late Cretaceous. There was a decrease in taxonomic diversity, and small- to medium-sized species disappeared well before the end of the Cretaceous. A simple reading of the fossil record might suggest competitive interactions with birds, but much more needs to be understood about pterosaur life histories. Additional fossils and molecular data are still required to help understand the role of biotic interactions in the evolution of Late Cretaceous birds and thus to test that the mechanisms of microevolution are sufficient to explain macroevolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msj124

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fossil evidence indicates that Sphenisciformes, Coliiformes, Musophagiformes, and Accipitrifomes had begun to acquire key phenotypic differences during the interval around 60 Mya.

    “Fossil evidence indicates that these clades had begun to acquire key phenotypic differences during this interval (26, 27).”
  • The earliest crown bird specimens are known from primarily postcranial remains or highly deformed specimens, hindering estimation of the cranial phenotype for the ancestral neornithine.

    “However, these specimens are known from primarily postcranial remains or highly deformed specimens, hindering estimation of the cranial phenotype for the ancestral neornithine.”
  • The earliest crown bird fossils include representatives of Galloanserae, total-clade Sphenisciformes, and total-clade Coliiformes.

    “The earliest crown bird fossils include representatives of Galloanserae (33), total-clade Sphenisciformes (26), and total-clade Coliiformes (27).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slack, K. E., Jones, C. M., Ando, T., Harrison, G. L. (., Fordyce, R. E., Arnason, U., & Penny, D.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • GNS Science (NZ)
Corresponding author
Slack, Kerryn E.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2006-03-13
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1144-1155
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2162762023
Cited by
283
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Marsden Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
avian evolution, molecular clock calibration, mitochondrial genome, albatrosses, petrels, loons, Late Cretaceous, Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, Hesperornis, Ichthyornis, macroevolution, microevolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, DNA, Mitochondrial, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Phylogeny, Spheniscidae, Genes, Mitochondrial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review