Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grinding up Wheat: A Massive Loss of Nucleotide Diversity Since Domestication

Open access
Haudry, A, Cenci, A, Ravel, C, Bataillon, T, Brunel, D, Poncet, C, Hochu, I, Poirier, S, Santoni, S, Glémin, S, David, J·2007·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Several demographic and selective events occurred during the domestication of wheat from the allotetraploid wild emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides). Cultivated wheat has since been affected by other historical events. We analyzed nucleotide diversity at 21 loci in a sample of 101 individuals representing 4 taxa corresponding to representative steps in the recent evolution of wheat (wild, domesticated, cultivated durum, and bread wheats) to unravel the evolutionary history of cultivated wheats and to quantify its impact on genetic diversity. Sequence relationships are consistent with a single domestication event and identify 2 genetically different groups of bread wheat. The wild group is not highly polymorphic, with only 212 polymorphic sites among the 21,720 bp sequenced, and, during domestication, diversity was further reduced in cultivated forms--by 69% in bread wheat and 84% in durum wheat--with considerable differences between loci, some retaining no polymorphism at all. Coalescent simulations were performed and compared with our data to estimate the intensity of the bottlenecks associated with domestication and subsequent selection. Based on our 21-locus analysis, the average intensity of domestication bottleneck was estimated at about 3--giving a population size for the domesticated form about one third that of wild dicoccoides. The most severe bottleneck, with an intensity of about 6, occurred in the evolution of durum wheat. We investigated whether some of the genes departed from the empirical distribution of most loci, suggesting that they might have been selected during domestication or breeding. We detected a departure from the null model of demographic bottleneck for the hypothetical gene HgA. However, the atypical pattern of polymorphism at this locus might reveal selection on the linked locus Gsp1A, which may affect grain softness--an important trait for end-use quality in wheat.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msm077

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bar-Yosef, 1998, The Natufian culture in the Levant, threshold to the origins of agriculture, Evol Anthropol, 6, 159, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5<159::AID-EVAN4>3.0.CO;2-7 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1998)6:5<159::aid-evan4>3.0.co;2-7
  2. Caldwell, 2004, Sequence polymorphism in polyploid wheat and their d-genome diploid ancestor, Genetics, 167, 941, 10.1534/genetics.103.016303 · doi:10.1534/genetics.103.016303
  3. David, 2003, Impact of demographic and selective events on the current genetic diversity of the Triticum turgidum complex, 7
  4. Dvorak, 1998, The structure of the Aegilops tauschii genepool and the evolution of hexaploid wheat, Theor Appl Genet, 97, 657, 10.1007/s001220050942 · doi:10.1007/s001220050942
  5. Dvorak, 1990, Variation in repeated nucleotide sequences sheds light on the phylogeny of the wheat B and G genomes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 87, 9640, 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9640 · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.24.9640
  6. Giles, 2006, GluDy allele variations in Aegilops tauschii and Triticum aestivum: implications for the origins of hexaploid wheats, Theor Appl Genet, 112, 1563, 10.1007/s00122-006-0259-5 · doi:10.1007/s00122-006-0259-5
  7. Isidore, 2005, Ancient haplotypes resulting from extensive molecular rearrangements in the wheat A genome have been maintained in species of three different ploidy levels, Genome Res, 15, 526, 10.1101/gr.3131005 · doi:10.1101/gr.3131005
  8. Khlestkina, 2001, Genome-specific markers of tetraploid wheats and their putative diploid progenitor species, Plant Breed, 120, 227, 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2001.00600.x · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2001.00600.x
  9. Kihara, 1944, Discovery of the DD-analyser, one of the ancestors of Triticum vulgare, Agric Hortic (Tokyo), 19, 13
  10. Kimura, 1971, Theoretical topics in population genetics
  11. Mori, 1995, Wheat Phylogeny Determined by Rflp Analysis of Nuclear-DNA. 2. Wild Tetraploid Wheats, Theor Appl Genet, 90, 129, 10.1007/BF00221006 · doi:10.1007/bf00221006
  12. Mori, 2003, Wheat domestication: when, where and how?, Plant Cell Physiol, 44, S2
  13. Morris, 2002, Puroindolines: the molecular genetic basis of wheat grain hardness, Plant Mol Biol, 48, 633, 10.1023/A:1014837431178 · doi:10.1023/a:1014837431178
  14. Nesbitt, 1996, From staple crop extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheats, 41
  15. Ravel, 2006, Single-nucleotide polymorphism frequency in a set of selected lines of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L), Genome, 49, 1131, 10.1139/g06-067 · doi:10.1139/g06-067
  16. Sasanuma, 2002, Genetic diversity of wheat wild relatives in the near east detected by AFLP, Euphytica, 127, 81, 10.1023/A:1019941817057 · doi:10.1023/a:1019941817057
  17. Septiningsih, 2003, Identification of quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in an advanced backcross population derived from the Oryza sativa variety IR64 and the wild relative O-rufipogon, Theor Appl Genet, 107, 1419, 10.1007/s00122-003-1373-2 · doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1373-2
  18. Staden, 2001, Sequence assembly and finishing methods, Methods Biochem Anal, 43, 303, 10.1002/0471223921.ch13 · doi:10.1002/0471223921.ch13
  19. Zohary, 1999, Monophyletic vs. polyphyletic origin of the crops on which agriculture was founded in the near east, Genet Resour Crop Evol, 46, 133, 10.1023/A:1008692912820 · doi:10.1023/a:1008692912820

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Haudry, A., Cenci, A., Ravel, C., Bataillon, T., Brunel, D., Poncet, C., Hochu, I., Poirier, S., Santoni, S., Glémin, S., & David, J.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2007-04-18
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1506-1517
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2103493690
Cited by
405
References
56
FWCI
16.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grinding up Wheat: A Massive Loss of Nucleotide Diversity Since Domestication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msm077
The paper
Haudry, A., Cenci, A., Ravel, C., Bataillon, T., Brunel, D., Poncet, C., Hochu, I., Poirier, S., Santoni, S., Glémin, S., & David, J. (2007). Grinding up Wheat: A Massive Loss of Nucleotide Diversity Since Domestication. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm077

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.