CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Origin of Primate Orphan Genes: A Comparative Genomics Approach

Toll-Riera, M., Bosch, N., Bellora, N., Castelo, R., Armengol, L., Estivill, X., Mar Alba, M.·2008·Molecular Biology and Evolution
DOI 10.1093/molbev/msn281
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msn281

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New genes tend to be shorter, evolve faster, and have lower expression than well-established genes.

    “Given that new genes tend to be shorter, evolve faster, and have lower expression than well-established genes (Toll-Riera et al. 2009, Zhao et al. 2024), some of the surplus short genes inferred in ab initio could potentially be true lineage-specific genes.”

    From Annotation matters: the effect of structural gene annotation on orthology inference (2025) · cites this paper as Toll-Riera et al. 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 2005, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 22, 598, 10.1093/molbev/msi045 · DOI
  2. Alba, 2007, BMC evolutionary biology [electronic resource], 7, 53, 10.1186/1471-2148-7-53 · DOI
  3. Altschul, 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 3389, 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bai, 2007, Genome biology, 8, R11, 10.1186/gb-2007-8-1-r11 · DOI
  5. Bairoch, 2005, Nucleic Acids Research, 33, D154, 10.1093/nar/gni148 · DOI
  6. 2006, Genetics, 172, 1675, 10.1534/genetics.105.050336 · DOI
  7. 2007, Bioinformatics, 23, 243, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl568 · DOI
  8. Bellora, 2007, BMC genomics [electronic resource], 8, 459, 10.1186/1471-2164-8-459 · DOI
  9. 2007, Nature; Physical Science (London), 447, 799, 10.1038/nature05874 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cai, 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 63, 1, 10.1007/s00239-004-0372-5 · DOI
  11. Cai, 2008, Genetics, 179, 487, 10.1534/genetics.107.084491 · DOI
  12. Castresana, 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 59, 72, 10.1007/s00239-004-2605-z · DOI
  13. 2006, PNAS, 103, 14056, 10.1073/pnas.0606239103 · DOI
  14. 2007, PNAS, 104, 19428, 10.1073/pnas.0709013104 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Corvelo, 2008, Genome biology, 9, R141, 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r141 · DOI
  16. Daubin, 2004, Genome Research, 14, 1036, 10.1101/gr.2231904 · DOI
  17. Digweed, 1995, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 15, 305, 10.1128/MCB.15.1.305 · DOI
  18. Dolstra, 1999, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 189, 301, 10.1084/jem.189.2.301 · DOI
  19. Domazet-Loso, 2003, Genome Research, 13, 2213, 10.1101/gr.1311003 · DOI
  20. Domazet-Loso, 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG, 23, 533, 10.1016/j.tig.2007.08.014 · DOI
  21. Eichler, 1998, Genome Research, 8, 791, 10.1101/gr.8.8.791 · DOI
  22. Fischer, 1999, Bioinformatics, 15, 759, 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.9.759 · DOI
  23. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, D707, 10.1093/nar/gkm988 · DOI
  24. Fortna, 2004, PLoS biology, 2, E207, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020207 · DOI
  25. Frith, 2006, 2, e52, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020052 · DOI
  26. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, 2012, 10.1093/nar/gkn024 · DOI
  27. Gerber, 1997, RNA, 3, 453
  28. 2005, Genome Research, 15, 1451, 10.1101/gr.4086505 · DOI
  29. Goldovsky, 2005, Bioinformatics, 21, 3806, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti579 · DOI
  30. Johnson, 2001, Nature; Physical Science (London), 413, 514, 10.1038/35097067 · DOI
  31. 2007, Science, 316, 1484, 10.1126/science.1138341 · DOI
  32. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, D773, 10.1093/nar/gkm966 · DOI
  33. 2007, Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D55, 10.1093/nar/gkl851 · DOI
  34. 2004, PNAS, 101, 3077, 10.1073/pnas.0308532100 · DOI
  35. 2005, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 22, 1702, 10.1093/molbev/msi164 · DOI
  36. 2006, PNAS, 103, 9935, 10.1073/pnas.0509809103 · DOI
  37. Lin, 2000, Cancer Research, 60, 858
  38. 2006, GENOME INFORM, 17, 240
  39. Ostrin, 2008, Experimental eye research, 86, 457, 10.1016/j.exer.2007.01.025 · DOI
  40. Maka owski, 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG, 10, 188, 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90254-2 · DOI
  41. Martinez-Garay, 2002, Genomics, 80, 259, 10.1006/geno.2002.6834 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Matys, 2006, Nucleic Acids Research, 34, D108, 10.1093/nar/gkj143 · DOI
  43. Mularoni, 2007, Genomics, 89, 316, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.11.011 · DOI
  44. Nekrutenko, 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG, 17, 619, 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02445-3 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Notredame, 2000, Journal of molecular biology, 302, 205, 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 · DOI
  46. Ohno, 1984, PNAS, 81, 2421, 10.1073/pnas.81.8.2421 · DOI
  47. Okamura, 2006, Genomics, 88, 690, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.06.009 · DOI
  48. 2007, Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D178, 10.1093/nar/gkl926 · DOI
  49. Pibouin, 2002, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics, 133, 55, 10.1016/S0165-4608(01)00634-3 · DOI
  50. 2003, PNAS, 100, 10931, 10.1073/pnas.1932980100 · DOI
  51. Siew, 2003, Proteins, 53, 241, 10.1002/prot.10423 · DOI
  52. 2007, RNA, 13, 1603, 10.1261/rna.682507 · DOI
  53. Thompson, 1994, Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673, 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 2006, PNAS, 103, 3220, 10.1073/pnas.0511307103 · DOI
  55. Vlieghe, 2006, Nucleic Acids Research, 34, D95, 10.1093/nar/gkj115 · DOI
  56. Wootton, 1996, Methods in enzymology, 266, 554, 10.1016/S0076-6879(96)66035-2 · DOI
  57. Xin, 2000, Journal of Biochemistry, 128, 847, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022823 · DOI
  58. 2007, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1586, 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 2002, International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, 99, 361, 10.1002/ijc.10371 · DOI
  60. Zhang, 2007, BMC genomics [electronic resource], 8, 93, 10.1186/1471-2164-8-93 · DOI
  61. 2008, Genome Research, 18, 1446, 10.1101/gr.076588.108 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Toll-Riera, M., Bosch, N., Bellora, N., Castelo, R., Armengol, L., Estivill, X., & Mar Alba, M.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2008-12-23
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
603-612
ISSN
  • 0737-4038
  • 1537-1719
DOI
10.1093/molbev/msn281
Cited by
218
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review