Cited by 137Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Variation in the Ratio of Nucleotide Substitution and Indel Rates across Genomes in Mammals and Bacteria

Open access
Chen, J.-Q., Wu, Y., Yang, H., Bergelson, J., Kreitman, M., Tian, D.·2009·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Rates of nucleotide substitution and insertion/deletion (indel) are known to vary across the functional components of a genome. Little attention has been paid, however, to the quantitative relationship between the two. Here we investigate the ratio of nucleotide substitutions to indels (S/I) in different regions of 4 primates, 70 bacteria, and 8 other genomes. We find that the ratio differs at 5.4-times between coding and noncoding, 3.3-times between conserved and less conserved coding sequences, and 1.46-times between nonrepeat and repeat regions. The S/I ratio is also positively correlated with the level of divergence between the genomes compared. Our results suggest that the S/I ratio may reflect differences in the efficacy of selection against indels. Due to the sensitivity of indel density in different regions, this ratio varies over a much larger range. With the recent discovery suggesting that indels act as local enhancers of mutation in surrounding sequences, nucleotide substitution rates are expected to be accelerated in regions of low constraint, where indels tend to accumulate, but will otherwise be modulated in proportion to the level of a sequence's functional constraint. Indels, therefore, may play a nontrivial role in controlling differences in genetic variation and divergence across functional regions of a genome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msp063

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of small indels in any given branch is correlated with the rate of nucleotide substitution.

    “As expected from previous studies16,34, the rate of small indels in any given branch was correlated with the rate of nucleotide substitution (an R2 value of 0.69 for insertions and 0.80 for deletions in avians, and 0.39 and 0.40, respectively, for eutherians)”

    From Progressive Cactus is a multiple-genome aligner for the thousand-genome era (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports covariation between SNPs and indels within and between species, supporting the general correlation. The paper does not establish that this holds for small indels in any given evolutionary branch; its comparisons concern genomes and genomic regions rather than branch-specific rates. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E. 2002. Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol. 11:2453-2465.
  2. Sun X, Zhang Y, Yang S, Chen JQ, Hohn B, Tian D. 2008. Insertion DNA promotes ectopic recombination during meiosis in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol. doi: 10.1093/ molbev/msn158. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J.-Q., Wu, Y., Yang, H., Bergelson, J., Kreitman, M., & Tian, D.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (CN)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2009-03-27
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1523-1531
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2139814676
Cited by
137
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
nucleotide substitution rates, functional constraints, repetitive DNA, genomic divergence, primates, bacteria, mammalian genomes
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Genome, Human, Genome, INDEL Mutation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review