The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of Invertebrate Gene Body Methylation
Abstract
DNA methylation of transcription units (gene bodies) occurs in the genomes of many animal and plant species. Phylogenetic persistence of gene body methylation implies biological significance; yet, the functional roles of gene body methylation remain elusive. In this study, we analyzed methylation levels of orthologs from four distantly related invertebrate species, including the honeybee, silkworm, sea squirt, and sea anemone. We demonstrate that in all four species, gene bodies distinctively cluster to two groups, which correspond to high and low methylation levels. This pattern resembles that of sequence composition arising from the mutagenetic effect of DNA methylation. In spite of this effect, our results show that protein sequences of genes targeted by high levels of methylation are conserved relative to genes lacking methylation. Our investigation identified many genes that either gained or lost methylation during the course of invertebrate evolution. Most of these genes appear to have lost methylation in the insect lineages we investigated, particularly in the honeybee. We found that genes that are methylated in all four invertebrate taxa are enriched for housekeeping functions related to transcription and translation, whereas the loss of DNA methylation occurred in genes whose functions include cellular signaling and reproductive processes. Overall, our study helps to illuminate the functional significance of gene body methylation and its impacts on genome evolution in diverse invertebrate taxa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics
Suzuki, M. M., & Bird, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2341 · Cited by 3,039
Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters
Maunakea, A. K., Nagarajan, R. P., Bilenky, M., Ballinger, T. J., D’Souza, C., Fouse, S. D., Johnson, B. E., Hong, C., Nielsen, C., Zhao, Y., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09165 · Cited by 1,743
Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals
Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P.-Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S. H., Halpern, M. E., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002720107 · Cited by 1,285
Mutagenic deamination of cytosine residues in DNA
Duncan, B. K., & Miller, J. H. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/287560a0 · Cited by 792
The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils?
Douzery, E. J. P., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Delsuc, F., & Philippe, H. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403984101 · Cited by 638
Cited by
DNA methylation in social insects: how epigenetics can control behavior and longevity
Yan, H., Bonasio, R., Simola, D. F., Liebig, J., Berger, S. L., & Reinberg, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020803 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarda, S., Zeng, J., Hunt, B. G., & Yi, S. V.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-02-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1907-1916
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2103704928
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Invertebrate Gene Body Methylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/mss062
- The paper
- Sarda, S., Zeng, J., Hunt, B. G., & Yi, S. V. (2012). The Evolution of Invertebrate Gene Body Methylation. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.