The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Rate Heterogeneity among Sites on the Time Dependence of Molecular Rates
Open accessAbstract
Molecular evolutionary rate estimates have been shown to depend on the time period over which they are estimated. Factors such as demographic processes, calibration errors, purifying selection, and the heterogeneity of substitution rates among sites (RHAS) are known to affect the accuracy with which rates of evolution are estimated. We use mathematical modeling and Bayesian analyses of simulated sequence alignments to explore how mutational hotspots can lead to time-dependent rate estimates. Mathematical modeling shows that underestimation of molecular rates over increasing time scales is inevitable when RHAS is ignored. Although a gamma distribution is commonly used to model RHAS, we show that when the actual RHAS deviates from a gamma-like distribution, rates can either be under- or overestimated in a time-dependent manner. Simulations performed under different scenarios of RHAS confirm the mathematical modeling and demonstrate the impacts of time-dependent rates on estimates of divergence times. Most notably, erroneous rate estimates can have narrow credibility intervals, leading to false confidence in biased estimates of rates, and node ages. Surprisingly, large errors in estimates of overall molecular rate do not necessarily generate large errors in divergence time estimates. Finally, we illustrate the correlation between time-dependent rate patterns and differential saturation between quickly and slowly evolving sites. Our results suggest that data partitioning or simple nonparametric mixture models of RHAS significantly improve the accuracy with which node ages and substitution rates can be estimated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463 · cited 2×
“Considerable methodological improvements have also been made, such as the implementation of more biologically realistic yet computationally tractable models that accommodate changes in substitution rates along lineages, also known as “relaxed clocks” (e.g., Thorne et al. 1998; Huelsenbeck et al. 2000; Drummond et al.…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationYang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00160154 · Cited by 2,960
Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., & Painter, I. S. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025892 · Cited by 1,317 · cited 2×
“…improvements have also been made, such as the implementation of more biologically realistic yet computationally tractable models that accommodate changes in substitution rates along lineages, also known as “relaxed clocks” (e.g., Thorne et al. 1998; Huelsenbeck et al. 2000; Drummond et al. 2006).”
BackgroundPhylogenomics: The beginning of incongruence?
JEFFROY, O., BRINKMANN, H., DELSUC, F., & PHILIPPE, H. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.02.003 · Cited by 698
Rapid, global demographic expansions after the origins of agriculture
Gignoux, C. R., Henn, B. M., & Mountain, J. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914274108 · Cited by 267
Cited by
ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A., & Jermiin, L. S. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4285 · Cited by 18,449
ModelTest-NG: A New and Scalable Tool for the Selection of DNA and Protein Evolutionary Models
Darriba, D., Posada, D., Kozlov, A. M., Stamatakis, A., Morel, B., & Flouri, T. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz189 · Cited by 2,105
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545
Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea
Zhu, Q., Mai, U., Pfeiffer, W., Janssen, S., Asnicar, F., Sanders, J. G., Belda-Ferre, P., Al-Ghalith, G. A., Kopylova, E., McDonald, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13443-4 · Cited by 355
Burki, F., Kaplan, M., Tikhonenkov, D. V., Zlatogursky, V., Minh, B. Q., Radaykina, L. V., Smirnov, A., Mylnikov, A. P., & Keeling, P. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2802 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Soubrier, J., Steel, M., Lee, M. S. Y., Der Sarkissian, C., Guindon, S., Ho, S. Y. W., & Cooper, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-07-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3345-3358
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W1968783265
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Rate Heterogeneity among Sites on the Time Dependence of Molecular Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/mss140
- The paper
- Soubrier, J., Steel, M., Lee, M. S. Y., Der Sarkissian, C., Guindon, S., Ho, S. Y. W., & Cooper, A. (2012). The Influence of Rate Heterogeneity among Sites on the Time Dependence of Molecular Rates. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.