Cited by 46RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Coevolution between Stop Codon Usage and Release Factors in Bacterial Species

Open access
Wei, Yulong, Wang, Juan, Xia, Xuhua·2016·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Three stop codons in bacteria represent different translation termination signals, and their usage is expected to depend on their differences in translation termination efficiency, mutation bias, and relative abundance of release factors (RF1 decoding UAA and UAG, and RF2 decoding UAA and UGA). In 14 bacterial species (covering Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria and Spirochetes) with cellular RF1 and RF2 quantified, UAA is consistently over-represented in highly expressed genes (HEGs) relative to lowly expressed genes (LEGs), whereas UGA usage is the opposite even in species where RF2 is far more abundant than RF1. UGA usage relative to UAG increases significantly with PRF2 [=RF2/(RF1 + RF2)] as expected from adaptation between stop codons and their decoders. PRF2 is > 0.5 over a wide range of AT content (measured by PAT3 as the proportion of AT at third codon sites), but decreases rapidly toward zero at the high range of PAT3 This explains why bacterial lineages with high PAT3 often have UGA reassigned because of low RF2. There is no indication that UAG is a minor stop codon in bacteria as claimed in a recent publication. The claim is invalid because of the failure to apply the two key criteria in identifying a minor codon: (1) it is least preferred by HEGs (or most preferred by LEGs) and (2) it corresponds to the least abundant decoder. Our results suggest a more plausible explanation for why UAA usage increases, and UGA usage decreases, with PAT3, but UAG usage remains low over the entire PAT3 range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msw107

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Highly expressed genes in diverse bacterial species strongly prefer UAA codons even in strongly GC-rich genomes with an overwhelming majority of stop codons being UGA.

    “Highly expressed genes in diverse bacterial species strongly prefer UAA codons even in strongly GC-rich genomes with an overwhelming majority of stop codons being UGA [74,75].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. Adamski FM McCaughan KK Jorgensen F Kurland CG Tate WP. 1994 The concentration of polypeptide chain release factors 1 and 2 at different growth rates of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 238: 302– 308. 8176726
  2. Akashi H. 1994 Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136: 927– 935. 8005445 PMC1205897
  3. Akashi H. 1997 Codon bias evolution in Drosophila. Population genetics of mutation-selection drift. Gene 205: 269– 278. 9461401
  4. Akashi H. 2003 Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. Genetics 164: 1291– 1303. 12930740 PMC1462678
  5. Akashi H Eyre-Walker A. 1998 Translational selection and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 8: 688– 693. 9914211
  6. Andersson GE Kurland CG. 1991 An extreme codon preference strategy: codon reassignment. Mol Biol Evol. 8: 530– 544. 1921708
  7. Bjornsson A Isaksson LA. 1996 Accumulation of a mRNA decay intermediate by ribosomal pausing at a stop codon. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 1753– 1757. 8649996 PMC145836
  8. Bossi L. 1983 Context effects: translation of UAG codon by suppressor tRNA is affected by the sequence following UAG in the message. J Mol Biol. 164: 73– 87. 6188841
  9. Bossi L Ruth JR. 1980 The influence of codon context on genetic code translation. Nature 286: 123– 127. 7402305
  10. Brown CM Dalphin ME Stockwell PA Tate WP. 1993 The translational termination signal database. Nucleic Acids Res. 21: 3119– 3123. 8332534 PMC309741
  11. Carullo M Xia X. 2008 An extensive study of mutation and selection on the wobble nucleotide in tRNA anticodons in fungal mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Evol. 66: 484– 493. 18401633
  12. Cesar Sanchez J Padron G Santana H Herrera L. 1998 Elimination of an HuIFNα2b readthrough species, produced in Escherichia coli, by replacing its natural translational stop signal. J Biotechnol. 63: 179– 186. 9803532
  13. Chavancy G Chevallier A Fournier A Garel JP. 1979 Adaptation of iso-tRNA concentration to mRNA codon frequency in the eukaryote cell. Biochimie 61: 71– 78. 435560
  14. Chithambaram S Prabhakaran R Xia X. 2014a Differential codon adaptation between dsDNA and ssDNA phages in Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol. 31: 1606– 1617. 24586046 PMC4032129
  15. Chithambaram S Prabhakaran R Xia X. 2014b The effect of mutation and selection on codon adaptation in Escherichia coli bacteriophage. Genetics 197: 301– 315. 24583580 PMC4012488
  16. Craigen WJ Cook RG Tate WP Caskey CT. 1985 Bacterial peptide chain release factors: conserved primary structure and possible frameshift regulation of release factor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 82: 3616– 3620. 3889910 PMC397836
  17. Cridge AG Major LL Mahagaonkar AA Poole ES Isaksson LA Tate WP. 2006 Comparison of characteristics and function of translation termination signals between and within prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 1959– 1973. 16614446 PMC1435984
  18. Davies J Jones DS Khorana HG. 1966 A further study of misreading of codons induced by streptomycin and neomycin using ribopolynucleotides containing two nucleotides in alternating sequence as templates. J Mol Biol. 18: 48– 57. 5337558
  19. Desper R Gascuel O. 2002 Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J Comput Biol. 9: 687– 705. 12487758
  20. Desper R Gascuel O. 2004 Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting. Mol Biol Evol. 21: 587– 598. 14694080
  21. Donly BC Edgar CD Adamski FM Tate WP. 1990 Frameshift autoregulation in the gene for Escherichia coli release factor 2: partly functional mutants result in frameshift enhancement. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6517– 6522. 2251114 PMC332604
  22. Eyre-Walker A Bulmer M. 1995 Synonymous substitution rates in enterobacteria. Genetics 140: 1407– 1412. 7498779 PMC1206703
  23. Freistroffer DV Kwiatkowski M Buckingham RH Ehrenberg M. 2000 The accuracy of codon recognition by polypeptide release factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 97: 2046– 2051. 10681447 PMC15751
  24. Geller AI Rich A. 1980 A UGA termination suppression tRNATrp active in rabbit reticulocytes. Nature 283: 41– 46. 7350525
  25. Gouy M Gautier C. 1982 Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 10: 7055– 7064. 6760125 PMC326988
  26. Guindon S Gascuel O. 2003 A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 52: 696– 704. 14530136
  27. Haas J Park E-C Seed B. 1996 Codon usage limitation in the expression of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Curr Biol. 6: 315– 324. 8805248
  28. Higgs PG Ran W. 2008 Coevolution of codon usage and tRNA genes leads to alternative stable states of biased codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 25: 2279– 2291. 18687657
  29. Ikemura T. 1981 Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E coli translational system. J Mol Biol. 151: 389– 409. 6175758
  30. Ikemura T. 1992 Correlation between codon usage and tRNA content in microorganisms In: Hatfield DL Lee BJ Pirtle RM, editors. Transfer RNA in protein synthesis. Boca Raton: CRC Press p. 87– 111.
  31. Ito K Uno M Nakamura Y. 2000 A tripeptide ‘anticodon’ deciphers stop codons in messenger RNA. Nature 403: 680– 684. 10688208
  32. Jia W Higgs PG. 2008 Codon usage in mitochondrial genomes: distinguishing context-dependent mutation from translational selection. Mol Biol Evol. 25: 339– 351. 18048402
  33. Jin H Bjornsson A Isaksson LA. 2002 Cis control of gene expression in E.coli by ribosome queuing at an inefficient translational stop signal. EMBO J. 21: 4357– 4367. 12169638 PMC126163
  34. Jorgensen F Adamski FM Tate WP Kurland CG. 1993 Release factor-dependent false stops are infrequent in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 230: 41– 50. 8450549
  35. Katoh K Asimenos G Toh H. 2009 Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods Mol Biol. 537: 39– 64. 19378139
  36. Korkmaz G Holm M Wiens T Sanyal S. 2014 Comprehensive analysis of stop codon usage in bacteria and its correlation with release factor abundance. J Biol Chem. 289: 30334– 30342. 25217634 PMC4215218
  37. Marin A Xia X. 2008 GC skew in protein-coding genes between the leading and lagging strands in bacterial genomes: new substitution models incorporating strand bias. J Theor Biol. 253: 508– 513. 18486155
  38. McPherson DT. 1988 Codon preference reflects mistranslational constraints: a proposal. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 4111– 4120. 3131744 PMC336578
  39. Meng SY Hui JO Haniu M Tsai LB. 1995 Analysis of translational termination of recombinant human methionyl-neurotrophin 3 in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 211: 40– 48. 7779107
  40. Miller JH Albertini AM. 1983 Effects of surrounding sequence on the suppression of nonsense codons. J Mol Biol. 164: 59– 71. 6188840
  41. Milman G Goldstein J Scolnick E Caskey T. 1969 Peptide chain termination. 3. Stimulation of in vitro termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 63: 183– 190. 4897024 PMC534020
  42. Mora L Heurgue-Hamard V de Zamaroczy M Kervestin S Buckingham RH. 2007 Methylation of bacterial release factors RF1 and RF2 is required for normal translation termination in vivo. J Biol Chem. 282: 35638– 35645. 17932046
  43. Moriyama EN Hartl DL. 1993 Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics 134: 847– 858. 8349115 PMC1205521
  44. Moriyama EN Powell JR 1997 Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 45: 514– 523. 9342399
  45. Ngumbela KC Ryan KP Sivamurthy R Brockman MA Gandhi RT Bhardwaj N Kavanagh DG. 2008 Quantitative effect of suboptimal codon usage on translational efficiency of mRNA encoding HIV-1 gag in intact T cells. PLoS One 3: e2356. 18523584 PMC2387063
  46. Nikbakht H Xia X Hickey DA. 2014 The evolution of genomic GC content undergoes a rapid reversal within the genus Plasmodium. Genome 57: 507– 511. 25633864
  47. Osawa S Jukes T. 1989 Codon reassignment (codon capture) in evolution. J Mol Evol. 28: 271– 278. 2499683
  48. Osawa S Jukes TH. 1995 On codon reassignment. J Mol Evol. 41: 247– 249. 7666454
  49. Palidwor GA Perkins TJ Xia X. 2010 A general model of codon bias due to GC mutational bias. PLoS One 5: e13431. 21048949 PMC2965080
  50. Parker J. 1989 Errors and alternatives in reading the universal genetic code. Microbiol Rev. 53: 273– 298. 2677635 PMC372737
  51. Povolotskaya IS Kondrashov FA Ledda A Vlasov PK. 2012 Stop codons in bacteria are not selectively equivalent. Biol Direct. 7: 30. 22974057 PMC3549826
  52. Prabhakaran R Chithambaram S Xia X. 2014 Aeromonas phages encode tRNAs for their overused codons. Int J Comput Biol Drug Des. 7: 168– 182. 24878728
  53. Prabhakaran R Chithambaram S Xia X 2015 E. coli and Staphylococcus phages: effect of translation initiation efficiency on differential codon adaptation mediated by virulent and temperate lifestyles. J Gen Virol. 96: 1169– 1179. 25614589 PMC4631060
  54. Ran W Higgs PG. 2012 Contributions of speed and accuracy to translational selection in bacteria. PLoS One 7: e51652. 23272132 PMC3522724
  55. Robinson M Lilley R Little S Emtage JS Yarranton G Stephens P Millican A Eaton M Humphreys G. 1984 Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 6663– 6671. 6091031 PMC320107
  56. Roth JR. 1970 UGA nonsense mutations in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 102: 467– 475. 4315894 PMC247572
  57. Ryden SM Isaksson LA. 1984 A temperature-sensitive mutant of Escherichia coli that shows enhanced misreading of UAG/A and increased efficiency for some tRNA nonsense suppressors. Mol Gen Genet. 193: 38– 45. 6419024
  58. Sambrook JF Fan DP Brenner S. 1967 A strong suppressor specific for UGA. Nature 214: 452– 453. 5340340
  59. Scolnick E Tompkins R Caskey T Nirenberg M. 1968 Release factors differing in specificity for terminator codons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 61: 768– 774. 4879404 PMC225226
  60. Scolnick EM Caskey CT. 1969 Peptide chain termination. V. The role of release factors in mRNA terminator codon recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 64: 1235– 1241. 4916922 PMC223274
  61. Sharp PM Bulmer M. 1988 Selective differences among translation termination codons. Gene 63: 141– 145. 3133285
  62. Sharp PM Li WH. 1986 An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol. 24: 28– 38. 3104616
  63. Sharp PM Rogers MS McConnell DJ. 1984 Selection pressures on codon usage in the complete genome of bacteriophage T7. J Mol Evol. 21: 150– 160. 6100189
  64. Sharp PM Tuohy TM Mosurski KR. 1986 Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 5125– 5143. 3526280 PMC311530
  65. Sorensen MA Kurland CG Pedersen S. 1989 Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 207: 365– 377. 2474074
  66. Stoletzki N Eyre-Walker A. 2007 Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol Biol Evol. 24: 374– 381. 17101719
  67. Strigini P Brickman E. 1973 Analysis of specific misreading in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 75: 659– 672. 4581523
  68. Tamura K Nei M Kumar S. 2004 Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101: 11030– 11035. 15258291 PMC491989
  69. Tate WP Mansell JB Mannering SA Irvine JH Major LL DN W. 1999 UGA: a dual signal for ‘top’ and for recoding in protein synthesis. Biochemistry (Moscow) 64: 1342– 1353. 10648957
  70. van Weringh A Ragonnet-Cronin M Pranckeviciene E Pavon-Eternod M Kleiman L Xia X. 2011 HIV-1 modulates the tRNA pool to improve translation efficiency. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 1827– 1834. 21216840 PMC3098512
  71. Xia X. 1998 How optimized is the translational machinery in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics 149: 37– 44. 9584084 PMC1460137
  72. Xia X. 2005 Mutation and selection on the anticodon of tRNA genes in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes. Gene 345: 13– 20. 15716092
  73. Xia X. 2008 The cost of wobble translation in fungal mitochondrial genomes: integration of two traditional hypotheses. BMC Evol Biol. 8: 211. 18638409 PMC2488353
  74. Xia X. 2009 Information-theoretic indices and an approximate significance test for testing the molecular clock hypothesis with genetic distances. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 52: 665– 676. 19416757
  75. Xia X. 2013 DAMBE5: a comprehensive software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 1720– 1728. 23564938 PMC3684854
  76. Xia X. 2015 A major controversy in codon-anticodon adaptation resolved by a new codon usage index. Genetics 199: 573– 579. 25480780 PMC4317663
  77. Xia X Huang H Carullo M Betran E Moriyama EN. 2007 Conflict between translation initiation and elongation in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes. PLoS One 2: e227. 17311091 PMC1794132

Cited by

Authors
Wei, Y., Wang, J., & Xia, X.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Xia, Xuhua
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2016-06-13
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
2357-2367
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2429224016
Cited by
46
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
release factors, RF1, RF2, unnatural amino acids, UAG, UGA, coevolution, translation termination, highly expressed genes, lowly expressed genes, codon usage bias, A+T content, codon reassignment
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Escherichia coli, Biological Evolution, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Peptide Chain Termination, Translational, Peptide Termination Factors, Ribosomes, Protein Biosynthesis, Codon, Terminator, Evolution, Molecular, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review