Cited by 122RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtist diversity and phylogeny

The mechanisms of codon reassignments in mitochondrial genetic codes

Open access
Sengupta, Supratim, Yang, Xiaoguang, Higgs, Paul G.·2007·Journal of Molecular Evolution

Abstract

Many cases of nonstandard genetic codes are known in mitochondrial genomes. We carry out analysis of phylogeny and codon usage of organisms for which the complete mitochondrial genome is available, and we determine the most likely mechanism for codon reassignment in each case. Reassignment events can be classified according to the gain-loss framework. The "gain" represents the appearance of a new tRNA for the reassigned codon or the change of an existing tRNA such that it gains the ability to pair with the codon. The "loss" represents the deletion of a tRNA or the change in a tRNA so that it no longer translates the codon. One possible mechanism is codon disappearance (CD), where the codon disappears from the genome prior to the gain and loss events. In the alternative mechanisms the codon does not disappear. In the unassigned codon mechanism, the loss occurs first, whereas in the ambiguous intermediate mechanism, the gain occurs first. Codon usage analysis gives clear evidence of cases where the codon disappeared at the point of the reassignment and also cases where it did not disappear. CD is the probable explanation for stop to sense reassignments and a small number of reassignments of sense codons. However, the majority of sense-to-sense reassignments cannot be explained by CD. In the latter cases, by analysis of the presence or absence of tRNAs in the genome and of the changes in tRNA sequences, it is sometimes possible to distinguish between the unassigned codon and the ambiguous intermediate mechanisms. We emphasize that not all reassignments follow the same scenario and that it is necessary to consider the details of each case carefully.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00239-006-0284-7

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no evidence that any modern code modifications are adaptive; most likely they evolved neutrally through genetic drift and mutational pressure driving small genomes toward high AT-content.

    “There is no evidence that any modern code modifications are adaptive. Most likely, these change evolved neutrally, through genetic drift and mutational pressure that drives small genomes toward high AT-content.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sengupta, S., Yang, X., & Higgs, P. G.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Higgs, Paul G.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Published
2007-05-29
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
662-688
ISSN
  • 0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1432
OpenAlex
W2171069213
Cited by
121
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
codon reassignment, mitochondrial genetic code, codon usage, tRNA, stop codon reassignment, mitochondrial genome, phylogeny
MeSH terms
Animals, Codon, Cytoplasm, DNA, Mitochondrial, Fungi, Genetic Code, Introns, Phylogeny, Plants, RNA, Transfer, Ile, Open Reading Frames, Codon, Terminator, Mitochondrial Proteins, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review