Cited by 13Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical Package for Growth Rates Made Easy

Open access
Mira, Portia, Barlow, Miriam, Meza, Juan C, Hall, Barry G·2017·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Growth rates are an important tool in microbiology because they provide high throughput fitness measurements. The release of GrowthRates, a program that uses the output of plate reader files to automatically calculate growth rates, has facilitated experimental procedures in many areas. However, many sources of variation within replicate growth rate data exist and can decrease data reliability. We have developed a new statistical package, CompareGrowthRates (CGR), to enhance the program GrowthRates and accurately measure variation in growth rate data sets. We define a metric, Variability-score (V-score), that can help determine if variation within a data set might result in false interpretations. CGR also uses the bootstrap method to determine the fraction of bootstrap replicates in which a strain will grow the fastest. We illustrate the usage of CGR with growth rate data sets similar to those in Mira, Meza, et al. (Adaptive landscapes of resistance genes change as antibiotic concentrations change. Mol Biol Evol. 32(10): 2707-2715). These statistical methods are compatible with the analytic methods described in Growth Rates Made Easy and can be used with any set of growth rate output from GrowthRates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msx255

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Mira, P., Barlow, M., Meza, J. C., & Hall, B. G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Merced (US)
  • Bellingham Research Institute, Portland, OR
Corresponding author
Mira, Portia
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2017-09-26
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
3303-3309
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2760415306
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (01-R41-AI122740_01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
bacterial growth rate, fitness measurement, statistical software, bootstrapping, growth rate variation, antibiotic resistance, fitness landscape
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Biometry, Software, Colony Count, Microbial, Reproducibility of Results, Microbial Viability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review