Cited by 606Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa

Aitken, R.J., De Iuliis, G.N.·2010·Molecular Human Reproduction

Abstract

DNA damage in the male germ line has been linked with a variety of adverse clinical outcomes including impaired fertility, an increased incidence of miscarriage and an enhanced risk of disease in the offspring. The origins of this DNA damage could, in principle, involve: (i) abortive apoptosis initiated post meiotically when the ability to drive this process to completion is in decline (ii) unresolved strand breaks created during spermiogenesis to relieve the torsional stresses associated with chromatin remodelling and (iii) oxidative stress. In this article, we present a two-step hypothesis for the origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa that highlights the significance of oxidative stress acting on vulnerable, poorly protaminated cells generated as a result of defective spermiogenesis. We further propose that these defective cells are characterized by several hallmarks of 'dysmaturity' including the retention of excess residual cytoplasm, persistent nuclear histones, poor zona binding and disrupted chaperone content. The oxidative stress experienced by these cells may originate from infiltrating leukocytes or, possibly, the entry of spermatozoa into an apoptosis-like cascade characterized by the mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species. This oxidative stress may be exacerbated by a decline in local antioxidant protection, particularly during epididymal maturation. Finally, if oxidative stress is a major cause of sperm DNA damage then antioxidants should have a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molehr/gap059

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OS negatively affects all sperm functions, including sperm DNA integrity, and thereby the fertilization process and reproductive outcomes.

    “Consequently, OS negatively affects all sperm functions, including sperm DNA integrity [47,48], and thereby the fertilization process and reproductive outcomes [49,50,51,52,53,54,55].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aitken, R. J., & De Iuliis, G. N.
Affiliations
Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Aitken, R.J.
Venue
Molecular Human Reproduction
Published
2009-07-31
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
3-13
ISSN
  • 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2407
OpenAlex
W2070097578
Cited by
606
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 37
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
sperm DNA damage, male germline, spermiogenesis, oxidative stress, protamine deficiency, epididymal maturation, reactive oxygen species, male infertility, antioxidants, leukocyte infiltration, nuclear histones, spermatozoa
MeSH terms
Chromatin, DNA Damage, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Spermatozoa, Reactive Oxygen Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review