The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The ability of the Comet assay to discriminate between genotoxins and cytotoxins
Abstract
The Comet assay has been used widely in genetic toxicology, radiation biology and medical and environmental research. This assay detects single-strand breaks and alkali-labile sites in DNA and DNA degradation due to necrosis or apoptosis. It may also be modified to detect DNA cross-linking. Although a considerable number of chemicals have been tested in the assay there are many aspects of validation to be considered before the method could be considered to provide definitive evidence of genotoxic potential. For example, very few non-genotoxins have been tested to assess specificity of the Comet assay and there has been only one reported study which investigated whether the in vitro Comet assay is prone to false positive responses due to cytotoxicity. We have investigated the response of the alkaline Comet assay in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells to cytotoxic damage and genotoxic damage. Several compounds which are toxic by different mechanisms were tested in the assay. Cycloheximide and trypsin gave a negative comet response at a highest dose of 5 mg/ml and no toxicity was observed. Sodium lauryl sulphate and potassium cyanide produced a significant increase in DNA migration at cell survival levels of < or = 75%. The distribution of damaged cells indicated that cells at various stages of necrotic cell death were present. Hydrogen peroxide, 4-nitroquinoline oxide, 9-aminoacridine, ethyl methanesulphonate, N-nitroso-N-ethylurea and glyoxal gave a positive comet response. Mitomycin C was negative at survival levels of approximately 70%. These results indicate that the maximum concentration of test substance tested should produce viabilities > 75% in order to avoid false positive responses due to cytotoxicity. The assay was able to detect DNA damage induced by an alkylating agent, an intercalating agent and oxidative damage. The cross-linking agent mitomycin C was not detected if a cut-off point of 75% viability is used as the criterion of a positive response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing
Tice, R. R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E., Ryu, J.-C., & Sasaki, Y. F. (2000) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::aid-em8>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 4,860
Plewa, M. J., Wagner, E. D., Richardson, S. D., Thruston, A. D., Woo, Y.-T., & McKague, A. B. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es049971v · Cited by 517
Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay
Jha, A. N. (2008) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gen014 · Cited by 477
The comet assay: A sensitive method for detecting DNA damage in individual cells
Liao, W., McNutt, M. A., & Zhu, W.-G. (2009) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.02.016 · Cited by 339
Comet assay in genetic ecotoxicology: A review
Cotelle, S., & F�rard, J. F. (1999) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1999)34:4<246::aid-em4>3.0.co;2-v · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, L., Wolfreys, A., Fedyk, J., Bourner, C., & Windebank, S.
- Venue
- Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-94
- ISSN
- 0267-8357 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3804
- OpenAlex
- W2171879046
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ability of the Comet assay to discriminate between genotoxins and cytotoxins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mutage/13.1.89
- The paper
- Henderson, L., Wolfreys, A., Fedyk, J., Bourner, C., & Windebank, S. (1998). The ability of the Comet assay to discriminate between genotoxins and cytotoxins. Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/13.1.89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.