The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay
Abstract
Application of the single-cell gel electrophoresis or comet assay has revolutionized the field of genetic ecotoxicology or eco-genotoxicology. It is a rapid, sensitive and relatively inexpensive method providing the opportunity to study DNA damage (including oxidative damage), repair and cell death (apoptosis) in different cell types without prior knowledge of karyotype and cell turnover rate. The assay has, however, often attracted criticism for its lack of ecotoxicological relevance. In addition, in contrast to genetic toxicology where rapid technical progress has been made to improve cell- and tissue-specific adoption of the assay, only limited advancement has been made to transfer the methodologies to ecotoxicological studies. While reviewing the recent information available in the literature and underscoring the importance of induced genetic damage in natural species, the aims of this article are to (i) highlight and judiciously analyse the ecotoxicological relevance of the assay; (ii) attempt to correlate the comet response with other relevant biological responses or biomarkers; (iii) identify the technical challenges and various factors affecting its application in order to make it reliable, reproducible and robust; (iv) critically compare the technical developments in genetic toxicology and genetic ecotoxicology and (v) evaluate the future developments with respect to applications of the assay. It is suggested that while complementing other ecotoxicological parameters and further improving the methodologies, the comet assay will continue to play an important role in genetic ecotoxicology to determine induced genetic damage, which has significant consequences for short- and long-term survival of the natural or wild species. Information obtained through integrated studies using simultaneous applications of multiple biomarkers on different wild organisms could also provide an holistic dimension of toxicological impact of environmental contaminants for the protection of human health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells
Singh, N. P., McCoy, M. T., Tice, R. R., & Schneider, E. L. (1988) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0 · Cited by 10,828
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
(1961) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.37.425.168-b · Cited by 5,862
Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing
Tice, R. R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E., Ryu, J.-C., & Sasaki, Y. F. (2000) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::aid-em8>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 4,860
Wendelaar Bonga, S. E. (1997) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1997.77.3.591 · Cited by 4,188
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
(1980) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90077-9 · Cited by 2,243
Dobzhansky, T. (1955) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1955.tb01521.x · Cited by 1,686
Oxidative DNA damage and disease: induction, repair and significance
Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Cooke, M. S. (2004) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.11.001 · Cited by 1,372
Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them
Spielman, D., Brook, B. W., & Frankham, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403809101 · Cited by 1,251
Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay
Hartmann, A. (2003) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/18.1.45 · Cited by 1,063
Cited by
Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals
Lushchak, V. I. (2011) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.10.006 · Cited by 2,729
Wang, Q., Chen, X., Jha, A. N., & Rogers, H. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.065 · Cited by 785
Self-citationMechanisms of genotoxicity. A review of in vitro and in vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles
Magdolenova, Z., Collins, A., Kumar, A., Dhawan, A., Stone, V., & Dusinska, M. (2014) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.773464 · Cited by 616
Microplastics effects in Scrobicularia plana
Ribeiro, F., Garcia, A. R., Pereira, B. P., Fonseca, M., Mestre, N. C., Fonseca, T. G., Ilharco, L. M., & Bebianno, M. J. (2017) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.078 · Cited by 492
Lavorgna, M., Russo, C., D'Abrosca, B., Parrella, A., & Isidori, M. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.11.042 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Jha, A. N.
- Venue
- Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-02-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-221
- ISSN
- 0267-8357 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3804
- OpenAlex
- W2107685897
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 97
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mutage/gen014
- The paper
- Jha, A. N. (2008). Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay. Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gen014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.