The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical issues in the use of the comet assay
Open accessAbstract
The comet or single-cell gel electrophoresis assay is now widely used in regulatory, mechanistic and biomonitoring studies using a range of in vitro and in vivo systems. Each of these has issues associated with the experimental design which determine to a large extent the statistical analyses than can be used. A key concept is that the experimental unit is the smallest 'amount' of experimental material that can be randomly assigned to a treatment: the animal for in vivo studies and the culture for in vitro studies. Biomonitoring studies, being observational rather than experimental, are vulnerable to confounding and biases. Critical factors in any statistical analysis include the identification of suitable end points, the choice of measure to represent the distribution of the comet end point in a sample of cells, estimates of variability between experimental units and the identification of the size of effects that could be considered biologically important. Power and sample size calculations can be used in conjunction with this information to identify optimum experimental sizes and provide help in combining the results of statistical analyses with other information to aid interpretation. Interpretation based upon the size of effects and their confidence intervals is preferred to that based solely upon statistical significance tests. Statistical issues associated with the design and subsequent analyses of current validation studies for the comet assay include the identification of acceptable levels of intra- and inter-laboratory repeatability and reproducibility and criteria for dichotomizing results into positive or negative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The characteristics of the data, such as the experimental unit, the data type, and the (assumed) distribution, will guide various experimental features, including different levels of replication, number of test concentrations, and experimental repetitions (Lovell and Omori, 2008).”
From Toward good in vitro reporting standards (2019) · cites this paper as Lovell and Omori, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,356
A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells
Singh, N. P., McCoy, M. T., Tice, R. R., & Schneider, E. L. (1988) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0 · Cited by 10,828
Nelder, J. A., & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344614 · Cited by 7,703
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
Dunnett, C. W. (1955) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294 · Cited by 6,097
American society for testing and materials
Mather, B., & Etris, S. F. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-30720-6_5 · Cited by 5,561
Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing
Tice, R. R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D. C., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E., Ryu, J., & Sasaki, Y. F. (2000) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3 · Cited by 4,885
Statistics for experimenters. An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978) · Cited by 4,021
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Montgomery, D. C. (1997) Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair
Azqueta, A., & Collins, A. R. (2013) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1070-0 · Cited by 500
Möller, P., Azqueta, A., Boutet-Robinet, E. A., Koppen, G., Bonassi, S., Milić, M., Gajski, G., Costa, S., Teixeira, J. P., Pereira, C. C., et al. (2020) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0398-1 · Cited by 398
Plewa, M. J., Simmons, J. E., Richardson, S. D., & Wagner, E. D. (2010) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.20585 · Cited by 349
The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions
Dušinská, M., & Collins, A. R. (2008) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gen007 · Cited by 324
The comet assay in nanotoxicology research
Karlsson, H. L. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3977-0 · Cited by 236
The Comet Assay: A Sensitive Genotoxicity Test for the Detection of DNA Damage and Repair
Speit, G., & Rothfuß, A. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_6 · Cited by 229
The comet assay as a tool for human biomonitoring studies: The ComNet Project
Collins, A. R., Koppen, G., Valdiglesias, V., Dušinská, M., Kruszewski, M. K., Möller, P., Rojas, E., Dhawan, A., Benzie, I. F. F., Coşkun, E., et al. (2013) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.10.001 · Cited by 227
Occurrence and Comparative Toxicity of Haloacetaldehyde Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water
Jeong, C. H., Postigo, C., Richardson, S. D., Simmons, J. E., Kimura, S. Y., Mariñas, B. J., Barceló, ., Liang, P., Wagner, E. D., & Plewa, M. J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es506358x · Cited by 225
DNA oxidation: Investigating its key role in environmental mutagenesis with the comet assay
Azqueta, A., Shaposhnikov, S. A., & Collins, A. R. (2008) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.10.013 · Cited by 196
Jeong, C. H., Wagner, E. D., Siebert, V., Anduri, S., Richardson, S. D., Daiber, E. J., McKague, A. B., Kogevinas, M., Villanueva, C. M., Goslan, E. H., et al. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3024226 · Cited by 190
The comet assay: past, present, and future
Langie, S. A. S., Azqueta, A., & Collins, A. R. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00266 · Cited by 170
Application of the comet assay in human biomonitoring: An hCOMET perspective
Azqueta, A., Ladeira, C., Giovannelli, L., Boutet-Robinet, E. A., Bonassi, S., Neri, M., Gajski, G., Duthie, S. J., Bo’, C. D., Riso, P., et al. (2019) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.108288 · Cited by 165
Comet assay: an essential tool in toxicological research
Glei, M., Schneider, T. L., & Schlörmann, W. (2016) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1767-y · Cited by 153
Balasubramanyam, A., Sailaja, N., Mahboob, M., Rahman, M. F., Hussain, S. M., & Grover, P. (2009) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gep003 · Cited by 145
The comet assay: ready for 30 more years
Möller, P. (2017) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gex046 · Cited by 140
Wei, X., Yang, M., Zhu, Q., Wagner, E. D., & Plewa, M. J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02035 · Cited by 131
Rothfuß, A., O'Donovan, M. R., Boeck, M. D., Brault, D., Czich, A., Custer, L. L., Hamada, S., Plappert‐Helbig, U., Hayashi, M., Howe, J., et al. (2010) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.07.006 · Cited by 111
Singh, S. P., Rahman, M. F., Murty, U. S. N., Mahboob, M., & Grover, P. (2012) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2012.10.016 · Cited by 110
Moller, P., Moller, L., Godschalk, R., & Jones, G. D. D. (2010) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gep067 · Cited by 107
Milić, M., Ceppi, M., Bruzzone, M., Azqueta, A., Brunborg, G., Godschalk, R., Koppen, G., Langie, S. A. S., Möller, P., Teixeira, J. P., et al. (2021) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108371 · Cited by 106
Chloramination of wastewater effluent: Toxicity and formation of disinfection byproducts
Roux, J. L., Plewa, M. J., Wagner, E. D., Nihemaiti, M., Dad, A., & Croué, J. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2017.04.022 · Cited by 97
In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity investigations of differently sized amorphous SiO2 nanomaterials
Maser, E., Schulz, M., Sauer, U. G., Wiemann, M., Ma‐Hock, L., Wohlleben, W., Hartwig, A., & Landsiedel, R. (2015) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.10.005 · Cited by 89
Schulz, M., Ma‐Hock, L., Brill, S., Strauss, V., Treumann, S., Gröters, S., van Ravenzwaay, B., & Landsiedel, R. (2011) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.11.016 · Cited by 86
The Comet assay in insects—Status, prospects and benefits for science
Augustyniak, M., Gladysz, M., & Dziewięcka, M. (2015) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.09.001 · Cited by 86
Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cellulose nanofibers
de Lima, R., Mattoso, L. H. C., Feitosa, MARUYAMA, M., Barga, Yamawaki, Vieira, Teixeira, & Fraceto, L. F. (2012) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s30596 · Cited by 81
Genotoxic and inflammatory effects of nanofibrillated cellulose in murine lungs
Catalán, J., Rydman, E., Aimonen, K., Hannukainen, K., Suhonen, S., Vanhala, E., Moreno, C., Meyer, V., Perez, D. D. S., Sneck, A., et al. (2016) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gew035 · Cited by 81
Wang, L., Niu, M., Zheng, C., Zhao, H., Niu, X., Li, L., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, J., & Zhang, Z. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201800819 · Cited by 79
Wagner, E. D., Hsu, K.-M., Lagunas, A. M., Mitch, W. A., & Plewa, M. J. (2011) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.11.006 · Cited by 78
Plewa, M. J., Wagner, E. D., Metz, D. H., Kashinkunti, R. D., Jamriska, K. J., & Meyer, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es300859t · Cited by 76
Villarini, M., Dominici, L., Piccinini, R., Fatigoni, C., Ambrogi, M., Curti, G. L., Morucci, P., Muzi, G., Monarca, S., & Moretti, M. (2010) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/geq102 · Cited by 74
Waterworth, W. M., Kozák, J., Provost, C. M., Bray, C. M., Angelis, K. J., & West, C. E. (2009) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-9-79 · Cited by 73
Measurement of oxidative damage to DNA in nanomaterial exposed cells and animals
Möller, P., Jensen, D. M., Christophersen, D. V., Kermanizadeh, A., Jacobsen, N. R., Hemmingsen, J. G., Danielsen, P. H., Karottki, D. G., Roursgaard, M., Cao, Y., et al. (2014) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.21899 · Cited by 72
In vitroandin vivogenotoxic effects of straight versus tangled multi-walled carbon nanotubes
Catalán, J., Siivola, K., Nymark, P. E. H., Lindberg, H., Suhonen, S., Järventaus, H., Koivisto, A. J., Moreno, C., Vanhala, E., Wolff, H. J., et al. (2015) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2015.1132345 · Cited by 72
Galdiero, E., Siciliano, A., Maselli, V., Gesuele, R., Guida, M., Fulgione, D., Galdiero, S., Lombardi, L., & Falanga, A. (2016) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s107752 · Cited by 68
Hoelzl, C., Knasmüller, S., Mišík, M., Collins, A. R., Dušinská, M., & Nersesyan, A. K. (2008) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.07.004 · Cited by 68
Toxicological Comparison of Water, Wastewaters, and Processed Wastewaters
Dong, S., Page, M. A., Massalha, N., Hur, A. Y., Hur, K., Bokenkamp, K., Wagner, E. D., & Plewa, M. J. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00827 · Cited by 65
Reisinger, K., Blatz, V., Brinkmann, J., Downs, T. R., Fischer, A., Henkler, F., Hoffmann, S., Krul, C., Liebsch, M., Luch, A., et al. (2018) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.01.003 · Cited by 64
Jeong, C. H., Machek, E. J., Shakeri, M., Duirk, S. E., Ternes, T. A., Richardson, S. D., Wagner, E. D., & Plewa, M. J. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.032 · Cited by 66
Toward good in vitro reporting standards
Hartung, T. (2019) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1812191 · Cited by 65
“The characteristics of the data, such as the experimental unit, the data type, and the (assumed) distribution, will guide various experimental features, including different levels of replication, number of test concentrations, and experimental repetitions (Lovell and Omori, 2008).”
BackgroundRecommendations on the statistical analysis of the Comet assay
Bright, J. D., Aylott, M. C., Bate, S. T., Geys, H., Jarvis, P., Saul, J., & Vonk, R. (2011) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.530 · Cited by 62
Moller, P., Hemmingsen, J. G., Jensen, D. M., Danielsen, P. H., Karottki, D. G., Jantzen, K., Roursgaard, M., Cao, Y., Kermanizadeh, A., Klingberg, H., et al. (2014) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/geu035 · Cited by 62
Oxidative DNA damage in chronic renal failure patients
Stoyanova, E., Sandoval, S. B., Zúñiga-Venegas, L. A., Yamani, N. E., Coll, E., Pastor, S., Reyes, J., Andrés, E., Ballarín, J., Xamena, N., et al. (2009) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp575 · Cited by 60
Proposal of an in vivo comet assay using haemocytes of Drosophila melanogaster
Carmona, E. R., Guecheva, T. N., Creus, A., & Marcos, R. (2010) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.20604 · Cited by 59
The Comet Assay: Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo DNA Damage
Bajpayee, M., Kumar, A., & Dhawan, A. (2013) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-529-3_17 · Cited by 58
Dallas, L. J., Bean, T. P., Turner, A., Lyons, B. P., & Jha, A. N. (2013) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.03.009 · Cited by 56
Nunes, R. D. S., Kahl, V. F. S., Sarmento, M. D. S., Richter, M. F., Costa-Lotufo, L. V., Rodrigues, F. A. R., Abin‐Carriquiry, J. A., Martinez, M. M., Ferronatto, S., Ferraz, A. D. B. F., et al. (2011) · Plant Foods for Human Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s11130-011-0223-7 · Cited by 55
Statistical evaluation of toxicological bioassays – a review
Hothorn, L. A. (2014) · Toxicology Research · doi:10.1039/c4tx00047a · Cited by 54
Physical principles and new applications of comet assay
Afanasieva, K. S., & Sivolob, A. (2018) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2018.04.003 · Cited by 54
The comet assay in higher terrestrial plant model: Review and evolutionary trends
Lanier, C., Manier, N., Cuny, D., & Deram, A. (2015) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.020 · Cited by 52
Martins, C., Doran, C., Laires, A., Rueff, J., & Rodrigues, A. S. (2010) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2010.11.013 · Cited by 52
Statistical analysis of comet assay results
Møller, P., & Loft, S. H. (2014) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00292 · Cited by 52
Pfuhler, S., Pirow, R., Downs, T. R., Haase, A., Hewitt, N. J., Luch, A., Merkel, M., Petrick, C., Said, A., Schäfer‐Korting, M., et al. (2020) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/geaa009 · Cited by 52
Frogs, sentinels of DNA damage induced by pollution in Naples and the neighbouring Provinces
Maselli, V., Polese, G., Rippa, D., Ligrone, R., Rastogi, R. K., & Fulgione, D. (2010) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.05.011 · Cited by 51
In Vitro Approaches for Assessing the Genotoxicity of Nanomaterials
Dušinská, M., Mariussen, E., Rundén‐Pran, E., Hudecova, A. M., Elje, E., Kažimı́rová, A., Yamani, N. E., Dommershausen, N., Tharmann, J., Fieblinger, D., et al. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8916-4_6 · Cited by 51
Galdiero, E., Falanga, A., Siciliano, A., Maselli, V., Guida, M., Carotenuto, R., Tussellino, M., Lombardi, L., Benvenuto, G., & Galdiero, S. (2017) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s127226 · Cited by 50
Préaubert, L., Tassistro, V., Auffan, M., Sari-Minodier, I., Rose, J., Courbière, B., & Perrin, J. (2018) · Toxicology in Vitro · doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2018.03.013 · Cited by 47
DNA damage induced by hydroquinone can be prevented by fungal detoxification
Pereira, P., Enguita, F. J., Ferreira, J. A., & Leitão, A. L. (2014) · Toxicology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.10.024 · Cited by 46
Toxicity of food colours and additives: A review
Olusegun, E. T., & Olajire, A. A. (2015) · African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.5897/ajpp2015.4385 · Cited by 46
Seasonal variations as predictive factors of the comet assay parameters: a retrospective study
Gerić, M., Gajski, G., Oreščanin, V., & Garaj‐Vrhovac, V. (2017) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gex023 · Cited by 46
Assessment of genotoxic effects of lead in occupationally exposed workers
Chinde, S., Kumari, M., Devi, K. R., Murty, U. S., Rahman, M. F., Kumari, S. I., Mahboob, M., & Grover, P. (2014) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3128-9 · Cited by 44
Platel, A., Privat, K., Talahari, S., Delobel, A., Dourdin, G., Gateau, E., Simar, S., Saleh, Y., Sotty, J., Anthérieu, S., et al. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134666 · Cited by 44
Genotoxic potential of dental bulk-fill resin composites
Tauböck, T. T., Marović, D., Želježić, D., Steingruber, A. D., Attin, T., & Tarle, Z. (2017) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.011 · Cited by 43
Di, Y., Aminot, Y., Schroeder, D. C., Readman, J. W., & Jha, A. N. (2016) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gew049 · Cited by 42
Kumar, M., Shyama, S. K., Sonaye, B. S., Naik, U. R., Kadam, S. B., Bipin, P. D., D’Costa, A., & Chaubey, R. C. (2014) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.02.007 · Cited by 41
Nucleotide excision repair activity on DNA damage induced by photoactivated methylene blue
Berra, C. M., de Oliveira, C. S., Garcia, C. C. M., Rocha, C. R. R., Lerner, L. K., Lima, L. C. D. A., Baptista, M. D. S., & Menck, C. F. M. (2013) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.03.026 · Cited by 40
Cammerer, Z., Bhalli, J. A., Cao, X., Coffing, S. L., Dickinson, D. A., Dobo, K. L., Dobrovolsky, V. N., Engel, M. E., Fiedler, R. D., Gunther, W. C., et al. (2011) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.20686 · Cited by 40
Begum, N., Prasad, N. R., Kanimozhi, G., & Hasan, A. Q. (2012) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.04.001 · Cited by 40
Toxicogenetic monitoring in urban cities exposed to different airborne contaminants
Pereira, T. D. S., Beltrami, L. S., Rocha, J. A. V., Broto, F. P., Comellas, L. R., Salvadori, D. M. F., & Vargas, V. M. F. (2013) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.12.029 · Cited by 39
Ceccarini, M. R., Vannini, S., Cataldi, S., Moretti, M., Villarini, M., Fioretti, B., Albi, E., Beccari, T., & Codini, M. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/7529521 · Cited by 38
Mladinić, M., Želježić, D., Shaposhnikov, S. A., & Collins, A. R. (2012) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.001 · Cited by 38
Genotoxicity testing of two lead-compounds in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster
Carmona, E. R., Creus, A., & Marcos, R. (2011) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.05.008 · Cited by 37
Gajski, G., Gerić, M., Semren, T. Ž., Lovaković, B. T., Oreščanin, V., & Pizent, A. (2019) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.11.010 · Cited by 37
Estragole: A weak direct-acting food-borne genotoxin and potential carcinogen
Martins, C., Cação, R., Cole, K. J., Phillips, D. H., Laires, A., Rueff, J., & Rodrigues, A. S. (2012) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.04.009 · Cited by 38
Genotoxic effects of two nickel-compounds in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster
Carmona, E. R., Creus, A., & Marcos, R. (2010) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.10.008 · Cited by 36
Frenzilli, G., Ryskalin, L., Ferrucci, M., Cantafora, E., Chelazzi, S., Giorgi, F. S., Lenzi, P., Scarcelli, V., Frati, A., Biagioni, F., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2017.00049 · Cited by 36
Dallas, L. J., Bean, T. P., Turner, A., Lyons, B. P., & Jha, A. N. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Radioactivity · doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.034 · Cited by 35
Extent of Received Antenatal Care Components in Ethiopia: A Community-Based Panel Study
Shiferaw, K., Mengistie, B., Gobena, T., Dheresa, M., & Seme, A. (2021) · International Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s327750 · Cited by 34
Genotoxicity in two bivalve species from a coastal lagoon in the south of Portugal
Almeida, C., Pereira, C. G., Gomes, T., Cardoso, C., Bebianno, M. J., & Cravo, A. (2013) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.04.008 · Cited by 34
McArt, D. G., McKerr, G., Howard, C. V., Saetzler, K., & Wasson, G. R. (2009) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0370914 · Cited by 33
Dallas, L. J., & Jha, A. N. (2015) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.03.014 · Cited by 31
Platel, A., Dusautoir, R., Kervoaze, G., Dourdin, G., Gateau, E., Talahari, S., Huot, L., Simar, S., Ollivier, A., Laine, W., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127246 · Cited by 32
The Comet Assay: Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo DNA Damage
Bajpayee, M., Kumar, A., & Dhawan, A. (2019) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9646-9_12 · Cited by 30
Zeni, O., Sannino, A., Sarti, M., Romeo, S., Massa, R., & Scarfı̀, M. R. (2012) · Bioelectromagnetics · doi:10.1002/bem.21712 · Cited by 30
Zeller, A., & Pfuhler, S. (2013) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/get053 · Cited by 30
Aberrantly Expressed Timeless Regulates Cell Proliferation and Cisplatin Efficacy in Cervical Cancer
Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., Zou, X., Kuai, L., Wang, L., Wang, J., Shen, F., Hu, J., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., et al. (2019) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2019.080 · Cited by 28
Lombardi, G., Vannini, S., Blasi, F., Marcotullio, M. C., Dominici, L., Villarini, M., Cossignani, L., & Moretti, M. (2015) · Natural Product Communications · doi:10.1177/1934578x1501000823 · Cited by 28
The miniaturized enzyme-modified comet assay for genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials
Yamani, N. E., Rundén‐Pran, E., Collins, A. R., Longhin, E., Elje, E., Hoet, P., Vrček, I. V., Doak, S. H., Fessard, V., & Dušinská, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2022.986318 · Cited by 28
DNA integrity of human leukocytes after magnetic resonance imaging
Szerencsi, Á., Kubinyi, G., Váliczkó, É., Juhász, P., Rudas, G., Mester, Á. R., Jánossy, G., Bakos, J., & Thuróczy, G. (2013) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.3109/09553002.2013.804962 · Cited by 27
Romeo, S., Sannino, A., Scarfı̀, M. R., Massa, R., d’Angelo, R., & Zeni, O. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19398 · Cited by 27
de Mendonça, E. D., da Silva, J., dos Santos, M. S., Carvalho, P., Papke, D. K. M., Ortmann, C. F., Picada, J. N., Reginatto, F. H., & Ferraz, A. D. B. F. (2016) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2016.07.046 · Cited by 27
Zulhussnain, M., Zahoor, M. K., Rizvi, H., Zahoor, M. A., Rasul, A., Ahmad, A., Majeed, H. N., Rasul, A., Ranian, K., & Jabeen, F. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63815-w · Cited by 27
Jakopović, B., Oršolić, N., & Pavelić, S. K. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25215005 · Cited by 27
Safrole-2′,3′-oxide induces cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in HepG2 cells and in mice
Chiang, S., Lee, P.-Y., Lai, M., Shen, L., Chung, W., Huang, H., Wu, K., & Wu, H.-C. (2011) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.09.014 · Cited by 27
Galdiero, E., Maselli, V., Falanga, A., Gesuele, R., Galdiero, S., Fulgione, D., & Guida, M. (2015) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.03.046 · Cited by 26
Genomic damage as a biomarker of chronic kidney disease status
Corredor, Z., Stoyanova, E., Rodríguez‐Ribera, L., Coll, E., Silva, I., Díaz, J. M., Ballarín, J., Marcos, R., & Pastor, S. (2014) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.21911 · Cited by 26
Menezes, A. P. S., da Silva, J., Roloff, J., Reyes, J. M., Debastiani, R., Dias, J. F., Rohr, P., & Ferraz, A. D. B. F. (2013) · Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00244-013-9918-0 · Cited by 26
Hertel‐Aas, T., Oughton, D. H., Jaworska, A., & Brunborg, G. (2011) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/ger048 · Cited by 26
Bivehed, E., Gustafsson, A., Berglund, A., & Hellman, B. E. (2019) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-019-00328-6 · Cited by 26
Martinović, R., Kolarević, S., Kračun‐Kolarević, M., Kostić, J., Marković, S., Gačić, Z. M., Kljajić, Z., & Vuković‐Gačić, B. (2015) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.05.001 · Cited by 26
Effects of cold atmospheric plasma on mucosal tissue culture
Welz, C., Becker, S., Li, Y., Shimizu, T., Jeon, J., Schwenk‐Zieger, S., Thomas, H. M., Isbary, G., Morfill, G. E., Harréus, U., et al. (2012) · Journal of Physics D Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/46/4/045401 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovell, D. P., & Omori, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Lovell, D. P.
- ORCID
- Omori, T.
- Venue
- Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-02-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-182
- ISSN
- 0267-8357 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3804
- OpenAlex
- W2142519394
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Mutagenesis (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Keywords
- comet assay, statistical design, biomonitoring, confounding and bias, sample size and power, effect size, confidence intervals, assay validation, repeatability and reproducibility, experimental units, mutagenicity testing
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, DNA Damage, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Comet Assay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review