The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vitro genotoxicity testing of four reference metal nanomaterials, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, cerium oxide and silver: towards reliable hazard assessment
Open accessAbstract
There is serious concern about the potential harmful effects of certain nanomaterials (NMs), on account of their ability to penetrate cell membranes and the increased reactivity that results from their increased surface area compared with bulk chemicals. To assess the safety of NMs, reliable tests are needed. We have investigated the possible genotoxicity of four representative NMs, derived from titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, cerium oxide and silver, in two human cell lines, A549 alveolar epithelial cells and lymphoblastoid TK6 cells. A high-throughput version of the comet assay was used to measure DNA strand beaks (SBs) as well as oxidised purines (converted to breaks with the enzyme formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase). In parallel, cytotoxicity was measured with the alamarBlue® assay, and the ability of NM-treated cells to survive was assessed by their colony-forming efficiency. TiO2 and CeO2 NMs were only slightly cytotoxic by the alamarBlue® test, and had no long-term effect on colony-forming efficiency. However, both induced DNA damage at non-cytotoxic concentrations; the damage decreased from 3 to 24-h exposure, except in the case of CeO2-treated A549 cells. ZnO and Ag NMs affected cell survival, and induced high levels of DNA damage at cytotoxic concentrations. At lower concentrations, there was significant damage, which tended to persist over 24 h. The implication is that all four reference metal NMs tested—whether cytotoxic or not—are genotoxic. A full assessment of NM toxicity should include tests on different cell types, different times of incubation and a wide range of (especially non-cytotoxic) concentrations; a test for cell viability should be performed in parallel. Inclusion of Fpg in the comet assay allows detection of indirect genotoxic effects via oxidative stress.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is further supported by in vitro testing of CeO2 NM-212 revealing genotoxic effects at non-cytotoxic levels in different cell lines [51].”
From Effects from a 90-day inhalation toxicity study with cerium oxide and barium sulfate nanoparticles in rats (2017) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Ekkapongpisit, 2012, Biocompatibility, endocytosis, and intracellular trafficking of mesoporous silica and polystyrene nanoparticles in ovarian cancer cells: effects of size and surface charge groups, Int. J. Nanomed, 7, 4147
- 10.1002/smll.200901158 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12989-014-0065-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/mutage/geu077 · DOI
- Manke, 2013, Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity, Biomed. Res. Int, 2013, 942916, 10.1155/2013/942916 · DOI
- 10.1093/toxsci/kfj197 · DOI
- De Stefano, 2012, Nanomaterials toxicity and cell death modalities, J. Drug Deliv, 2012, 167896, 10.1155/2012/167896 · DOI
- Cowie, 2015, Suitability of human and mammalian cells of different origin for the assessment of genotoxicity of metal and polymeric engineered nanoparticles, Nanotoxicology, 9, 57, 10.3109/17435390.2014.940407 · DOI
- Dusinska, 2015, Towards an alternative testing strategy for nanomaterials used in nanomedicine: lessons from NanoTEST, Nanotoxicology, 9, 118, 10.3109/17435390.2014.991431 · DOI
- Collins A. R. Annangi B. Rubio L. . (2016) High throughput toxicity screening and intracellular detection of nanomaterials. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.
- 10.3109/17435390.2013.816797 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12989-015-0100-x · DOI
- Ponti, 2010, Colony Forming Efficiency and microscopy analysis of multi-wall carbon nanotubes cell interaction, Toxicol. Lett, 197, 29, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.04.018 · DOI
- 10.1039/c0nr00618a · DOI
- Dusinska, 2009, Testing strategies for the safety of nanoparticles used in medical applications, Nanomedicine (Lond), 4, 605, 10.2217/nnm.09.47 · DOI
- Catalán J. Suhonen S. Huk A. and Dusinska M . (2014) Analysis of nanoparticle-induced DNA damage by the comet assay. Genotoxicity DNA Repair, 241–268. · DOI
- 10.3109/17435390.2013.829590 · DOI
- Sasaki K. Huk A. Yamani N. E. Tanaka N. and Dusinska M . (2014) Bhas 42 Cell Transformation Assay for Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens. In Sierra M. L. and Gaivão I . (eds.), Genotoxicity and DNA Repair: A Practical Approach. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 343–362. · DOI
- Demir, 2015, Genotoxic and cell-transforming effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Environ. Res, 136, 300, 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.032 · DOI
- 10.3109/17435390.2011.629747 · DOI
- Sekar, 2014, DNA damage and repair following In vitro exposure to two different forms of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on trout erythrocyte, Environ. Toxicol, 29, 117, 10.1002/tox.20778 · DOI
- Ursini, 2014, Differences in cytotoxic, genotoxic, and inflammatory response of bronchial and alveolar human lung epithelial cells to pristine and COOH-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Biomed. Res. Int, 2014, 359506, 10.1155/2014/359506 · DOI
- 10.1002/jat.3038 · DOI
- Cavallo, 2015, Investigation on cobalt-oxide nanoparticles cyto-genotoxicity and inflammatory response in two types of respiratory cells, J. Appl. Toxicol, 35, 1102, 10.1002/jat.3133 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schwotzer, D., Ernst, H., Schaudien, D., Kock, H., Pohlmann, G., Dasenbrock, C., & Creutzenberg, O. (2017) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-017-0204-6 · Cited by 94
“CeO2 NM-212 revealing genotoxic effects at non-cytotoxic levels in different cell lines [51].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- El Yamani, N., Collins, A. R., Rundén-Pran, E., Fjellsbø, L. M., Shaposhnikov, S., Zielonddiny, S., & Dusinska, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- NILU (NO)
- Comet Biotech (Norway) (NO)
- Venue
- Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-126
- ISSN
- 0267-8357 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3804
- OpenAlex
- W2552483231
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Mutagenesis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
- Keywords
- metal nanomaterials, genotoxicity, in vitro genotoxicity testing, titanium dioxide nanoparticles, zinc oxide nanoparticles, cerium oxide nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, DNA strand breaks, formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase, cytotoxicity, plating efficiency, oxidative stress, A549 cells, TK6 cells, hazard assessment
- MeSH terms
- Cell Line, Cell Survival, DNA, DNA Damage, Humans, Oxidative Stress, Comet Assay, Escherichia coli Proteins, DNA-Formamidopyrimidine Glycosylase, Metal Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro genotoxicity testing of four reference metal nanomaterials, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, cerium oxide and silver: towards reliable hazard assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mutage/gew060
- The paper
- El Yamani, N., Collins, A. R., Rundén-Pran, E., Fjellsbø, L. M., Shaposhnikov, S., Zielonddiny, S., & Dusinska, M. (2017). In vitro genotoxicity testing of four reference metal nanomaterials, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, cerium oxide and silver: towards reliable hazard assessment. Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gew060